Download PDF
Homeopathy 2016; 105(03): 233-239
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2016.02.005
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2016

Survey on hand gestures relevance in patient practitioner communication: a homeopathic example

Max Escher
1   Institute for Integrative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Gerhard-Kienle-Weg 4, 58313 Herdecke, Germany
,
Arndt Büssing
1   Institute for Integrative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Gerhard-Kienle-Weg 4, 58313 Herdecke, Germany
,
Thomas Ostermann
1   Institute for Integrative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Gerhard-Kienle-Weg 4, 58313 Herdecke, Germany
2   Department of Clinical Psychology, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50, 58448 Witten, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received20 June 2015
revised13 February 2016

accepted29 February 2016

Publication Date:
22 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Background: Gestures play an important role in medical communication.

Methods: 94 homeopaths (Mean age 49.6 years, 20% male) completed a 20-item questionnaire on utilization and relevance of gestures in patients’ symptom description.

Results: After excluding nine items due to low validity (n = 4) or low item total correlation (n = 5), factor analysis of the questionnaire resulted in the following three dimensions explaining 66.6% of variance: ‘Hand gestures in relation to verbal expressions’ (5 items; Cronbach’s α = 0.81), ‘Hand Gestures describing the experience of bodily and mental symptoms’ (4 items; Cronbach’s α = 0.74) and ‘practitioners’ behavior and active attitude in observing hand gestures’ (2 items; Cronbach’s α = 0.86).

Conclusion: The survey shows how homeopathic therapists view patients’ hand gestures, whether they use these diagnostically and how this relates to their homeopathic practice. Practitioners with only homeopathic influence on this topic are highly congruent to findings on hand gestures from other domains.

