Endoscopy 2019; 51(03): 279-280
DOI: 10.1055/a-0809-4814
E-Videos
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Use of an additional working channel for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR +)of a pedunculated sessile serrated adenoma in the sigmoid colon

Edris Wedi
Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Center of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
,
Richard F. Knoop
Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Center of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
,
Carlo Jung
Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Center of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
,
Volker Ellenrieder
Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Center of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
,
Steffen Kunsch
Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Center of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 January 2019 (online)

A 64-year-old man was admitted to our hospital after screening colonoscopy revealed multiple polyps including a tumor-suspicious lesion in the transverse colon. Ileocolonoscopy revealed a flat adenoma at the cecum and a colorectal tumor of the transverse colon in close proximity to the right colonic flexure. As an extended right hemicolectomy was considered the treatment of choice, neither lesion was removed during colonoscopy. In the rectosigmoid, however, an additional large pedunculated polyp (Paris 0-Ip, 2 × 1 × 5 cm) with a broad base was detected. Owing to the flat base, an unfavorable location behind a colonic fold, and high mobility of the polyp, a conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) procedure was difficult to perform. Consequently, we decided to perform a novel grasp-and-snare technique termed EMR + technique ([Video 1]).

Video 1 The endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with additional working channel (EMR + ) procedure for removal of a pedunculated serrated adenoma in the sigmoid colon. Source for graphical details in the video: Ovesco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen


Quality:

After submucosal injection of hydroxyethyl starch 6 % (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany), the polyp was successfully resected (Endocut Q 1/1/1) in toto with a 20 mm snare (Captivator II; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) after pulling the polyp with a standard grasper via an additional working channel (AWC) ([Fig. 1]) through the snare ([Fig. 2]). Histopathology revealed low grade dysplasia in a sessile serrated adenoma and R0 resection.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 The novel endoscope system. a The additional working channel (AWC) before installation. b The scope after installation of the AWC. c The working instruments through the AWC and the working channel. In addition, the position of the AWC can be changed at the distal end of the endoscope in order to vary the angle of the instruments.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Procedural steps of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with the additional working channel (EMR +). Source: Ovesco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen

Classical EMR is an established endoscopic procedure for resection of colonic polyps [1]. Nevertheless, large or laterally spreading lesions ≥ 2 cm can be challenging and, in fact, EMR often results in a piecemeal resection with unclear completeness of the resection base [2]. Recently, a commercially available system called EMR + was launched [3], where EMR is conducted with an AWC (Ovesco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen, Germany). The AWC is mounted at the tip of a standard gastroscope or pediatric colonoscope [3], resulting in a double-channel endoscope system that potentially improves the resection rate of challenging lesions by using the grasp-and-snare technique [4] [5]. By turning the cap, variable positions of both working channels (AWC plus standard channel) can be achieved. The EMR + technique using the AWC could be a practical and inexpensive method of overcoming the limitations of classical EMR and may enable intraluminal bimanual working for resections larger than ≥ 2 cm.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos

 
  • References

  • 1 Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-297
  • 2 Wang J, Zhang XH, Ge J. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 8282-8287
  • 3 Walter B, Schmidtbaur S, Hann A. et al. Improved endoscopic resection of large flat lesions using an external additional working channel (AWC). Endoscopy 2018; 50: S99
  • 4 Shetty A, Suarez AL, Dufault DL. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with grasp-and-snare technique for challenging lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 738-739
  • 5 von Renteln D, Schmidt A, Vassiliou MC. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection using a grasp-and-snare technique. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 475-480