Solid-State Silver-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Fluorination of Cyclobutanols by Using Mechanochemistry

Abstract

In this report, we demonstrate that a ball-milling technique facilitates fast and efficient silver-catalyzed ring-opening fluorination of cyclobutanols. This is the first report of a catalytic C–C bond-cleavage/functionalization reaction under solid-state mechanochemical conditions. The developed protocol affords a high yield of γ-fluorinated ketones within much shorter reaction times, and requires less silver catalyst and Selectfluor compared with the previous solution-based conditions. Notably, the process can be carried out in air. Because of the reduced use of chemicals and the simple time-saving experimental procedures, this technique is an efficient and environmentally friendly way to access γ-fluorinated ketones.

Key words

C–C bond cleavage - fluorination - mechanochemistry - ball-milling - solid-state chemistry - silver catalysis

In recent years, solvent-free solid-state organic transformations using ball-milling, known as mechanochemical reactions, have been extensively studied as new tools for organic chemistry.[1] [2] Compared with conventional solution-based reactions, the advantages of these mechanochemical conditions include the avoidance of potentially harmful organic solvents, shorter reaction times, simple experimental operations, and the possibility of different reactivities from those in solution.[3] Owing to these advantages, a number of organic transformations have been attempted under mechanochemical conditions. Although the benefits of mechanochemistry for solid-state reactions of compounds with reactive bonds, such as organic halides, have been well demonstrated, nonactivated bond cleavage through mechanochemical transformation remains unexplored. Catalytic C–C bond-cleavage/functionalization reactions have great synthetic utility in the preparation of complex valuable molecules and have been well demonstrated under solution-based conditions, but these types of reactions under mechanochemical conditions have not been studied.

Scheme 1 Silver-catalyzed ring-opening fluorination of cyclic alcohols

Fluorine-containing hydrocarbon motifs are often found in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and materials.[4] [5] Therefore, efficient methods to construct C(sp³)–F bonds have been extensively researched over recent decades.[6] Ring-opening fluorination of cyclic compounds has attracted attention as a valuable method for remote C(sp³)–F bond formation.[7] [8] In pioneering studies in 2015, the groups of Murakami,[8b] Zhu,[8c] and Loh and Feng[8d] independently reported silver-catalyzed ring-opening fluorinations of cyclic alcohols (Scheme [1]A). Although these C–C bond cleavage/fluorination reactions can provide efficient ways to synthesize γ-fluorinated ketones, the solution-based conditions require high catalyst loadings (>10 mol%), long reaction times, excessive amounts of Selectfluor, an inert-gas atmosphere, and toxic organic solvents. These requirements greatly reduce the practical utility of the ring-opening fluorination of cyclic alcohols. As part of our ongoing studies on mechanochemical synthesis, we proposed the transformation of this important reaction into a mechanochemical process.

Here, we report a silver-catalyzed ring-opening fluorination reaction of cyclic alcohols under solid-state mechanochemical conditions (Scheme [1]B).[9] The reaction proceeded efficiently to produce the desired γ-fluorinated ketones with high yields in shorter reaction times and with smaller amounts of silver catalyst and Selectfluor than the established solution conditions. Notably, the entire newly developed solid-state protocol can be carried out under ambient conditions; i.e., the reactants, reagents, and catalysts can all be added to the milling jar in air. Thus, this operationally simple protocol provides a more convenient and sustainable alternative to conventional solution-based ring-opening fluorination. Importantly, this study is the first example of a catalytic C–C bond cleavage/functionalization reaction under mechanochemical conditions.

