CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Homeopathy 2008; 97(02): 103-106
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2008.02.004
Debate
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2008

British media attacks on homeopathy: Are they justified?

George Vithoulkas

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Received25 January 2008
revised18 February 2008

accepted18 February 2008

Publication Date:
20 December 2017 (online)

Homeopathy is being attacked by the British media. These attacks draw support from irresponsible and unjustified claims by certain teachers of homeopathy. Such claims include the use of ‘dream’ and ‘imaginative’ methods for provings. For prescribing some such teachers attempt to replace the laborious process of matching symptom picture and remedy with spurious theories based on ‘signatures’, sensations and other methods. Other irresponsible claims have also been made. These “new ideas” risk destroying the principles, theory, and practice of homeopathy.

 
  • References

  • 1 Scholten J. Homoeopathy and minerals. Utrecht: Stichting Alonissos; 1993. p 23.
  • 2 Scholten J. Homoeopathy and minerals. Utrecht: Stichting Alonissos; 1993. p 289.
  • 3 Sankaran R. Provings: similia similibus curentur. Bombay: Homeopathic Medical Publishers; 1998. [Introduction].
  • 4 Sherr J. The dynamics and methodology of homoeopathic provings, Types of provings. West Malvern; 1994, pp 16–17.
  • 5 Norland M. Homoeopath Links 2000; 13: 138-142.
  • 6 Scholten J. Interhomeopathy, Theory of provings, October 2007.
  • 7 Sankaran R. Provings: similia similibus curentur. Bombay: Homeopathic Medical Publishers; 1998. [Coca cola].
  • 8 Sherr J. Proving of hydrogen. West Malvern: 1992.
  • 9 Herrick N. Animal mind, human voices: provings of eight new animal remedies. Hahnemann Clinic Publishing; 1998.
  • 10 Hahnemann S. Organon of medicine. 6th edn. B. Jain Publishers; 1982. p 114.
  • 11 Hahnemann S. Organon of medicine. 6th edn. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers; 1982. pp 198–203.
  • 12 Nauman E. Homoeopath Links 2000; 13: 193-194.
  • 13 Sankaran R. The spirit of homoeopathy. Bombay: R. Sankaran; 1991. p 6.
  • 14 Sehgal M.L. Rediscovery of homeopathy. Delhi: Sehgal Brothers; 1992. p 33.
  • 15 Scholten J. Homoeopathy and the elements. Introduction – the group analysis method Utrecht: Stichting Alonissos; 1996.
  • 16 Sankaran R. The substance of homoeopathy. The natural classification of drugs Bombay: Homepathic Medical Publishers; 1994. p 101.
  • 17 Dudgeon R.E. The lesser writings of Hahnemann. Essay on a new principle for ascertaining the curative powers of drugs, with a few glances at those hitherto employed New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers; 1987. p 255.
  • 18 Sankaran R. There is no two, an interview by Tessler N. Similimum the Journal of the Homepathic Academy of Naturopathic Physicians winter 2003
  • 19 Neesgaard P. Hypothesis collection – primary psora and miasmatic dynamic, Encyclopedia homoeopathica, v. 2.2.2., 2007.
  • 20 Sankaran R. The sensation in homeopathy. Bombay: Homeopathic Medical Publishers; 2004.
  • 21 Golden I. An energetic model of homeopathy. Homoeopath Links Summer 2007; 20: 86.
  • 22 Chappell P. The second similimum. Haren: Homeolinks Publishers; 2005.
  • 23 Sankaran R. The substance of homeopathy. Imponderabilia – a proving of music Bombay: Homeopathic Medical Publishers; 1994. p 238.
  • 24 Clarke John H. New Delhi: B. Jain Publishers; Practical materia medica. vol. 2. 1986. p 320.
  • 25 Chappell P, van der Zee H, Hiwat C. <www.healingdownloads.com>.