The Polar® OH1 Optical Heart Rate Sensor is Valid during Moderate-Vigorous Exercise
received 26 December 2017
revised 02 April 2018
accepted 04 May 2018
17 June 2018 (online)
Purpose Traditional heart-rate monitoring through the use of electrocardiograms or chest-worn heart rate sensors can be challenging in certain sports or in field settings. New technologies, such as photoplethysmography (PPG), have enabled heart-rate monitoring at alternate sites. However, to date, the accuracy and validity of various PPG sensors has not been examined in detail. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the validity of an arm-worn PPG sensor during yoga sequences.
Methods Fifteen college-aged men and women participated in a ~45 min power vinyasa yoga class. During the class, participants wore Polar® H7 chest straps and RCX3 receivers (criterion) and Polar® OH1 arm bands on their upper right arm (practical). Mean differences were compared via a paired t-test, heart rate during yoga using a time*device repeated measures ANOVA, and agreement assessed with Bland-Altman analysis.
Results Mean heart rates during yoga were not different (mean difference=0.76, 95% CI: –0.54 to 2.06; p=0.229). Yoga created a main effect of time on heart rate (p<0.0001), but there was no difference between devices (p=0.86) or interaction (p=0.90). Mean bias±95% limits of agreement was 0.76±1.30 bpm, with a typical error of 2.42±1.49 bpm and a coefficient of variation of 1.8±1.5%.
Conclusions Results of the present investigation revealed that the Polar® OH1 is a valid measure of heart rate during moderate-vigorous exercise. Future validation studies should consider other exercise modes and participant characteristics.
- 1 Abt G, Bray J, Benson AC. The validity and inter-device variability of the Apple Watch for measuring maximal heart rate. J Sports Sci 2017; 10.1080/02640414.2017.1397282 1-6
- 2 Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations. Sports Med 2003; 33: 517-538
- 3 Boudreaux BD, Hebert EP, Hollander DB, Williams BM, Cormier CL, Naquin MR, Gillan WW, Gusew EE, Kraemer RR. Validity of wearable activity monitors during cycling and resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2018; 50: 624-633
- 4 Gillinov S, Etiwy M, Wang R, Blackburn G, Phelan D, Gillinov AM, Houghtaling P, Javadikasgari H, Desai MY. Variable accuracy of wearable heart rate nonitors during aerobic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017; 49: 1697-1703
- 5 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
- 6 Hopkins WG. Spreadsheets for analysis of validity and reliability. Sportscience 2015; 19: 36-42
- 7 Jo E, Lewis K, Directo D, Kim MJ, Dolezal BA. Validation of biofeedback wearables for photoplethysmographic heart rate tracking. J Sports Sci Med 2016; 15: 540-547
- 8 Larson-Meyer DE. A systematic review of the energy cost and metabolic intensity of yoga. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48: 1558-1569
- 9 Laukkanen RM, Virtanen PK. Heart rate monitors: state of the art. J Sports Sci 1998; 16 Suppl S3-S7
- 10 Pate JL, Buono MJ. The physiological responses to Bikram yoga in novice and experienced practitioners. Altern Ther Health Med 2014; 20: 12-18
- 11 Spierer DK, Rosen Z, Litman LL, Fujii K. Validation of photoplethysmography as a method to detect heart rate during rest and exercise. J Med Eng Technol 2015; 39: 264-271
- 12 Stahl SE, An HS, Dinkel DM, Noble JM, Lee JM. How accurate are the wrist-based heart rate monitors during walking and running activities? Are they accurate enough?. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2016; 2: e000106
- 13 Temko A. Accurate heart rate nonitoring during physical exercises using PPG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2017; 64: 2016-2024
- 14 Thompson WR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2018: The CREP Edition. ACMS Health Fit J 2017; 21: 10-19
- 15 Wallen MP, Gomersall SR, Keating SE, Wisloff U, Coombes JS. Accuracy of heart rate watches: implications for weight management. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0154420
- 16 Zhang Z. Heart rate monitoring from wrist-type photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals during intensive physical exercise. In, 2014 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP); 2014; 698–702