Postoperative Bildgebung nach Gelenkersatz – Knie, Hüfte, Schulter

Nadja Saupe; Jose Romero; Otmar Hersche; Marco Zanetti

doi:10.1055/a-0659-4233

Radiopraxis, Table of Contents

Radiopraxis 2018; 11(03): E1-E19
DOI: 10.1055/a-0659-4233

CPD–Fortbildung

Postoperative Bildgebung nach Gelenkersatz – Knie, Hüfte, Schulter

Nadja Saupe

,

Jose Romero

,

Otmar Hersche

,

Marco Zanetti

Abstract

Die Gelenke an Knie, Hüfte und Schulter werden häufig und mit gutem Erfolg ersetzt. Mit der weiteren Zunahme dieser Operationen wächst auch die Bedeutung der postoperativen Bildgebung. Besonders Röntgen und CT werden für Routinekontrollen und zum Nachweis von Komplikationen eingesetzt. Die MRT kann – fortgeschrittene Techniken zur Reduktion von Metallartefakten vorausgesetzt – die um die Prothese liegenden Weichteile am besten darstellen.

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Annual Report. 2016 Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Im Internet: http://www.myknee.se/pdf/SVK_2016_Eng_1.0.pdf ; Stand: 18.10.2017
2 Fehring TK. O dum S. Griffin WL. et al. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 315-318
3 Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. et al. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Rel Res 2002; 404: 7-13
4 Naudie DD, Rorabeck CH. Sources of osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: wear of the bearing surface. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53: 251-259
5 Cadambi A, Engh GA, Dwyer KA. et al. Osteolysis of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 579-594
6 Peters PC jr, Engh GA, Dwyer KA. et al. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 864-876
7 Gupta SK, Chu A, Ranawat AS. et al. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 787-799
8 Manaster BJ. Total hip arthroplasty: imaging evaluation. J South Orthop Assoc 1998; 7: 95-108
9 Stähelin T, Kessler O, Pfirrmann C. et al. Fluoroscopically assisted stress radiography for varus-valgus stability assessment in flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 513-515
10 Romero J, Stähelin T, Binkert C. et al. The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 235-240
11 Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y. et al. Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 493-497
12 Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ. et al. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 286: 40-47
13 Suter T, Zanetti M, Schmid M. et al. Reproducibility of measurement of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty using computer tomography. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 744-748
14 OECD. Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators OECD-Publikation 2011. Im Internet: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/182669/umfrage/hueftgelenksoperationen-inausgewaehlten-oecd-laendern/ ; Stand: 18.10.2017
15 Bohm ER, Dunbar MJ, Frood JJ. et al. Rehospitalizations, early revisions, infections, and hospital resource use in the first year after hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 232-237.e1
16 Stumpe KD, Nötzli HP, Zanetti M. et al. FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and threephase bone scintigraphy. Radiology 2004; 231: 333-341
17 McGrory BJ, Etkin C, Lewallen D. Comparing contemporary revision burden among hip and knee joint. Arthroplast Today 2016; 2: 83-86
18 Wetters NG, Murray TG, Moric M. et al. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 410-416
19 Trampuz A, Zimmerli W. Diagnosis and treatment of implantassociated septic arthritis and osteomyelitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2008; 10: 394-403
20 Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ. AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline: diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18: 771-772
21 Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1645-1654
22 McKee GK. Total hip replacement – past, present and future. Biomaterials 1982; 3: 130-135
23 Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE. et al. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: 315-321
24 Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P. et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 847-851
25 Hersche O. Diagnosis and therapy of hip abductor insufficiency after hip arthroplasty. Orthopade 2011; 40: 506-512 . doi:10.1007/s00132-011-1760-3
26 Pean JE. Des moyens prosthetiques destines a obtenir la reparation de parties ossueses. Gaz Hop Paris 1894; 67: 291
27 Neer CS. 2nd. Articular replacement for the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1955; 37-A: 215-228
28 Boileau P, Melis B, Duperron D. et al. Revision surgery of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22: 1359-1370
29 De Wilde LF, Audenaert EA, Berghs BM. Shoulder protheses treating cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 1222-1230
30 Farshad M, Gerber C. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 1075-1082
31 Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D. et al. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 388-395
32 Falaise V, Levigne C, Favard L. ; SOFEC. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasties: the influence of glenometaphyseal angle. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011; 97 (6 Suppl): S131-S137
33 Lévigne C, Boileau P, Favard L. et al. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 925-935
34 Sadoghi P, Leithner A, Vavken P. et al. Infraglenoidal scapular notching in reverse total shoulder replacement: a prospective series of 60 cases and systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 101
35 Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA, Lohri E. et al. Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 588-600
36 Levigne C, Boileau P, Favard L. Scapular Notching. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D. , eds. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: clinical Results, Complications, Revision. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2006: 353-372
37 Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI. et al. Risk factors for revision after shoulder arthroplasty: 1825 shoulder arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 83-91
38 Molé D, Favard L. Excentered scapulohumeral osteoarthritis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2007; 93 (6 Suppl): 37-94
39 Walch G, Mottier F, Wall B. et al. Acromial insufficiency in reverse shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 495-502
40 Hargreaves BA, Worters PW, Pauly KB. et al. Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 547-555
41 Bachschmidt T, Lipps F, Nittka M. syngo WARP – Metal artifact reduction techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magnetom Flash 2012; 2: 24-25
42 Sutter R, Ulbrich EJ, Jellus V. et al. Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-Angle tilting MR imaging. Radiology 2012; 265: 204-214
43 Koch KM, Brau AC, Chen W. et al. Imaging near metal with a MAVRIC-SEMAC hybrid. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 71-82