Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2021; 53(02): 149-158
DOI: 10.1055/a-1183-4338
Originalarbeit

Langzeitevaluation nach autologer Fetttransplantation zur Brustvergrößerung

Long-term evaluation after autologous fat transplantation for breast augmentation
Charlotte Sophie Ueberreiter
1   Park-Klinik Birkenwerder Plastic Surgery
,
Klaus Ueberreiter
1   Park-Klinik Birkenwerder Plastic Surgery
,
Chris Mohrmann
2   Klinikum Oldenburg AöR Anästhesiologie/Intensiv-/Notfallmedizin/Schmerztherapie
,
Juliane Herm
3   Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin Center for Stroke Research Berlin
,
Christian Herold
4   DIAKO Bremen, Chirurgische Klinik, Sektion Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie
› Author Affiliations

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Die Transplantation autologen Fettgewebes ist eine vermehrt angewandte, jedoch nicht standardisierte Prozedur in der plastischen und rekonstruktiven Chirurgie. Bisher gab es lediglich Untersuchungen zu kurzfristigen Ergebnissen über den Volumenerhalt nach einer Fettgewebstransplantation. In dieser Arbeit werden die Ergebnisse einer Langzeitstudie über Fettgewebstransplantationen zur Brustvergrößerung vorgestellt.

Patienten/Material und Methoden Bei 14 Patientinnen wurde präoperativ sowie 5–9 Jahre (Median 6 Jahre) nach der Transplantation autologen Fettgewebes in die Brust nach dem BEAULI-Protokoll ein MRT angefertigt. Die Volumendifferenz wurde mit der Software OsiriX miteinander verglichen. Da zusätzlich die Auswirkung von Gewichtsschwankungen ermittelt werden sollten, wurden die Patientinnen in zwei Gruppen eingeteilt. In Gruppe 1 wurden Patientinnen mit einer Gewichtszunahme von < 1 kg/m2, in Gruppe 2 Patientinnen mit einer Gewichtszunahme von > 1 kg/m2 eingeschlossen. Die mediane BMI-Zunahme lag bei 1,6 kg/m2 (Minimal 0 – maximal 3,9). Eine der Patientinnen hatte nach vorübergehender Gewichtszunahme während der Transplantationen wieder ihr Ausgangsgewicht erreicht.

Ergebnisse Die Patientinnen erhielten je nach gewünschtem Endergebnis zwischen einem und 4 Eingriffe, in welchen ein mittleres Volumen von 176 ml Fettgewebe pro Brust pro Eingriff transplantiert wurde. In der ersten Gruppe konnte ein medianer Volumenerhalt des transplantierten Fettgewebes von 74 % (IQA 58 % – 92 %) errechnet werden. In der zweiten Gruppe wurde sogar eine Volumenzunahme von im Median 135 % (IQA 105 % – 318 %) beobachtet.

Schlussfolgerung In der vorliegenden Studie zeigen sich stabile Langzeitergebnisse bei der Einheilungsrate vom transplantierten Fettgewebe. Es konnte eine signifikante Korrelation zwischen Gewichtszunahme und Volumenerhalt des transplantierten Gewebes gezeigt werden. Damit ist auch die teilweise überproportional hohe Volumenzunahme bei einigen Patientinnen zu erklären. Die Transplantation autologen Fettgewebes ergibt die Möglichkeit einer sicheren und effizienten Methode zur Brustvergrößerung. Für eine genauere Aussage sind jedoch weiterführende Studien mit größeren Fallzahlen notwendig.

Abstract

Background The transplantation of autologous fat is an increasingly common but not standardized procedure in aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. Until now only studies about the short-term results after transplantation with autologous fat have been published. In this publication we present our results of a long-term study after fat transplantation.

Patients/Material and Methods 14 patients underwent an MRI investigation which was done before and 5–9 years (mean 6 years) years after aesthetic breast lipofilling according to BEAULI-protocol. The difference in volume was calculated with the open source software OsiriX. Two groups were analyzed separately to calculate the influence of body weight changes in final volume gain. In the first group patients with a stable BMI (increase of less than 1 kg/m2) were included. The second group includes patients with a BMI gain exceeding more than 1 kg/m2. The mean increase in BMI was 1,6 kg/m2 (minimum 0 – maximum 3,9). None of the patients lost weight.

Results Depending on the desired amount of breast augmentation the patients underwent between one to four operations. An average of 176 ml fat was transplanted per breast and surgery. In the first group a mean volume survival of 74 % (IQR 58 % – 92 %) was observed. In the second group an increase of 135 % (IQR 105 % – 318 %) of the volume of transplanted fat was observed. After an intermediate weight loss one of the patients regained her initial weight.