We began our study by exploring the milling conditions (milling jar, grinding ball, frequency, and internal temperature) of the solid-state ring-opening fluorination of 1-phenylcyclobutanol (1A) (Table [1]). Reactions were conducted by using a Retsch MM400 mill equipped with a temperature-controllable heat gun [see the Supporting Information (SI) for details].[2f] Using the solution-based conditions discovered by the Murakami group[8b] for guidance, we carried the mechanochemical reaction of 1A in the presence of 20 mol% AgF catalyst and 4.0 equivalents of Selectfluor, with H₂O (0.20 μL of liquid per mg of solid reactant) as a liquid assistant for the grinding process[10] in a stainless-steel jar (5 mL) with one 10 mm diameter stainless-steel grinding ball at 25 Hz for 30 min. The internal temperature was 110 °C, as determined by thermography (preset temperature: 200 °C). Under these conditions, the desired γ-fluorinated ketone 2A was obtained in only 5% yield (Table [1], entry 1). Although a small amount of 2A was generated, the mechanochemical reaction under these preliminary conditions resulted in a complex mixture and a poor mass balance. We hypothesized that the high-temperature mechanochemical conditions were too harsh due to the higher concentrations than those present in solution reactions. To make the reaction conditions milder, we next examined the reaction at a lower internal temperature. As expected, the yield of 2A improved to 43% when the reaction was conducted at 55 °C (preset temperature: 80 °C) (entry 2). Lowering the frequency from 25 to 15 Hz gave a slightly better 46% yield of 2A (entry 3). A shorter reaction time (10 min) at 30 Hz provided a poor result (10% yield; entry 4). These results suggest that the reaction temperature is the principal factor affecting the efficiency of this mechanochemical ring-opening fluorination reaction. In all cases, undesired decomposition of 1A occurred during the reaction, and insoluble and unidentified compounds were found in the crude mixture. When the reaction was performed at room temperature, it was still incomplete after 30 min; a low yield of 2A was obtained (7%), and 49% of 1A was recovered (entry 5). Because decomposition of 1A was still observed even under the milder conditions, we hypothesized that metallic residues from the stainless-steel milling jar or ball might interfere with the substrate, the silver catalyst, or ­Selectfluor, leading to undesired side reactions.[11] [12] To confirm this, AgF was excluded from the mixture (Table [1], entry 6). Surprisingly, the ring-opening fluorination reaction still proceeded and gave 2A in 28% yield, with 30% conversion of 1A into unidentified byproducts. This result suggested that the stainless-steel milling jar and ball caused the side reactions. Other types of jars and balls made of other materials were therefore examined. We found that a ZrO₂ jar (10 mL) and ball (10 mm) resulted in a cleaner reaction mixture and produced 2A in 52% yield (entry 7). A jar and ball made of Teflon, which has a low density, permitted gentle mixing and gave 2A in a good yield of 51% (entry 8). On using a tungsten carbide jar (10 mL) and ball (10 mm), the yield of 2A decreased significantly to 16% (entry 9). Based on these results, the optimal milling conditions were a 10 mL ZrO₂ jar with a 10 mm ZrO₂ ball at 15 Hz at 55 °C (Table [1], entry 7).

Table 1 Optimization of the Milling Conditions^a

Entry	Jar/ball material	Frequency (Hz)	Internal temp (°C)	Yieldb (%)
1	stainless-steel	25	110	5
2	stainless-steel	25	55	43
3	stainless-steel	15	55	46
4c	stainless-steel	30	55	10
5	stainless-steel	15	35	7
6d	stainless-steel	15	55	28
7	ZrO2	15	55	52
8	Teflon	15	55	51
9	tungsten carbide	15	55	16

^a Conditions: 1A (0.30 mmol), AgF (20 mol%), Selectfluor (4.0 equiv), H₂O (0.20 μL/mg), milling jar, milling ball.

^b Determined by ¹H NMR analysis with CH₂Br₂ as an internal standard.

^c Reaction time 10 min.

^d Reaction conducted without AgF.

Further optimization of the conditions was subsequently carried out using the ZrO₂ milling jar and ball (Table [2]). After extensive experimentation, the standard conditions were defined as follows: AgF (5.0 mol%) and Selectfluor (1.0 equiv) with a small volume of H₂O (0.20 μL/mg) under the optimal milling conditions for 30 min. By using these conditions, 1A was converted into 2A in 68% yield (Table [2], entry 1). At a higher catalyst loading, 1A was entirely consumed, but the yield of 2A decreased (entry 2). This result suggested that a higher silver catalyst loading increases the concentration of reactive radical species and causes undesired side reactions. A lower catalyst loading (2.5 mol%) and a shorter reaction time (15 min) gave nearly identical results to the standard conditions (entry 3). Other metal additives, such as manganese or iron salts, known to be effective catalysts under solution conditions, were not suitable for this solid-state reaction (entries 4 and 5).[8d] [h] When AgF was excluded from the standard conditions, the reaction did not proceed (entry 6).

Table 2 Catalyst Optimization Using a ZrO₂ Milling Jar and Ball^a

Entry	Deviation from the standard conditions	Yieldb (%)
1	none	68
2	20 mol% AgF	55
3	2.5 mol% AgF, 15 min	70
4	20 mol% Mn(OAc)2·4H2O	27
5	20 mol% Fe(acac)2	–
6	no AgF	–

^a Standard conditions: 1A (0.30 mmol), AgF (5.0 mol%), Selectfluor (1.0 equiv), H₂O (0.20 μL/mg), 55 °C (internal temp), 30 min, ZrO₂ ball-milling jar (10 mL) with a ZrO₂ ball (10 mm), ball-milling at 15 Hz.

