Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2020; 52(04): 267-273
DOI: 10.1055/a-1241-9930
Fallbericht

Therapie einer Distalbisslage mit mandibulärer Schwenkung – ein Fallbericht

Therapy of Distal Occlusion with Mandibular Deviation – A Case Report
Katrin Kley
1   Klinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universität Freiburg
,
Britta A. Jung
1   Klinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universität Freiburg
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Artikel beschreibt die Therapie eines jugendlichen Patienten mit einer skelettalen Klasse II und mandibulärer Schwenkung mittels funktionskieferorthopädischer Geräte (herausnehmbar und festsitzende Klasse-II-Mechanik).

Abstract

This article describes the therapy of an adolescent patient with a skeletal class II and mandibular deviation using functional orthodontic appliances (removable and fixed).

Schlüsselwörter

Klasse II - Herbstscharnier - mandibuläre Schwenkung

Key Words

Class II malocclusion - Herbst Appliance - mandibular deviation


Publication History

Article published online:
02 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ingervall B. Prevalence of dental and occlusal anomalies in Swedish conscripts. Acta Odontol Scand 1974; 32: 83-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bažant V, Miksa J. Die Häufigkeit der Okklusionsanomalien in sagittaler Richtung in der Klassifikation nach Angle bei Erwachsenen. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1960; 21: 328-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lippold C, van den Bos L, Hohoff A. et al. Interdisciplinary study of orthopedic and orthodontic findings in pre-school infants. J Orofac Orthop 2003; 64: 330-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brunelle JA, Bhat M, Lipton JA. Prevalence and distribution of selected occlusal characteristics in the US population, 1988–1991. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 706-713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vyslozil O, Jonke E. Kieferorthopädisch-antropometrische Vergleichsuntersuchung an 100 Jahre alten menschlichen Schädeln und österreichischen Bundesheersoldaten. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1994; 26: 409-436
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tschill P, Bacon W, Sonko A. Malocclusion in the deciduous dentition of Caucasian children. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 361-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kloeppel J. Untersuchung über einige Entstehungsursachen des Distalbisses. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1961; 22: 388-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Grabowski R, Kundt G, Stahl F. Interrelation between occlusal findings and orofacial myofunctional status in primary and mixed dentition: Part III: Interrelation between malocclusions and orofacial dysfunctions. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68: 462-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Harris EF, Johnson MG. Heritability of craniometric and occlusal variables: a longitudinal sib analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 258-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Zebrick B, Teeramongkolgul T, Nicot R. et al. ACTN3 R577X genotypes associate with Class II and deepbite malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146: 603-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Koretsi V, Zymperdikas VF, Papageorgiou SN. et al. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37: 418-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zymperdikas VF, Koretsi V, Papageorgiou SN. et al. Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38: 113-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kinzinger G, Czapka K, Ludwig B. et al. Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle Class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: fMA vs. Herbst appliance–a retrospective cephalometric study. J Orofac Orthop 2011; 72: 301-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bock NC, Ruf S. Class II division 2 treatment- does skeletal maturiy influence successand stability?. J Orofac Orthop 2013; 74: 187-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sander FG. Indikation für die Anwendung der Vorschubdoppelplatte. Prakt Kieferorthop 1988; 2: 209-222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sander FG, Wichelhaus A. Skelettale und dentale Veränderungen bei der Anwendug der Vorschubdoppelplatte. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1995; 56: 127-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pancherz H, Salé H, Bjerklin K. Signs and symptoms of TMJ disorders in adults after adolescscent Herbts therapy: a 6-year and 32-year radiograpfic and clinical follow-up study. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 735-742
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Salé H, Bryndahl F, Isberg A. Temporomandibular koints in asymptomatic and symptomatic nonpatient volunteers: a prospective 15-year folluw-up clinical and MR imaging study. Radiology 2013; 267: 183-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pancherz H, Ruf S. The Herbst appliance: research-based clinical management. London: Quintessence Publishing; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 239-246
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wichelhaus A, Eichenberg T, Günter A. Kieferorthopädie Therapie Band I. 2. unveränderte Auflage. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Bock NC, Reiser B, Ruf S. Class II subdivision treatment with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 327-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pancherz H. Herbst-Behandlung der unilateralen Klasse-II-Dysgnathie. Kieferorthopädie 2016; 30: 235-242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pancherz H. „Headgear-Effekt” der Herbst-Apparatur. Kieferorthopädie 2020; 34: 153-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar