Endoscopy 2022; 54(02): 180-184
DOI: 10.1055/a-1372-0419
Innovations and brief communications

Performance of a new integrated computer-assisted system (CADe/CADx) for detection and characterization of colorectal neoplasia

Jochen Weigt
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v. Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
,
Alessandro Repici
2   Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Milan, Italy
3   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
,
Giulio Antonelli
4   Gastroenterology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
,
Ahmed Afifi
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v. Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
,
Leon Kliegis
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v. Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
,
Loredana Correale
2   Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Milan, Italy
,
Cesare Hassan
4   Gastroenterology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
,
5   Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
6   GastroZentrum Lippe, Interventional Endoscopy, Bad Salzuflen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Abstract

Background Use of artificial intelligence may increase detection of colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy by improving lesion recognition (CADe) and reduce pathology costs by improving optical diagnosis (CADx).

Methods A multicenter library of ≥ 200 000 images from 1572 polyps was used to train a combined CADe/CADx system. System testing was performed on two independent image sets (CADe: 446 with polyps, 234 without; CADx: 267) from 234 polyps, which were also evaluated by six endoscopists (three experts, three non-experts).

Results CADe showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.9 %, 90.6 %, and 91.7 %, respectively. Experts showed significantly higher accuracy and specificity, and similar sensitivity, while non-experts + CADe showed comparable sensitivity but lower specificity and accuracy than CADe and experts. CADx showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.0 %, 79.4 %, and 83.6 %, respectively. Experts showed comparable performance, whereas non-experts + CADx showed comparable accuracy but lower specificity than CADx and experts.

Conclusions The high accuracy shown by CADe and CADx was similar to that of experts, supporting further evaluation in a clinical setting. When using CAD, non-experts achieved a similar performance to experts, with suboptimal specificity.

Appendix 1s, Tables 1s, 2s, Fig. 1s



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 25. Januar 2021

Accepted Manuscript online:
25. Januar 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany