Int J Sports Med 2024; 45(02): 104-109
DOI: 10.1055/a-2155-6813
Training & Testing

Running Functional Threshold versus Critical Power: Same Concept but Different Values

Alberto A Ñancupil-Andrade
1   Department of Health, Universidad de Los Lagos, Puerto Montt, Chile
,
2   Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
,
Alejandro Pérez-Castilla
3   Department of Education, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
,
4   Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
,
Felipe García-Pinillos
5   Physical Education, Sports and Recreation, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
› Author Affiliations
Funding Information Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación — http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003033; PID2020–115600RB-C21 Ministerio de Universidades — http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100023561; FPU19/00542

Abstract

The aims of this study were (i) to estimate the functional threshold power (FTP) and critical power (CP) from single shorter time trials (TTs) (i. e. 10, 20 and 30 minutes) and (ii) to assess their location in the power-duration curve. Fifteen highly trained athletes randomly performed ten TTs (i. e. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, 30, 50 and 60 minutes). FTP was determined as the mean power output developed in the 60-min TT, while CP was estimated in the running power meter platform according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The linear regression analysis revealed an acceptable FTP estimate for the 10, 20 and 30-min TTs (SEE≤12.27 W) corresponding to a correction factor of 85, 90 and 95%, respectively. An acceptable CP estimate was only observed for the 20-min TT (SEE=6.67 W) corresponding to a correction factor of 95%. The CP was located at the 30-min power output (1.0 [–5.1 to 7.1] W), which was over FTP (14 [7.0 to 21] W). Therefore, athletes and practitioners concerned with determining FTP and CP through a feasible testing protocol are encouraged to perform a 20-min TT and apply a correction factor of 90 and 95%, respectively.



Publication History

Received: 24 May 2023

Accepted: 13 August 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 August 2023

Article published online:
06 October 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 García-Pinillos F, Latorre-Román PÁ, Roche-Seruendo LE. et al. Prediction of power output at different running velocities through the two-point method with the Stryd power meter. Gait Posture 2019; 68: 238-243
  • 2 Imbach F, Candau R, Chailan R. et al. Validity of the stryd power meter in measuring running parameters at submaximal speeds. Sports (Basel) 2020; 8: 103
  • 3 Cerezuela-Espejo V, Hernández-Belmonte A, Courel-Ibáñez J. et al. Are we ready to measure running power? Repeatability and concurrent validity of five commercial technologies. Eur J Sport Sci 2021; 21: 341-350
  • 4 Taboga P, Giovanelli N, Spinazzè E. et al. Running power: Lab based vs. portable devices measurements and its relationship with aerobic power. Eur J Sport Sci 2022; 22: 1555-1568
  • 5 Ruiz-Alias SA, Olaya-Cuartero J, Ñancupil-Andrade AA. et al. 9/3-minute running critical power test: Mechanical threshold location with respect to ventilatory thresholds and maximum oxygen uptake. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 1: 1-8
  • 6 Allen H, Coggan AR, McGregor S. Training and Racing with a Power Meter. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO. VeloPress; 2015: 326
  • 7 Borszcz FK, Tramontin AF, Costa VP. Is the functional threshold power interchangeable with the maximal lactate steady state in trained cyclists?. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2019; 14: 1029-1035
  • 8 Jeffries O, Simmons R, Patterson SD. et al. Functional threshold power is not equivalent to lactate parameters in trained cyclists. J Strength Cond Res 2021; 35: 2790-2794
  • 9 Lillo-Bevia JR, Courel-Ibanez J, Cerezuela-Espejo V. et al. Is the functional threshold power a valid metric to estimate the maximal lactate steady state in cyclists?. J Strength Cond Res 2022; 36: 167-173
  • 10 Karsten B, Petrigna L, Klose A. et al. Relationship between the critical power test and a 20-min functional threshold power test in cycling. Front Physiol 2021; 11: 1877
  • 11 Borszcz FK, Tramontin AF, Bossi AH. et al. Functional threshold power in cyclists: validity of the concept and physiological responses. Int J Sports Med 2018; 39: 737-742
  • 12 Cartón-Llorente A, García-Pinillos F, Royo-Borruel J. et al. Estimating functional threshold power in endurance running from shorter time trials using a 6-axis inertial measurement sensor. Sensors (Basel) 2021; 21: 582
  • 13 Jones AM, Vanhatalo A. The ‘Critical Power’ Concept: Applications to Sports Performance with a Focus on Intermittent High-Intensity Exercise. Sport Med 2017; 47: 65-78
  • 14 Hill DW. The critical power concept. A review. Sports Med 1993; 16: 237-254
  • 15 Billat V, Binsse V, Petit B. et al. High level runners are able to maintain a VO2 steady-state below VO2max in an all-out run over their critical velocity. Arch Physiol Biochem 1998; 106: 38-45
  • 16 Pepper ML, Housh TJ, Johnson GO. The accuracy of the critical velocity test for predicting time to exhaustion during treadmill running. 1992; 13: 121-124
  • 17 Ruiz-Alias SA, Ñancupil-Andrade AA, Pérez-Castilla A. et al. Critical power in endurance runners: A comparison of the estimated parameters reported by different theoretical models. Int J Sport Med. 2023
  • 18 McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES. et al. Defining training and performance caliber: A participant classification framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 17: 317-331
  • 19 Dearing CG, Paton CD. Is Stryd critical power a meaningful parameter for runners?. Biol Sport 2022; 40: 657-664
  • 20 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM. et al. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-12
  • 21 Zinoubi B, Vandewalle H, Driss T. Modeling of running performances in humans: Comparison of power laws and critical speed. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 1859-1867
  • 22 Muniz-Pumares D, Karsten B, Triska C. et al. Methodological approaches and related challenges associated with the determination of critical power and curvature constant. J Strength Cond Res 2019; 33: 584-596
  • 23 Jones AM, Burnley M, Black MI. et al. The maximal metabolic steady state: redefining the ‘gold standard. Physiol Rep 2019; 7: e14098
  • 24 Mattioni Maturana F, Keir DA, McLay KM. et al. Can measures of critical power precisely estimate the maximal metabolic steady-state? 2016; 41: 1197-1203
  • 25 Jones AM, Vanhatalo A, Burnley M. et al. Critical power: Implications for determination of V˙O2max and exercise tolerance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42: 1876-1890