Int J Sports Med 2008; 29(12): 980-986
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038759
Training & Testing

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Interrupted vs. Uninterrupted Training on BMD during Growth

B. M. Goettsch1 , M. Z. Smith1 , J. A. O'Brien1 , G. V. Gomez1 , S. V. Jaque2 , K. D. Sumida1
  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, California, United States
  • 2Department of Kinesiology, California State University Northridge, Northridge, California, United States
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision May 31, 2008

Publication Date:
09 July 2008 (online)

Abstract

This study compared a resistance training program where the exercise was uninterrupted (UT, i.e., continuous repetitions) against a resistance training program where the exercise was interrupted (IT, i.e., 3 exercise sessions during a training day) for enhancing bone modeling and bone mineral density (BMD) in maturating animals. The total volume of work performed between the two resistance training programs was equivalent by design. 24 young male rats were randomly divided into Control (Con, n = 8), UT (n = 8) and IT (n = 8) resistance trained groups. The UT and IT groups were conditioned to climb a vertical ladder with weights appended to their tail 3 days/wk for 6 wks. After the 6-wk program, serum osteocalcin was not significantly different between groups, whereas the adjusted urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) was significantly lower for both UT (81.03 ± 5.53) and IT (88.30 ± 7.29) compared to Con (128.13 ± 9.99). Tibial BMD (assessed via DXA) was significantly greater for UT (0.222 ± 0.005 g/cm2) and IT (0.219 ± 0.003 g/cm2) when compared to Con (0.205 ± 0.004 g/cm2). There was no significant difference in DPD or BMD between UT and IT groups. The results indicate that both interrupted and continuous, uninterrupted resistance training programs were equally effective in stimulating bone modeling.

