Download PDF
Sprache · Stimme · Gehör 2020; 44(02): 84-89
DOI: 10.1055/a-1043-7766
Schwerpunktthema

Komplexe semantische Verarbeitung bei kognitiven Kommunikationsstörungen

Complex Semantic Processing in Cognitive-Communication Disorders
Anna Rosenkranz‡
1   Universität zu Köln
,
Jana Quinting‡
1   Universität zu Köln
,
Carola de Beer
2   Universität Potsdam
,
Katharina Hogrefe
3   Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
Petra Jaecks
4   Universität Bielefeld
,
Kristina Jonas
1   Universität zu Köln
,
Ilona Rubi-Fessen
1   Universität zu Köln
,
Katja Hußmann
5   Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen resultieren aus einer beeinträchtigten Interaktion kognitiver und sprachlicher Funktionen, die insbesondere soziale Kommunikation, Text- und Diskursverarbeitung betreffen. Zudem zeigen sich Beeinträchtigungen in der komplexeren semantischen Verarbeitung. Ziel des Artikels ist es, die aktuelle Studienlage und Diagnostikverfahren darzustellen und ein ursächliches Bedingungsgefüge zu diskutieren.

Abstract

Cognitive Communication Disorders (CCD) result from impaired interaction between cognitive and language processing and mainly affect social communication as well as text- and discourse processing. Even though CCD are not defined as directly affecting the language system, difficulties in complex semantic processing are frequently observed. Our article aims to present current research evidence as well as diagnostic tools used in CCD. We further discuss mechanisms potentially underlying CCD.

Schlüsselwörter

Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen - komplexe semantische Verarbeitung - Pragmatik - Kognition - Diagnostik

Keywords

Cognitive communication disorders - complex semantic processing - pragmatics - cognition - diagnostic

* geteilte Erstautorschaft




Publication History

Article published online:
28 April 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 MacDonald S. Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: a model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Inj 2017; 31: 1760-1780 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1379613.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 McDonald S, Togher L, Code C. , eds. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Brain, behaviour and cognition. London: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Regenbrecht F, Guthke T. Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen in der Sprachtherapie und der Neuropsychologie. Aphasie Verwandte Gebiete 2017; 1: 16-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Büttner J, Glindemann R. Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen. Band 19. Fortschritte der Neuropsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Hinchliffe FJ, Murdoch BE, Chenery HJ. Towards a conceptualization of language and cognitive impairment in closed-head injury: use of clinical measures. Brain Inj 1998; 12: 109-132 DOI: 10.1080/026990598122746.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Simpson F, Christie J, Mortensen L. et al. Mount Wilga High Level Language Test. Administration & scoring manual plus test form with UK adaptations and large print additions. Unpublished Test; 2006
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Monetta L, Pell MD. Effects of verbal working memory deficits on metaphor comprehension in patients with Parkinsonʼs disease. Brain Lang 2007; 101: 80-89 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.007.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Quinting J, Jonas K, Stenneken P. et al. „Aus dem Rahmen gefallen?“ Metaphern und Idiome zur Identifikation Kognitiver Kommunikationsstörungen. Forschung Sprache 2019; 7: 25-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Belke E, Stielow A. Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2013; 66: 2135-2160 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.775318.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Thiele K, Quinting JM, Stenneken P. New ways to analyze word generation performance in brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of additional performance measures. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2016; 38: 764-781 DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1163327.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Stielow A, Stenneken P. Der Beitrag exekutiver und sprachlicher Teilleistungen in semantischen und formal-lexikalischen Wortflüssigkeitsaufgaben. Sprache Stimme Gehör 2017; 41: 197-203 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-117202.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gauthier S, LeBlanc J, Seresova A. et al. Acute prediction of outcome and cognitive-communication impairments following traumatic brain injury: the influence of age, education and site of lesion. J Commun Disord 2018; 73: 77-90 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.04.003.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Berg E, Björnram C, Hartelius L. et al. High-level language difficulties in Parkinsonʼs disease. Clin Linguist Phonet 2003; 17: 63-80 DOI: 10.1080/0269920021000055540.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Huisingh R. The Elementary Word-R Test. A test of expressive vocabulary and semantics. East Moline, Ill.: LinguiSystems, Inc; 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Wong MN, Murdoch B, Whelan BM. Language disorders subsequent to mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI): evidence from four cases. Aphasiology 2010; 24: 1155-1169 DOI: 10.1080/02687030903168212.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wiig EH, Secord W. Test of Language Competence-Expanded Edition (TLC-E). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessments; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Frith M, Togher L, Ferguson A. et al. Assessment practices of speech-language pathologists for cognitive communication disorders following traumatic brain injury in adults: an international survey. Brain Inj 2014; 28: 1657-1666 DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2014.947619.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ellmo W, Graser J, Krchnavek B. et al. Measure of Cognitive-Linguistic Abilities (MCLA). Norcross, GA: The Speech Bin; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Scherrer K, Schrott K, Bertoni B. et al. MEC Testverfahren. Köln: ProLog; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Adamovich BB, Henderson J. SCATBI: Scales of Cognitive Ability for Traumatic Brain Injury. pro-ed; 1992
    PubMedGoogle Scholar