Download PDF
Radiopraxis 2018; 11(03): E1-E19
DOI: 10.1055/a-0659-4233
CPD–Fortbildung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Postoperative Bildgebung nach Gelenkersatz – Knie, Hüfte, Schulter

Nadja Saupe
,
Jose Romero
,
Otmar Hersche
,
Marco Zanetti
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 September 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die Gelenke an Knie, Hüfte und Schulter werden häufig und mit gutem Erfolg ersetzt. Mit der weiteren Zunahme dieser Operationen wächst auch die Bedeutung der postoperativen Bildgebung. Besonders Röntgen und CT werden für Routinekontrollen und zum Nachweis von Komplikationen eingesetzt. Die MRT kann – fortgeschrittene Techniken zur Reduktion von Metallartefakten vorausgesetzt – die um die Prothese liegenden Weichteile am besten darstellen.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Annual Report. 2016 Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Im Internet: http://www.myknee.se/pdf/SVK_2016_Eng_1.0.pdf ; Stand: 18.10.2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fehring TK. O dum S. Griffin WL. et al. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 315-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. et al. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Rel Res 2002; 404: 7-13
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Naudie DD, Rorabeck CH. Sources of osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: wear of the bearing surface. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53: 251-259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cadambi A, Engh GA, Dwyer KA. et al. Osteolysis of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 579-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Peters PC jr, Engh GA, Dwyer KA. et al. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 864-876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gupta SK, Chu A, Ranawat AS. et al. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 787-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Manaster BJ. Total hip arthroplasty: imaging evaluation. J South Orthop Assoc 1998; 7: 95-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Stähelin T, Kessler O, Pfirrmann C. et al. Fluoroscopically assisted stress radiography for varus-valgus stability assessment in flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 513-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Romero J, Stähelin T, Binkert C. et al. The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 235-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y. et al. Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 493-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ. et al. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 286: 40-47
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Suter T, Zanetti M, Schmid M. et al. Reproducibility of measurement of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty using computer tomography. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 744-748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 OECD. Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators OECD-Publikation 2011. Im Internet: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/182669/umfrage/hueftgelenksoperationen-inausgewaehlten-oecd-laendern/ ; Stand: 18.10.2017
  • 15 Bohm ER, Dunbar MJ, Frood JJ. et al. Rehospitalizations, early revisions, infections, and hospital resource use in the first year after hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 232-237.e1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stumpe KD, Nötzli HP, Zanetti M. et al. FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and threephase bone scintigraphy. Radiology 2004; 231: 333-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 McGrory BJ, Etkin C, Lewallen D. Comparing contemporary revision burden among hip and knee joint. Arthroplast Today 2016; 2: 83-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wetters NG, Murray TG, Moric M. et al. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 410-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Trampuz A, Zimmerli W. Diagnosis and treatment of implantassociated septic arthritis and osteomyelitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2008; 10: 394-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ. AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline: diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18: 771-772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1645-1654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McKee GK. Total hip replacement – past, present and future. Biomaterials 1982; 3: 130-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE. et al. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: 315-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P. et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 847-851
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hersche O. Diagnosis and therapy of hip abductor insufficiency after hip arthroplasty. Orthopade 2011; 40: 506-512 . doi:10.1007/s00132-011-1760-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pean JE. Des moyens prosthetiques destines a obtenir la reparation de parties ossueses. Gaz Hop Paris 1894; 67: 291
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Neer CS. 2nd. Articular replacement for the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1955; 37-A: 215-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Boileau P, Melis B, Duperron D. et al. Revision surgery of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22: 1359-1370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 De Wilde LF, Audenaert EA, Berghs BM. Shoulder protheses treating cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 1222-1230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Farshad M, Gerber C. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 1075-1082
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D. et al. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 388-395
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Falaise V, Levigne C, Favard L. ; SOFEC. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasties: the influence of glenometaphyseal angle. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011; 97 (6 Suppl): S131-S137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lévigne C, Boileau P, Favard L. et al. Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 925-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sadoghi P, Leithner A, Vavken P. et al. Infraglenoidal scapular notching in reverse total shoulder replacement: a prospective series of 60 cases and systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA, Lohri E. et al. Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 588-600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Levigne C, Boileau P, Favard L. Scapular Notching. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Molé D. , eds. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: clinical Results, Complications, Revision. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2006: 353-372
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI. et al. Risk factors for revision after shoulder arthroplasty: 1825 shoulder arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 83-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Molé D, Favard L. Excentered scapulohumeral osteoarthritis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2007; 93 (6 Suppl): 37-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Walch G, Mottier F, Wall B. et al. Acromial insufficiency in reverse shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 495-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Hargreaves BA, Worters PW, Pauly KB. et al. Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 547-555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Bachschmidt T, Lipps F, Nittka M. syngo WARP – Metal artifact reduction techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magnetom Flash 2012; 2: 24-25
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Sutter R, Ulbrich EJ, Jellus V. et al. Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-Angle tilting MR imaging. Radiology 2012; 265: 204-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Koch KM, Brau AC, Chen W. et al. Imaging near metal with a MAVRIC-SEMAC hybrid. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 71-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar