ABSTRACT
Face-lift surgery is becoming very common. The number of techniques and the expected results from those techniques vary greatly. Often it is confusing to patients and surgeons what is meant when the term face-lift is used. This article then analyzes two specific face-lift techniques, noting differences in patient selection, technique, result, and healing time.
KEYWORDS
Short incision - short flap face-lift - deep plane face-lift
REFERENCES
-
1 Skoog T. Plastic surgery: the aging face. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. Philadelphia, PA; WB Saunders 1974: 300-330
-
2
Mitz V, Peyronnie M.
The superficial musculoapaneurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1976;
58
80-88
-
3
Hamra S T.
The deep plane rhytidectomy.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1990;
86
53-61
-
4
Hamra S T.
Composite rhytidectomy.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1992;
90
1-13
-
5
Ramirez O M.
The subperiosteal rhytidectomy: the third generation face lift.
Ann Plast Surg.
1992;
28
218-232
-
6
Fuente del Campo A.
Face lift without preauricular scars.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1993;
92
642-653
-
7
Zager W H, Dyer W K.
Minimal incision facelift.
Facial Plast Surg.
2005;
21
21-27
-
8
Hamilton J M.
Serial plication facelift.
Aesth Plast Surg.
1998;
22
304-308
-
9
Litner J A, Adamson P A.
Limited vs extended face-lift techniques.
Arch Facial Plast Surg.
2006;
8
186-190
-
10
Kamer F M, Frankel A S.
SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1998;
102
878-881
John R Coleman Jr.M.D.
Atlanta Center for Facial Plastic Surgery
3193 Howell Mill Road, Suite 215, Atlanta, GA 30327