References

  • 1 Bassey E J, Ramsdale S J. Increase in femoral bone density in young women following high-impact exercise.  Osteoporos Int. 1994;  4 72-75
  • 2 Bradney M, Pearce G, Naughton G, Sullivan C, Bass S, Beck T, Carlson J, Seeman E. Moderate exercise during growth in prepubertal boys: changes in bone mass, size, volumetric density, and bone strength: a controlled prospective study.  J Bone Min Res. 1998;  13 1814-1821
  • 3 Burr D B, Robling A G, Turner C H. Effects of biomechanical stress on bones in animals.  Bone. 2002;  30 781-786
  • 4 Creighton D L, Morgan A L, Boardley D, Brolinson P G. Weight-bearing exercise and markers of bone turnover in female athletes.  J Appl Physiol. 2001;  90 565-570
  • 5 Danz A M, Zittermann A, Schiedermaier U, Klein K, Hotzel D, Schonau E. The effect of a specific strength-development exercise on bone mineral density in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.  J Women Health. 1998;  7 701-709
  • 6 Fujimura R, Ashizawa N, Watanabe M, Mukai N, Amagai H, Fukubayashi T, Hayashi K, Tokuyama K, Suzuki M. Effect of resistance exercise training on bone formation and resorption in young male subjects assessed by biomarkers of bone metabolism.  J Bone Min Res. 1997;  12 656-662
  • 7 Honda A, Naota S, Nagasawa S, Shimizu T, Umemura Y. High-impact exercise strengthens bone in osteogenic ovariectomized rats with the same outcome as Sham rats.  J Appl Physiol. 2003;  95 1032-1037
  • 8 Hornberger T A, Farrar R P. Physiological hypertrophy of the FHL muscle following 8 weeks progressive resistance exercise in the rat.  Can J Appl Physiol. 2004;  29 16-31
  • 9 Huang T H, Lin S C, Chang F L, Hsieh S S, Liu S H, Yang R S. Effects of different exercise modes on mineralization, structure, and biochemical properties in growing bone.  J Appl Physiol. 2003;  95 300-307
  • 10 Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A L, Randall R J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.  J Biol Chem. 1951;  193 265-275
  • 11 Menkes A, Mazel S, Redmond R A, Koffler K, Libanati C R, Gundberg C M, Zizic T M, Hagberg J M, Pratley R E, Hurley B F. Strength training increases regional bone mineral density and bone remodeling in middle-aged and older men.  J Appl Physiol. 1993;  74 2478-2484
  • 12 Morris F L, Naughton G A, Gibbs J L, Carlson J S, Wark J D. Prospective ten-month exercise intervention in premenarcheal girls: positive effects on bone and lean mass.  J Bone Min Res. 1997;  12 1453-1462
  • 13 Notomi T, Lee S J, Okimoto N, Okazaki Y, Takamoto T, Nakamura T, Suzuki M. Effects of resistance exercise training on mass, strength, and turnover of bone in growing rats.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;  82 268-274
  • 14 Notomi T, Okazaki Y, Okimoto N, Saitoh S, Nakamura T, Suzuki M. A comparison of resistance and aerobic training for mass, strength and turnover of bone in growing rats.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;  83 469-474
  • 15 Notomi T, Okimoto N, Okazaki Y, Tanaka Y, Nakamura T, Suzuki M. Effects of tower climbing exercise on bone mass, strength, and turnover in growing rats.  J Bone Min Res. 2001;  16 166-174
  • 16 Pruitt L A, Taaffe D R, Marcus R. Effects of a one-year high-intensity versus low-intensity resistance training program on bone mineral density in older women.  J Bone Min Res. 1995;  10 1788-1795
  • 17 Robling A G, Burr D B, Turner C H. Recovery periods restore mechanosensitivity to dynamically loaded bone.  J Exp Biol. 2001;  204 3389-3399
  • 18 Robling A G, Hinant F M, Burr D B, Turner C H. Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts.  J Bone Min Res. 2002;  17 1545-1554
  • 19 Shibata Y, Ohsawa I, Watanabe T, Miura T, Sato Y. Effects of physical training on bone mineral density and bone metabolism.  J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2003;  22 203-208
  • 20 Smith M Z, Goettsch B M, O'Brien J A, Van Ramshorst R D, Jaque S V, Sumida K D. Resistance training and bone mineral density during growth.  Int J Sports Med. 2008;  29 316-321
  • 21 Stanek K A, Davis M H, Coleman T G. Residual effects of ether anesthesia on whole-body hemodynamics and organ blood flows in the rat.  J Pharmacol Methods. 1988;  20 95-102
  • 22 Tsuzuku S, Shimokata H, Ikegami Y, Yabe K, Wasnich R D. Effects of high versus low-intensity resistance training on bone mineral density in young males.  Calcif Tissue Int. 2001;  68 342-347
  • 23 Turner C H. Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli.  Bone. 1998;  23 399-407
  • 24 Turner C H, Ichiro O, Takano Y. Mechanotransduction in bone: role of strain rate.  Am J Physiol. 1995;  269 E438-E442
  • 25 Turner C H, Robling A G. Designing exercise regimens to increase bone strength.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2003;  31 45-50
  • 26 Umemura Y, Sogo N, Honda A. Effects of intervals between jumps or bouts on osteogenic response to loading.  J Appl Physiol. 2002;  93 1345-1348
  • 27 Vincent K R, Braith R W. Resistance exercise and bone turnover in elderly men and women.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;  34 17-23
  • 28 Westerlind K C, Fluckley J D, Gordon S E, Kraemer W J, Farrell P A, Turner R T. Effect of resistance exercise training on cortical and cancellous bone in mature male rats.  J Appl Physiol. 1998;  84 459-464
  • 29 Yeh J K, Lui C C, Aloia J F. Effects of exercise and immobilization on bone formation and resorption in young rats.  Am J Physiol. 1993;  264 E182-E189

Dr. PhD Ken D. Sumida

Department of Biological Sciences
Chapman University

One University Drive

Orange, CA 92866

United States

Phone: + 1 71 49 97 69 95

Fax: + 1 71 45 32 60 48

Email: sumida@chapman.edu

    >