Evaluation of the Content Coverage of SNOMED CT Representing ICNP Seven-axis Version 1 Concepts

H. A. Park; C. Lundberg; A. Coenen; D. Konicek

doi:10.3414/ME11-01-0004

Methods of Information in Medicine, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Methods Inf Med 2011; 50(05): 472-478
DOI: 10.3414/ME11-01-0004

Special Topic – Original Articles

Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of the Content Coverage of SNOMED CT Representing ICNP Seven-axis Version 1 Concepts

H. A. Park

¹Research Institute of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Interdisciplinary Program of Medical Informatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

,

C. Lundberg

²SNOMED Terminology Solutions, Deerfield, Illinois, USA

,

A. Coenen

³School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

,

D. Konicek

²SNOMED Terminology Solutions, Deerfield, Illinois, USA

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Summary

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms) to represent the concepts of the ICNP version 1 – the seven-axis model.

Methods: The first author mapped 1658 concepts of the ICNP version 1 to SNOMED CT using CLUE browser 5.0. The second author from SNOMED Terminology Solutions – with a team of SNOMED CT experts – and the third author from the ICN with a team of ICNP experts validated the mapping result. If there was any disagreement during the validation process, the three of us convened online meetings to reach a consensus.

Results: In total, SNOMED CT covered 1331 out of 1658 (80%) ICNP seven-axis model concepts ranging from a 61% coverage rate of the Actions Axis concepts to a 94% coverage rate of the Judgment axis concepts.

Conclusions: SNOMED CT can represent most (80%) of the ICNP version 1 concepts. However, improvements in the ICNP version 1 in terms of concept naming and definition, and the addition of missing concepts to SNOMED CT, would lead to a greater harmonization of the ICNP seven-axis model version 1 concepts with SNOMED CT.

Keywords

Nursing - terminology - SNOMED CT - ICNP - semantics

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Aspden P, Corrigan JM, Wolcott J, Erickson SM. editors. The Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press. Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2003
2 American Health Information Management Association and American Medical Informatics Association Terminology and Classification Policy Task Force.. Healthcare Terminologies and Classifications: An Action Agenda for the United States. 2006 . Cited Nov 11, 2009. Available from: https://-www.amia.org/files/terminologiesandclassifications.pdf
3 Wiesenthal AM. Kaiser Permanente Health Connect – EHR and SNOMED. Cited Mar 28, 2009. Available from: http://www.slideshare.net/HINZ/kaiser-permanente-healthconnect-ehr-andsnomed/
4 Simpson RL. ICNP: The language of worldwide nursing. Nursing Management 2007; 38 (02) 15 18.
5 SNOMED CT® to ICD-9-CM Rule Based Mapping to Support Reimbursement.. Cited Jan 10, 2011. Available from http://www.nlm.nih.govresearch/umls/mapping_projects/snomedct_to_icd9cm_reimburse.html
6 Cross mapping – NHS Connecting for health.. Cited Jan 10, 2011. Available from http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/data/clinicalcoding/suppliers/cross-mapping
7 Westra BL, Bauman R, Delaney CW, Lundberg CB, Petersen C. Validation of concept mapping between PNDS and SNOMED CT. AORN J 2008; 87 (06) 1217-1229.
8 Lu DF, Eichmann D, Konicek D, Park HT, Ucharattana P, Delaney C. Standardized nursing language in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: A cross-mapping validation method. Comput Inform Nurs 2006; 24 (05) 288-296.
9 Lu DF, Park HT, Ucharattana P, Konicek D, Delaney C. Nursing outcomes classification in the systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: a cross-mapping validation. Comput Inform Nurs 2007; 25 (03) 159-170.
10 International Council of Nurses.. ICNP version 1. Geneva: International Council of Nurses; 2005
11 International Council of Nurses.. Guideline for ICNP Catalogue Development. Geneva: International Council of Nurses; 2008
12 International Council of Nurses.. ICN and SNOMED Further Collaboration. Press Release. October 9, 2006. Cited Nov 26, 2008. Available from: http://www.icn.ch/PR16_06.htm
13 Wang Y, Patrick J, Miller G, O‘Halloran J. Linguistic Mapping of Terminologies to SNOMED CT. Proceedings of the SMCS 2006 – Semantic Mining Conference on SNOMED CT; 2006 Sep 10; Copenhagen. Copenhagen: Network of Excellence Semantic Mining; 2006 . Cited Dec 14, 2009. Available from: http://www.hiww.org/smcs2006/proceedings/6WangSMCS2006final.pdf
14 Avesani P, Giunchiglia F, Yatskevich M. A Large Scale Taxonomy Mapping Evaluation. In: Gil Y. et al, editors. Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conferences. 2005. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2005. pp 67-81.
15 Doerr M. Semantic Problems of Thesaurus Mapping. Journal of Digital Information 2001 ; 1 (8). Cited Mar 28, 2009. Available from: http://jodi.tamu.edu/Articles/v01/i08/Doerr
16 Elkin PL, Brown SH, Husser CS, Bauer BA, Wahner-Roedler D, Rosenbloom ST, Speroff T. Evaluation of the content coverage of SNOMED CT: Ability of SNOMED clinical terms to represent clinical problem lists. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81 (06) 741-748.
17 Park HA, Lundberg CB, Coenen A, Konicek DJ. Evaluation of the content coverage of SNOMED CT to represent ICNP version 1 catalogues. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 146: 303-307.