physioscience 2020; 16(01): 39-41
DOI: 10.1055/a-1086-7418
gelesen und kommentiert
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die akuten Effekte von Gelenkmanipulationstechniken auf Marker der Aktivität des autonomen Nervensystems: Eine Literaturübersicht und Metaanalyse von randomisierten Sham-kontrollierten Studien

The Acute Effects of Joint Manipulative Techniques on Markers of Autonomic Nervous System Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Sham-controlled Trials
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 March 2020 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Joint manipulative techniques (JMT) sind Behandlungstechniken, die bei muskuloskelettalen Schmerzen von vielen verschiedenen Therapeutengruppen eingesetzt werden [1]. JMT können sowohl an der Wirbelsäule als auch an peripheren Gelenken sowie in unterschiedlichen Intensitäten als Mobilisation oder als „High-velocity-low-amplitude“-Technik (HVLA-Manipulation) angewendet werden. Es werden biomechanische [2] [3] [4] und neurophysiologische Outcomes wie neuromuskuläre Antwort [3], Schmerz [5] sowie die Aktivität des autonomen Nervensystems (ANS) [6] [7] [8] genutzt. JMT scheinen sowohl eine Hypalgesie [5] als auch eine sympathische Erregung [6] [7] zu erzielen.


#
 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Hurwitz EL. Epidemiology: spinal manipulation utilization. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2012; 22 (05) 648-654
  • 2 Branney J, Breen AC. Does inter-vertebral range of motion increase after spinal manipulation? A prospective cohort study. Chiropr Man Therap 2014; 22 (01) 24
  • 3 Nougarou F, Pagé I, Loranger M. et al. Neuromechanical response to spinal manipulation therapy: effects of a constant rate of force application. BMC Complement Altern Med 2016; 16 (01) 161
  • 4 Funabashi M, Nougarou F, Descarreaux M. et al. Does the application site of spinal manipulative therapy alter spinal tissues loading?. Spine J 2018; 18 (06) 1041-1052
  • 5 Millan M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Budgell B. et al. The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on experimentally induced pain: a systematic literature review. Chiropr Man Therap 2012; 20 (01) 26
  • 6 Chu J, Allen DD, Pawlowsky S. et al. Peripheral response to cervical or thoracic spinal manual therapy: an evidence-based review with meta analysis. J Man Manip Ther 2014; 22 (04) 220-229
  • 7 Kingston L, Claydon L, Tumilty S. The effects of spinal mobilizations on the sympathetic nervous system: a systematic review. Man Ther 2014; 19 (04) 281-287
  • 8 Amoroso Borges BL, Bortolazzo GL, Neto HP. Effects of spinal manipulation and myofascial techniques on heart rate variability: a systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2018; 22 (01) 203-208
  • 9 Higgins JPT GSe. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated march 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org (13.12.2019)
  • 10 Figner B, Murphy RO. Using skin conductance in judgment and decision making research. A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: a critical review and user’s guide. New York, NY: Psychology Pr; 2011
  • 11 Laborde S, Mosley E, Thayer JF. Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research – recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis, and data reporting. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 213
  • 12 Zegarra-Parodi R, Park PYS, Heath DM. et al. Assessment of skin blood flow following spinal manual therapy: a systematic review. Man Ther 2015; 20 (02) 228-249
  • 13 Hejjel L, Roth E. What is the adequate sampling interval of the ECG signal for heart rate variability analysis in the time domain?. Physiol Meas 2004; 25 (06) 1405-1411
  • 14 Petersen N, Vicenzino B, Wright A. The effects of a cervical mobilisation technique on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Physiother Theory Pract 1993; 9 (03) 149-156
  • 15 Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright T. Sudomotor changes induced by neural mobilisation techniques in asymptomatic subjects. J Man Manip Ther 1994; 2 (02) 66-74
  • 16 Slater H, Vicenzino B, Wright A. ‘Sympathetic slump’: the effects of a novel manual therapy technique on peripheral sympathetic nervous system function. J Man Manip Ther 1994; 2 (04) 156-162
  • 17 Simon R, Vicenzino B, Wright A. The influence of an anteroposterior accessory glide of the glenohumeral joint on measures of peripheral sympathetic nervous system function in the upper limb. Man Ther 1997; 2 (01) 18-23
  • 18 McGuiness J, Vicenzino B, Wright A. Influence of a cervical mobilization technique on respiratory and cardiovascular function. Man Ther 1997; 2 (04) 216-220
  • 19 Vicenzino B, Cartwright T, Collins D. et al. Cardiovascular and respiratory changes produced by lateral glide mobilization of the cervical spine. Man Ther 1998; 3 (02) 67-71