Conclusion In this study the transplantation of autologous fat renders good long-term results. There is a significant correlation between change of weight and fat transplant volume survival over the years. This also explains the very high increase in breast volume in some patients. Autologous fat transplantation seems to be a safe and efficient method for breast augmentation. For further statements studies with larger number of cases are necessary.



Publication History

Received: 12 May 2019

Accepted: 06 May 2020

Article published online:
10 August 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Khouri RK, Khouri RK. Current Clinical Applications of Fat Grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140: 466e-486e
  • 2 Fabiocchi L, Semprini G, Cattin F. et al. ‚Reverse expansion‘: A new technique of breast reconstruction with autologous tissue. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2017; 70: 1537-1542
  • 3 Simonacci F, Bertozzi N, Grieco MP. et al. Procedure, applications, and outcomes of autologous fat grafting. Ann Med Surg 2017; 20: 49-60
  • 4 Tuncel U, Kurt A, Gumus M. et al. Preliminary results with non-centrifuged autologous fat graft and percutaneous aponeurotomy for treating Dupuytren’s disease. Hand Surg Rehabil 2017; 36: 350-354
  • 5 Prantl L, Rennekampff HO, Giunta RE. et al. Aktuelle Erkenntnisse zur Eigenfett Transplantation anhand der neuen Leitlinie „Autologe Fetttransplantation“. Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plast Chir 2016; 48: 330-336
  • 6 Griffin MF, Almadori A, Butler PE. Use of Lipotransfer in Scleroderma. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37: S33-S37
  • 7 Spiekman M, van Dongen JA, Willemsen JC. et al. The power of fat and its adipose-derived stromal cells: emerging concepts for fibrotic scar treatment. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2017; 11: 3220-3235
  • 8 Stasch T, Hoehne J, Huynh T. et al. Débridement and Autologous Lipotransfer for Chronic Ulceration of the Diabetic Foot and Lower Limb Improves Wound Healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136: 1357-1366
  • 9 Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G. et al. Fat Injection to the Breast: Technique, Results, and Indications Based on 880 Procedures Over 10 Years. Aesthetic Surg J 2009; 29: 360-376
  • 10 Münch DP. Breast augmentation with autologous fat – experience of 96 procedures with the BEAULI-technique. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2013; 45: 80-92
  • 11 Bertolini F, Petit J-Y, Kolonin MG. Stem cells from adipose tissue and breast cancer: hype, risks and hope. Br J Cancer 2015; 112: 419-423
  • 12 Simorre M, Chaput B, Voglimacci Stephanopoli M. et al. Lipofilling in breast reconstruction: is there any population with higher risk of local recurrence? Literature systematic review. Gynecol Obs Fertil 2015; 43: 309-318
  • 13 Petit JY, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N. et al. Safety of Lipofilling in Patients with Breast Cancer. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42: 339-344
  • 14 Kronowitz SJ, Mandujano CC, Liu J. et al. Lipofilling of the Breast Does Not Increase the Risk of Recurrence of Breast Cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 385-393
  • 15 Myckatyn TM, Wagner IJ, Mehrara BJ. et al. Cancer Risk after Fat Transfer: A Multicenter Case-Cohort Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139: 11-18
  • 16 Gale KL, Rakha EA, Ball G. et al. A Case-Controlled Study of the Oncologic Safety of Fat Grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 1263-1275
  • 17 Sorrentino L, Regolo L, Scoccia E. et al. Autologous fat transfer after breast cancer surgery: An exact-matching study on the long-term oncological safety. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45: 1827-1834
  • 18 Weigand A, Tasbihi K, Strissel PL. et al. Development of an Innovative Cell Isolation Method for the Investigation of Breast Cancer Pathogenesis and Angiogenesis for Experimental In Vitro And In Vivo Assays. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2017; 49: 111-122
  • 19 Coleman SR. Structural fat grafts: the ideal filler?. Clin Plast Surg 2001; 28: 111-119
  • 20 Bellini E, Grieco MP, Raposio E. The science behind autologous fat grafting. Ann Med Surg 2017; 24: 65-73
  • 21 Sinna R, Delay E, Garson S. et al. Breast fat grafting (lipomodelling) after extended latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction: A preliminary report of 200 consecutive cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2010; 63: 1769-1777
  • 22 Spear SL, Pittman T. A prospective study on lipoaugmentation of the breast. Aesthetic Surg J 2014; 34: 400-408
  • 23 Khouri R, Del Vecchio D. Breast Reconstruction and Augmentation Using Pre-Expansion and Autologous Fat Transplantation. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36: 269-280
  • 24 Nishimura T, Hashimoto H, Nakanishi I. et al. Microvascular Angiogenesis and Apoptosis in the Survival of Free Fat Grafts. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 1333-1338
  • 25 Ueberreiter K, Von Finckenstein JG, Cromme F. et al. BEAULI – Eine neue Methode zur einfachen und zuverlässigen Fettzell-Transplantation. Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plast Chir 2010; 42: 379-385
  • 26 Herold C, Ueberreiter K, Cromme F. et al. The use of mamma MRI volumetry to evaluate the rate of fat survival after autologous lipotransfer. MRT-Volumetrie der Mamma zur Kontrolle der Fettresorptionsrate nach autologem Lipotransfer 2010; 42: 129-134
  • 27 Peltoniemi HH, Salmi A, Miettinen S. et al. Stem cell enrichment does not warrant a higher graft survival in lipofilling of the breast: A prospective comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1494-1503
  • 28 Peltoniemi HH, Salmi A, Saariniemi K. et al. Enrichment with Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Does Not Enhance Water-Jet Fat Graft Survival in the Breast – A Prospective Comparative Study. Surg Sci 2016; 07: 485-495
  • 29 Mohrmann C, Herold C, Pflaum M. et al. Viability and Particle Size of Fat Grafts Obtained with WAL and PAL Techniques. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2015; 47: 246-252
  • 30 Stutman RL, Codner M, Mahoney A. et al. Comparison of Breast Augmentation Incisions and Common Complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36: 1096-1104
  • 31 Spear SL, Murphy DK. Allergan Silicone Breast Implant U. S. Core Clinical Study Group. Natrelle Round Silicone Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 1354-1361
  • 32 Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K. Capsular Contracture after Breast Augmentation: An Update for Clinical Practice. Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42: 532
  • 33 Khouri RK, Khouri RK, Rigotti G. et al. Aesthetic Applications of Brava-Assisted Megavolume Fat Grafting to the Breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 796-807
  • 34 Schautz B, Later W, Heller M. et al. Associations between breast adipose tissue, body fat distribution and cardiometabolic risk in women: cross-sectional data and weight-loss intervention. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011; 65: 784-790
  • 35 Hussain Z, Roberts N, Whitehouse GH. et al. Estimation of breast volume and its variation during the menstrual cycle using MRI and stereology. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 236-245
  • 36 Herold C, Ueberreiter K, Cromme F. et al. Is there a need for intrapectoral injection in autologous fat transplantation to the breast? – An MRI volumetric study. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2011; 43: 119-124
  • 37 Yin S, Luan J, Fu S. et al. Does Water-Jet Force Make a Difference in Fat Grafting? In Vitro and In Vivo Evidence of Improved Lipoaspirate Viability and Fat Graft Survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 127-138
  • 38 Meyer J, Salamon A, Herzmann N. et al. Isolation and Differentiation Potential of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Adipose Tissue Harvested by Water Jet-Assisted Liposuction. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35: 1030-1039
  • 39 Mashiko T, Yoshimura K. How Does Fat Survive and Remodel After Grafting?. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42: 181-190
  • 40 Peltoniemi HH, Salmi A, Miettinen S. et al. Stem cell enrichment does not warrant a higher graft survival in lipofilling of the breast: A prospective comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1494-1503
  • 41 Yoshimura K, Sato K, Aoi N. et al. Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer for Cosmetic Breast Augmentation: Supportive Use of Adipose-Derived Stem/Stromal Cells. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32: 48-55
  • 42 Laloze J, Varin A, Gilhodes J. et al. Cell-assisted lipotransfer: Friend or foe in fat grafting? Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2018; 12: e1237-e1250
  • 43 Cucchiani R, Corrales L. The Effects of Fat Harvesting and Preparation, Air Exposure, Obesity, and Stem Cell Enrichment on Adipocyte Viability Prior to Graft Transplantation. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36: 1164-1173
  • 44 Keck M, Zeyda M, Gollinger K. et al. Local Anesthetics Have a Major Impact on Viability of Preadipocytes and Their Differentiation into Adipocytes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 1500-1505
  • 45 Fiaschetti V, Pistolese CA, Fornari M. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation after breast autologous fat grafting combined with platelet-rich plasma. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 498-509
  • 46 Herold C, Ueberreiter K, Busche MN. et al. Autolog us fat transplantation: Volumetric tools for estimation of volume survival. a systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37: 380-387
  • 47 Glovinski PV, Herly M, Müller FC. et al. Avoiding a Systematic Error in Assessing Fat Graft Survival in the Breast with Repeated Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg – Glob Open 2016; 4: e1023