Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2729-1189
Fetal Heart Rate Tracings and Adverse Outcomes among Term Small versus Appropriate for Gestational Age
Authors
Funding Information The authors report no financial support or external funding.
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to compare the patterns of fetal heart rate tracings (FHRTs), and outcomes among individuals with small (birth weight [BW] <10% for gestational age [GA]; SGA) versus appropriate (BW at 10–89% for GA; AGA) newborns at term (≥37.0 weeks).
Study Design
Our retrospective cohort study included consecutive deliveries over 15 months at a level IV center. FHRTs were reviewed by obstetricians blinded to maternal and neonatal outcomes. The inclusion criteria were non-anomalous singletons, cataloged as SGA or AGA birth weight using Alexander et al's nomogram. In 20-minute segments, the last 120 minutes of tracing were characterized. Rates of cesarean delivery (CD) and composite neonatal adverse outcomes (CNAOs) were compared.
Results
Of 5,160 deliveries, 3,029 (58.7%) met the inclusion criteria, and among them, 422 (13.9%) were SGA and 2,607 (86.1%) AGA. There were no differences in FHRT baseline, variability, or accelerations. Compared to AGA, SGA was more likely to have prolonged decelerations (11.8 vs. 8.4%, p = 0.021), and recurrent decelerations with ≥50% of contractions (21.3 vs. 16.5%, p = 0.014). Overall, the presence of category II FHRT or not was similar between the SGA (91.2%) and AGA (88.5%; p = 0.097). Persistent category II FHRT was significantly more common among SGA (37.4%) than AGA (28.1%; aOR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.47–1.82) newborns. The rate of CD for non-reassuring FHRT was similar among the two groups. CNAO occurred in 1.4% in both SGA and AGA neonates (p = 0.95).
Conclusion
In our cohort of those with fetal monitoring prior to delivery at ≥37 weeks, persistent category II FHRT at the end of labor was significantly more common in SGA compared to AGA neonates; however, composite neonatal morbidity did not differ between the two groups. Our analysis provides data for shared decision-making that among SGA newborns, abnormalities of FHRT are not linked with adverse outcomes.
Key Points
-
There were no differences in FHRT baseline, variability, or accelerations between AGA and SGA.
-
SGA was more likely to have prolonged decelerations and recurrent decelerations with ≥50% of contractions.
-
Persistent category II FHRT before delivery is significantly more common with SGA than AGA.
-
FHRT abnormalities, however, were not associated with CD for non-reassuring FHRT, or adverse outcomes.
Keywords
fetal heart rate tracings - small for gestational age - maternal outcomes - neonatal outcomesNote
This study was presented at the SMFM 2025 January 30 to February 1 in Denver, Colorado, United States.
Publication History
Received: 28 August 2025
Accepted: 21 October 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
24 October 2025
Article published online:
06 November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 116: management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (05) 1232-1240
- 2 Chen HY, Chauhan SP, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM, Abuhamad AZ. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204 (06) 491.e1-491.e10
- 3 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 227: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2021 137 02
- 4 Mendez-Figueroa H, Truong VTT, Pedroza C, Khan AM, Chauhan SP. Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (05) 628.e1-628.e7
- 5 Chauhan SP, Weiner SJ, Saade GR. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Intrapartum fetal heart rate tracing among small-for-gestational age compared with appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (04) 1019-1025
- 6 Crequit S, Tataru C, Coste E. et al. Association of fetal heart rate short term variability pattern during term labor with neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age status. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 278: 77-89
- 7 Gagnon R, Hunse C, Bocking AD. Fetal heart rate patterns in the small-for-gestational-age human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161 (03) 779-784
- 8 D'Hooghe TM, Odendaal HJ. Fewer accelerations and decreased long term variability in the heart rate of small for gestational age fetuses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991; 35 (02) 133-138
- 9 Graatsma EM, Mulder EJH, Vasak B. et al. Average acceleration and deceleration capacity of fetal heart rate in normal pregnancy and in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25 (12) 2517-2522
- 10 Cagino KA, Wiley RL, Roberts AW, Zullo F, Mendez-Figueroa H, Chauhan SP. Proportion of time in category II fetal heart rate tracing and adverse outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2025; 1 (42) 1-7