  • 20 Vicenzino B, Collins D, Benson H. et al. An investigation of the interrelationship between manipulative therapy-induced hypoalgesia and sympathoexcitation. J Manip Physiol Ther 1998; 21 (07) 448-453
  • 21 Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A. Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Man Ther 2001; 6 (02) 72-81
  • 22 Perry J, Green A. An investigation into the effects of a unilaterally applied lumbar mobilisation technique on peripheral sympathetic nervous system activity in the lower limbs. Man Ther 2008; 13 (06) 492-499
  • 23 Jowsey P, Perry J. Sympathetic nervous system effects in the hands following a grade III postero-anterior rotatory mobilisation technique applied to T4: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Man Ther 2010; 15 (03) 248-253
  • 24 La Touche R, París-Alemany A, Mannheimer JS. et al. Does mobilization of the upper cervical spine affect pain sensitivity and autonomic nervous system function in patients with Cervico-craniofacial pain?: a randomized-controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2013; 29 (03) 205-215
  • 25 Yung E, Wong M, Williams H. et al. Blood pressure and heart rate response to posteriorly directed pressure applied to the cervical spine in young, pain-free individuals: a randomized, repeated-measures, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44 (08) 622-626
  • 26 Piekarz V, Perry J. An investigation into the effects of applying a lumbar Maitland mobilisation at different frequencies on sympathetic nervous system activity levels in the lower limb. Man Ther 2016; 23: 83-89
  • 27 Zegarra-Parodi R, Pazdernik VK, Roustit M. et al. Effects of pressure applied during standardized spinal mobilizations on peripheral skin blood flow: a randomised cross-over study. Man Ther 2016; 21: 220-226
  • 28 Yung EY, Oh C, Wong MS. et al. The immediate cardiovascular response to joint mobilization of the neck – a randomized, placebocontrolled trial in pain-free adults. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2017; 28: 71-78
  • 29 Araujo FX, Scholl Schell M, Ferreira GE. et al. Autonomic function and pressure pain threshold following thoracic mobilization in asymptomatic subjects: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2018; 22 (02) 313-320
  • 30 Henderson AT, Fisher JF, Blair J. et al. Effects of rib raising on the autonomic nervous system: a pilot study using noninvasive biomarkers. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2010; 110 (06) 324-330
  • 31 Paungmali A, O'Leary S, Souvlis T. et al. Hypoalgesic and sympathoexcitatory effects of mobilization with movement for lateral epicondylalgia. Phys Ther 2003; 83 (04) 374-383
  • 32 Moulson A, Watson T. A preliminary investigation into the relationship between cervical snags and sympathetic nervous system activity in the upper limbs of an asymptomatic population. Man Ther 2006; 11 (03) 214-224
  • 33 Moutzouri M, Perry J, Billis E. Investigation of the effects of a centrally applied lumbar sustained natural Apophyseal glide mobilization on lower limb sympathetic nervous system activity in asymptomatic subjects. J Manip Physiol Ther 2012; 35 (04) 286-294
  • 34 Tsirakis V, Perry J. The effects of a modified spinal mobilisation with leg movement (SMWLM) technique on sympathetic outflow to the lower limbs. Man The 2015; 20 (01) 103-108
  • 35 Bowler N, Browning P, Lascurain-Aguirrebeña I. The effects of cervical sustained natural apophyseal glides on neck range of movement and sympathetic nervous system activity. Int J Osteopath Med 2017; 25: 15-20
  • 36 Budgell B, Hirano F. Innocuous mechanical stimulation of the neck and alterations in heart-rate variability in healthy young adults. Auton Neurosci 2001; 91 (01) 96-99
  • 37 Budgell B, Polus B. The effects of thoracic manipulation on heart rate variability: a controlled crossover trial. J Manip Physiol Ther 2006; 29 (08) 603-610
  • 38 Roy RA, Boucher JP, Comtois AS. Heart rate variability modulation after manipulation in pain-free patients vs patients in pain. J Manip Physiol Ther 2009; 32 (04) 277-286
  • 39 Sillevis R, Cleland J, Hellman M. et al. Immediate effects of a thoracic spine thrust manipulation on the autonomic nervous system: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther 2010; 18 (04) 181-190
  • 40 Puhl AA, Injeyan HS. Short-term effects of manipulation to the upper thoracic spine of asymptomatic subjects on plasma concentrations of epinephrine and norepinephrine—a randomized and controlled observational study. J Manip Physiol Ther 2012; 35 (03) 209-215
  • 41 Ward J, Coats J, Tyer K. et al. Immediate effects of anterior upper thoracic spine manipulation on cardiovascular response. J Manip Physiol Ther 2013; 36 (02) 101-110
  • 42 Sampath KK, Botnmark E, Mani R. et al. Neuroendocrine response following a thoracic spinal manipulation in healthy men. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47 (09) 617-627