Keywords

Hand gestures - Patient–practitioner communication - Survey
 

  • References

  • 1 Thompson E.A., Geraghty J. The vital sensation of the minerals: reducing uncertainty in homeopathic prescribing. Homeopathy 96 (02) 2007; 102-107.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sankaran R. The evolution of my practice. Homoeopath Links 20 (01) 2007; 11-14.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Holling A. Beitrag zur Diskussion des Bamberger Beschlusses 2008 bezüglich der Rolle der Arzneimittelprüfung. Grundsatzdiskussion über die neuen Methoden von Scholten und Sankaran. AHZ 255 (01) 2010; 24-27.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sankaran R. The sensation in homeopathy. Homeopathy Pract 2005; 57.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sankaran R. Sensation refined. 2007. Homoeopathic Medical Publishers; 432.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Chauhan D. Internal focusing – to explore the vital sensation. Homoeopath Links 19 (01) 2006; 17-21.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chauhan D. “Locked in a cage” – a case of Lac leoninum. Homoeopath Links 20 (04) 2007; 187-192.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Joshi S., Joshi B. Case of discombobulation. Homoeopath Links 22 (01) 2009; 38-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Oak P.A. Importance of hand gestures – a case of cactus grandiflora. Homoeopath Links 21 (04) 2008; 192-194.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rowe T. Nature vs. nurture in homeopathy: toward an environmental view of homeopathic space. Homoeopath Links 20 (04) 2007; 196-200.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Vithoulkas G. British media attacks on homeopathy: are they justified?. Homeopathy 97 (02) 2008; 103-106.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Roter D., Frankel R., Hall J., Sluyter D. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. J Gen Intern Med 21 (01) 2006; S28-S34.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Escher M., Ostermann T. Spontaneous co-speech hand gestures in patients’ complaint presentation and pain description. A systematic review. ECIM 2011. Berlin.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Heath C. Demonstrative suffering: the gestural (re) embodiment of symptoms. J Commun 52 (03) 2002; 597-616.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hyden L., Peolsson M. Pain gestures: the orchestration of speech and body gestures. Health 6 (03) 2002; 325.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Vaysse J. La sémiotique des gestes centrés sur le corps et leurs implications langagières dans le site médical. Semiotica 91 (04) 1992; 319-340.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Vaysse J. La gestualité en consultation cardiologique. Cosnier J., Grosjean M., Lacoste M. Soins et communication, approches interactionnistes des relations de soins. 1993. Presse Universitaire de Lyon; Lyon: 99-120.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Vaysse J. Les Rôles Spécifiques De La Gestualité Et Ses Implications Psycho-Corporelles En Clinique. 2005.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Rowbotham S., Holler J., Lloyd D., Wearden A. How do we communicate about pain? A systematic analysis of the semantic contribution of co-speech gestures in pain-focused conversations. J Nonverbal Behav 36 (01) 2012; 1-21.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Heath C., Nicholls K. Body movement and speech in medical interaction. 1986. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge.:
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Sator M. Irgendwie schwierig das zu differenzieren! Schmerzdifferenzierung – Eine gesprächsanalytische Untersuchung ärztlicher Erstgespräche an der Kopfschmerzambulanz. 2009. Wien.
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Shah N. Fallaufnahme und Analyse. AHZ 249 2004; 125-133.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Streeck U. Gestik und die therapeutische Beziehung. 2009. Vol. 1 W. Kohlhammer Verlag; Stuttgart: 91.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Stukenbrock A. “Wo ist der Hauptschmerz?” – Zeigen am eigenen Körper in der medizinischen Kommunikation. Gesprächsforschung 9 2008; 1-33.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Beach W., LeBaron C. Body disclosures: attending to personal problems and reported sexual abuse during a medical encounter. J Commun 52 (03) 2002; 617-639.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fleisch G. Right in their hands: how gestures imply the body’s next steps. Focus Connect (04) 2007; 24.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hanada R., Furuyama N., Inoue M. Speech-gesture mismatch and how it changes in a problem described by a client. 3rd Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies (ISGS) 2007.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Petitmengin C., Navarro V., Le Van Quyen M. Anticipating seizure: pre-reflective experience at the center of neuro-phenomenology. Conscious Cognit 16 (03) 2007; 746-764.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 McNeill D. Gesture and thought. 2005. University of Chicago Press.;
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Gostynski E. A clinical contribution to the analysis of gestures. Int J Psychoanal 32 1951; 310-318.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Streeck J., Grothues J., Villanueva J. Thinking by hand, in Gesturecraft: the manu-facture of meaning. 2009. John Benjamins Publishing Company; 151-177.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Vervarcke A. The coherent pattern. Homoeopath Links 22 (04) 2009; 180,183.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Albarran J., Durham B., Chappel G., Dwight J., Gowers J. Are manual gestures, verbal descriptors and pain radiation as reported by patients reliable indicators of myocardial infarction? Preliminary findings and implications. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 16 (02) 2000; 98-110.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gillies M. Great balls of fire. Homoeopath Links 21 (01) 2008; 16-20.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sneevliet A. Euphorbiaceae–“little words” and hand gestures. Homoeopath Links 25 (04) 2012; 225-228.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Heudorf U., Carstens A., Exner M. Heilpraktiker und öffentliches Gesundheitswesen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforsch – Gesundheitsschutz 53 (02) 2010; 245-257.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hearnshaw H. Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. BMJ 328 7432 2004; 140-141.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Rowbotham S, Holler J, Lloyd D, Wearden A. The semantic interplay of speech and co-speech gestures during pain communication. In: 4th Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies ISGS, 2010. European University Viadrina Frankfurt/Oder. p. 347.
    PubMed
  • 39 Edmondstone W.M. Cardiac chest pain: does body language help the diagnosis?. BMJ 311 7021 1995; 1660-1661.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Martin W.B. The patient’s use of gestures in the diagnosis of coronary insufficiency disease. Minn Med 40 (10) 1957; 691-737.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Stowers M., Short D. Warning symptoms before major myocardial infarction. Br Med J 32 (06) 1970; 833.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Peterson P. An investigation of sex differences in regard to nonverbal body gestures. Eakins B., Eakins G., Lieb-Brilhard B. Siscom ’75: women’s (and men’s) communication. 1976; 20-27.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Briton N.J., Hall J.A. Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles 32 (12) 1995; 79-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rowbotham S., Holler J., Lloyd D., Wearden A. Handling pain: the semantic interplay of speech and co-speech hand gestures in the description of pain sensations. Speech Commun 57 2014; 244-256.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Gerwing J., Dalby A.M.L. Gestures convey content: an exploration of the semantic functions of physicians’ gestures. Patient Educ Couns 96 (03) 2014; 308-314.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Robinson J.D. Getting down to business talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor-patient consultations. Hum Commun Res 25 (01) 1998; 97-123.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar