Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective analysis of 110 cases

Abstract

Background Data on the reliability of the Ki-67 index and grading calculations from endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are controversial. We aimed to assess the accuracy of these data compared with histology.

Methods Cytological analysis from EUS-FNA in patients with suspected PanNETs (n = 110) were compared with resection samples at a single institution. A minimum of 2000 cells were considered to be adequate for grading. Correlation and agreement between cytology and histology in grading and Ki-67 values, respectively, were investigated. Secondary outcomes included the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA.

Results EUS-FNA samples were adequate for PanNET diagnosis and PanNET grading in 98/110 (89.1 %) and 77/110 (70.0 %) patients, respectively; thus, 77 samples were adequate for comparing cytology vs. histology. There were 67 (62.0 %), 40 (36.4 %), and 1 (0.9 %) patients with a final diagnosis of G1, G2, and G3 tumors, respectively. EUS-FNA grading was concordant with surgical pathology in 81.8 % of patients; under- and overgrading occurred in 15.6 % and 2.6 %, respectively. The overall level of agreement for grading was moderate (Cohen’s κ = 0.59, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.34 – 0.78). Spearman’s rho for Ki-67 in tumors ≤ 20 mm and > 20 mm was strong and moderate, respectively (rho = 0.68, 95 %CI 0.47 – 0.83; rho = 0.59, 95 %CI 0.35 – 0.75). The Bland – Altman plot showed that the Ki-67 values were comparable and reproducible between the two measurements.

Conclusions Although they were not available for a significant number of patients, grading and Ki-67 values from cytology correlated with histology moderately to strongly.

Publication History

Received: 12 October 2019

Accepted: 29 April 2020

Article published online:
04 June 2020

• References

• 1 Halfdanarson TR, Rabe KG, Rubin J. et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1727-1733
• 2 Scarpa A, Chang DK, Nones K. et al. Whole-genome landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Nature 2017; 543: 65-71
• 3 Klöppel G, Adsay NV, Couvelard A. et al. Tumours of the pancreas. Neuroendocrine neoplasms. In: WHO classification of tumours. Digestive system tumours. 5th. edn International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019: 343-372
• 4 Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G. et al. ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103: 153-171
• 5 Partelli S, Cirocchi R, Crippa S. et al. Systematic review of active surveillance versus surgical management of asymptomatic small non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Br J Surg 2017; 104: 34-41
• 6 Hasegawa T, Yamao K, Hijioka S. et al. Evaluation of Ki-67 index in EUS-FNA specimens for the assessment of malignancy risk in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 32-38
• 7 Li J, Lin JP, Shi LH. et al. How reliable is the Ki-67 cytological index in grading pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors? A meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2016; 17: 95-103
• 8 Weynand B, Borbath I, Bernard V. et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour grading on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: high reproducibility and inter-observer agreement of the Ki-67 labelling index. Cytopathology 2014; 25: 389-395
• 9 Li H, Li W, Zhou QY. et al. Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e0207
• 10 Weiss VL, Kiernan C, Wright J. et al. Fine-needle aspiration-based grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms using Ki-67: is accurate WHO grading possible on cytologic material?. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2018; 7: 154-159
• 11 Leeds JS, Nayar MK, Bekkali NLH. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy is superior to fine-needle aspiration in assessing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E1281-E1287
• 12 Liszka Ł. Tissue heterogeneity contributes to suboptimal precision of WHO 2010 scoring criteria for Ki67 labeling index in a subset of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. Pol J Pathol 2017; 67: 318-331
• 13 Cheng B, Zhang Y, Chen Q. et al. Analysis of fine-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of pancreatic and abdominal masses: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1314-1321
• 14 van Riet PA, Larghi A, Attili F. et al. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 329-339
• 15 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M. et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1453-1457
• 16 Boutsen L, Jouret-Mourin A, Borbath I. et al. Accuracy of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour grading by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: analysis of a large cohort and perspectives for improvement. Neuroendocrinology 2018; 106: 158-166
• 17 Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P. et al. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline – March 2017. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 989-1006
• 18 Nakai Y, Isayama H, Chang KJ. et al. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59: 1578-1585
• 19 Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh J. et al. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 445-450
• 20 Ieni A, Todaro P, Crino SF. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in pancreaticobiliary carcinomas: diagnostic efficacy of cell-block immunocytochemistry. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2015; 14: 305-312
• 21 Landoni L, Marchegiani G, Pollini T. et al. The evolution of surgical strategies for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NENs): time-trend and outcome analysis from 587 consecutive resections at a high-volume institution. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 725-732
• 22 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
• 23 Hooper K, Mukhtar F, Li S. et al. Diagnostic error assessment and associated harm of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. Cancer Cytopathol 2013; 121: 653-660
• 24 Larghi A, Capurso G, Carnuccio A. et al. Ki-67 grading of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on histologic samples obtained by EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 570-577
• 25 Manta R, Nardi E, Pagano N. et al. Pre-operative diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography in a large series. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2016; 25: 317-321
• 26 Diaz Del Arco C, Esteban Lopez-Jamar JM, Ortega Medina L. et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: correlation between Ki-67 index in cytological samples and clinical behavior. Diagn Cytopathol 2017; 45: 29-35
• 27 Cui Y, Khanna LG, Saqi A. et al. The role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided Ki67 in the management of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Endosc 2020; 53: 213-220
• 28 Baruah A, Adsay V, Pant M. et al. Mo1329 diagnostic yield and predictors of adequate cytology sampling for ki67 on endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: AB448
• 29 Farrell JM, Pang JC, Kim GE. et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: accurate grading with Ki-67 index on fine-needle aspiration specimens using the WHO 2010/ENETS criteria. Cancer Cytopathol 2014; 122: 770-778
• 30 Di Leo M, Poliani L, Rahal D. et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the role of endoscopic ultrasound biopsy in diagnosis and grading based on the WHO 2017 Classification. Dig Dis 2019; 37: 325-333
• 31 Hijioka S, Hara K, Mizuno N. et al. Diagnostic performance and factors influencing the accuracy of EUS-FNA of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. J Gastroenterol 2016; 51: 923-930
• 32 Unno J, Kanno A, Masamune A. et al. The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 1367-1374
• 33 Fujimori N, Osoegawa T, Lee L. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol 2016; 51: 245-252