Aktuelle Dermatologie 2019; 45(12): 585-587
DOI: 10.1055/a-1010-3614
Eine Klinik im Blickpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Blaschkolinearer akantholytischer dyskeratotischer epidermaler Nävus bei einem Säugling

Differenzialdiagnostische Überlegungen und LiteraturreviewAcantholytic Dyskeratotic Epidermal Nevus in an InfantDifferential Diagnostic Considerations and Review of the Literature
C. S. L. Müller
Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie am Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar
,
T. Vogt
Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie am Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 December 2019 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Vorgestellt wird ein 3 Monate alter Säugling mit seit Geburt bestehenden linearen Hautveränderungen am Bein, welche sich histologisch als akantholytischer dyskeratotischer epidermaler Nävus (ADEN) bestätigen ließen. Zusammenfassend ist der ADEN eine seltene Malformation, welche unmittelbar nach Geburt klinisch auffällt und sich ausschließlich durch den histologischen Befund einer fokalen akantholytischen Dyskeratose beweisen lässt bzw. die übrigen histologischen Differenzialdiagnosen einer akantholytischen Dyskeratose durch die klinische Umfeldbefundung auszuschließen sind.

Abstract

We present a 3-month-old infant with linear lesions at the leg since birth, which could be confirmed histologically as acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus (ADEN). In summary, ADEN is a rare malformation, clinically striking immediately after birth and can be demonstrated only by the histological findings of focal acantholytic dyskeratosis and exclusion of other histological differential diagnoses of acantholytic dyskeratosis by the clinical findings.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Thibaut I, Bonafe JL. Acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus: a rare histopathologic feature. J Cutan Pathol 2002; 29: 52-54
  • 2 Su WP. Histopathologic varieties of epidermal nevus. A study of 160 cases. Am J Dermatopathol 1982; 4: 161-170
  • 3 Shaffer HC, Schosser R, Phillips C. Acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus with eccrine differentiation: a case report and review of literature. J Cutan Pathol 2009; 36: 1001-1004
  • 4 Akinshemoyin Vaughn O, Hinshaw MA, Teng JM. Acantholytic Dyskeratotic Epidermal Nevus. JAMA Dermatol 2015; 151: 1259-1260
  • 5 Cambiaghi S, Brusasco A, Grimalt R. et al. Acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus as a mosaic form of Darier's disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 284-286
  • 6 Fanti PA, Morelli R, Pompoli F. et al. [Acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus with a regional distribution]. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 1989; 124: 111-113
  • 7 Goldberg EI, Lefkovits AM, Sapadin AN. Zosteriform Darier’s disease versus acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus. Mt Sinai J Med 2001; 68: 339-341
  • 8 Huh WK, Fujiwara K, Takahashi H. et al. Congenital acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal naevus following Blaschko’s lines versus segmental Darier’s disease. Eur J Dermatol 2007; 17: 130-132
  • 9 Lee CH, Hsiao CH, Chiu HC. et al. Acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011; 77: 253
  • 10 Lee YI, Kim TG, Lee ST. et al. A Somatic p.Phe29del Mutation of Connexin 26 (GJB2) Manifesting as Acantholytic Dyskeratotic Epidermal Nevus. JAMA Dermatol 2019; DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5852.
  • 11 Micali G, Nasca MR, De Pasquale R. Linear acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus of the sole. Pediatr Dermatol 1999; 16: 166-168
  • 12 Venencie PY, Dallot A. [Acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus: a mosaic form of Darier’s disease?]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1999; 126: 829-830
  • 13 Youn M, Hann SK, Moon TK. et al. Acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus induced by ultraviolet B radiation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 301-304
  • 14 Elston DM. Zosteriform distribution of acantholytic dyskeratotic epidermal nevus?. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40: 647
  • 15 Garcia IE, Prado P, Pupo A. et al. Connexinopathies: a structural and functional glimpse. BMC Cell Biol 2016; 17 (Suppl. 01) 17
  • 16 Richard G. Connexin disorders of the skin. Clin Dermatol 2005; 23: 23-32
  • 17 Terrinoni A, Codispoti A, Serra V. et al. Connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations as a cause of the KID syndrome with hearing loss. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010; 395: 25-30
  • 18 Terrinoni A, Codispoti A, Serra V. et al. Connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations, causing KID Syndrome, are associated with cell death due to calcium gating deregulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010; 394: 909-914
  • 19 Ackerman AB. Focal acantholytic dyskeratosis. Arch Dermatol 1972; 106: 702-706
  • 20 Sakuntabhai A, Dhitavat J, Burge S. et al. Mosaicism for ATP2A2 mutations causes segmental Darier’s disease. J Invest Dermatol 2000; 115: 1144-1147
  • 21 Powell J, Sakuntabhai A, James M. et al. Grover’s disease, despite histological similarity to Darier’s disease, does not share an abnormality in the ATP2A2 gene. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143: 658
  • 22 Happle R. [Acanthokeratolytic epidermal nevus: acanthokeratolysis is hereditary, not the nevus]. Hautarzt 1990; 41: 117-118
  • 23 Ross R, DiGiovanna JJ, Capaldi L. et al. Histopathologic characterization of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: a systematic review of histology from the National Registry for Ichthyosis and Related Skin Disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: 86-90
  • 24 Messerschmidt A, Wolter M, Ter-Nedden J. et al. Multiple basal cell carcinomas arising in an epidermal nevus. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2016; 14: 1133-1135