- 11 Wiley RL, Roberts AW, Cagino KA, Zullo F, Mendez-Figueroa H, Chauhan SP. Characteristics and categories of fetal heart rate tracings and adverse neonatal outcomes at term. Am J Perinatol 2025; . Epub ahead of print
- 12 Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH. 1994-1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Matern Child Health J 1999; 3 (04) 225-231
- 13 Narendran LM, Mendez-Figueroa H, Chauhan SP. et al. Predictors of neonatal brachial plexus palsy subsequent to resolution of shoulder dystocia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (25) 5443-5449
- 14 Parer JT, Ikeda T. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197 (01) 26.e1-26.e6
- 15 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
- 16 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2023. Accessed October 31, 2025 at: https://www.R-project.org/
- 17 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (12) 1495-1499
- 18 Chauhan SP, Taylor M, Shields D, Parker D, Scardo JA, Magann EF. Intrauterine growth restriction and oligohydramnios among high-risk patients. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24 (04) 215-221
- 19 Rhoades JS, Rampersad RM, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Stout MJ. Delivery outcomes after term induction of labor in small-for-gestational age fetuses. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (06) 544-549
- 20 Kugelman N, Sagi-Dain L, Kleifeld S. et al. Can recurrent cesarean section due to arrest of descent be predicted by newborn weight difference?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 245: 73-76
- 21 Larkin JC, Chauhan SP, Simhan HN. Small for gestational age: the differential mortality when detected versus undetected antenatally. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (04) 409-414
- 22 Chauhan SP, Beydoun H, Chang E. et al. Prenatal detection of fetal growth restriction in newborns classified as small for gestational age: correlates and risk of neonatal morbidity. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (03) 187-194
- 23 Mattioli KP, Sanderson M, Chauhan SP. Inadequate identification of small-for-gestational-age fetuses at an urban teaching hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 109 (02) 140-143
- 24 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (01) 192-202
- 25 ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 10: intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: interpretation and management. Obstet Gynecol 2025; 146 (04) 583-599
- 26 Mlynarczyk M, Chauhan SP, Baydoun HA. et al. The clinical significance of an estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile: a comparison of outcomes of <5th vs 5th-9th percentile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217 (02) 198.e1-198.e11
- 27 Chauhan SP, Rouse DJ, Ananth CV. et al. Screening for intrauterine growth restriction in uncomplicated pregnancies: time for action. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30 (01) 33-39
- 28 Ashimi Balogun O, Sibai BM, Pedroza C, Blackwell SC, Barrett TL, Chauhan SP. Serial third-trimester ultrasonography compared with routine care in uncomplicated pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (06) 1358-1367
- 29 Roberts AW, Hotra J, Soto E. et al. Indicated vs universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies: a pre-post-intervention study. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2024; 6 (05) 101373 . Erratum in: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Jul;6(7):101389
- 30 Chen HY, Chauhan SP. Macrosomic newborns delivered at term after labor among nondiabetic women: maternal and neonatal morbidities. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (02) 150-157
- 31 Jenner ZB, O'Neil Dudley AE, Mendez-Figueroa H, Ellis VS, Chen HY, Chauhan SP. Morbidity associated with fetal macrosomia among women with diabetes mellitus. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (05) 515-520
- 32 Heywood RE, Magann EF, Rich DL, Chauhan SP. The detection of macrosomia at a teaching hospital. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26 (02) 165-168
- 33 Chauhan SP, Laye MR, Lutgendorf M. et al. A multicenter assessment of 1,177 cases of shoulder dystocia: lessons learned. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (05) 401-406
- 34 Chen HY, Blackwell SC, Chauhan SP. Association between Apgar score at 5 minutes and adverse outcomes among low-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (07) 1344-1351
- 35 Chen HY, Chauhan SP. Apgar score at 10 minutes and adverse outcomes among low-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (25) 7109-7118
- 36 Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (06) 513-523
- 37 Blackwell SC, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Hutchinson M, Gyamfi Bannerman C. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate interpretation system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (04) 378.e1-378.e5