^b Determined by ¹H NMR analysis with CH₂Br₂ as the internal standard.

Having determined the optimal conditions, we next examined the substrate scope (Scheme [2]). A simple phenyl-substituted cyclobutanol 1A reacted well and produced the corresponding fluoro ketone 2A in 68% yield. Sterically hindered 1-mesitylcyclobutanol (1B) produced the ring-opened compound 2B in 39% yield. Substrates with aromatic substituents bearing an electron-donating methoxy group readily underwent fluorination to give the γ-fluorinated acetophenones 2C and 2D in yields of 62 and 80%, respectively. The presence of phenoxy or trifluoromethyl substituents in the para-position in 2E and 2F, respectively, reduced the efficiency of the reaction. In these cases, even in the presence of 10 mol% AgF catalyst, the reaction required a longer time to produce the desired products in good yields (74 and 89%, respectively). Reactants with halo functionalities such as fluoro or chloro were suitable for use under these conditions (2G and 2H). The reaction also proceeded with alkyl-substituted cyclobutanols, producing the corresponding products 2I and 2J in yields of 50 and 44%, respectively. In the case of the naphthyl-substituted alcohol 1K, a ring-opening intramolecular cyclization reaction occurred instead of the fluorination reaction, giving ketone 3 in 41% yield.[13] When heteroaromatic compounds such as the pyridine derivative 1L or the thiophene derivative 1M were subjected to these reaction conditions, the starting materials decomposed into complex mixtures. Less-ring-strained 1-phenylcyclopentanol (1N) and 1-phenylcyclohexanol (1O) afforded the corresponding fluorinated ketones 2N and 2O in lower yields (10 and 12%, respectively), in contrast to the favorable results observed with these substrates under solution-based conditions.[8d] These low yields were primarily caused by an undesired dehydration or protonation reaction that gave the alkenes 4 and 6 and the simple ketone 5. In addition, high concentrations of the starting materials remained after the reactions of 1N and 1O.[14]

To demonstrate the practical utility of the solid-state ball-milling reaction, solution and neat-stirring reactions were performed in screw-capped tubes under conditions similar to the mechanochemical standard conditions (Table [3]). The solution reaction of 1A was conducted in the presence of AgF (5.0 mol%) and Selectfluor (1.0 equiv) in a 1:1 water/benzene biphasic system (2.0 mL) at 55 °C under ambient atmosphere with magnetic stirring at 500 rpm. This solvent system was used by the Murakami group in their work.[8b] Under these conditions, 2A was obtained in very low yields of 2% after 30 minutes and 6% after 12 hours. The neat-stirring reaction progressed with low efficiency to yield the desired fluorinated ketone 2A in 27% yield, suggesting that the strong mechanical agitation induced by ball milling is crucial for successful solid-state fluorination.

Table 3 Comparative Studies under Solution-State and Neat Conditions

	Ball-milling (15 Hz)	Solution-state (500 rpm)	Neat (500 rpm)
Yielda (%)	68 (30 min)	2 (30 min)	27 (30 min)
		6 (12 h)

^a Determined by ¹H NMR analysis with CH₂Br₂ as the internal standard.

Scheme 2 Substrate scope for the solid-state ring-opening fluorination. Reaction conditions: 1A (0.30 mmol), 5.0 mol% AgF, Selectfluor (1.0 equiv), H₂O (0.20 mL/mg), 55 °C (internal temperature), 30 min, ZrO₂ ball-milling jar (10 mL) with a ZrO₂ ball (10 mm), ball-milling (15 Hz). ^a 10 mol% AgF for 1 h. ^b Yields determined by ¹H NMR analysis with CH₂Br₂ as the internal standard.

To investigate the reaction mechanisms in the solid state, we performed radical-trapping experiments (see the SI for details). We found that the addition of TEMPO as a radical scavenger completely inhibited the desired ring-opening fluorination. This result was consistent with the previously reported solution-state reactions. We therefore assume that this solid-state reaction has a radical-type reaction mechanism, similar to that under solution-state conditions.

In summary, we have developed a method for a silver-catalyzed solid-state ring-opening fluorination of cyclobutanols under ball-milling conditions.[15] This is the first example of a catalytic C–C bond cleavage/functionalization reaction under solid-state mechanochemical conditions. The developed mechanochemical conditions do not require potentially harmful organic solvents, and they use less silver catalyst and Selectfluor than previously reported solution-state conditions. Notably, all synthetic operations can be carried out in air. Considering these practical utilities, the present solid-state ring-opening fluorination is an efficient and environmentally friendly strategy for accessing γ-fluorinated ketones. Further studies to expand the scope of cyclic alcohols and the development of unique C–C bond-cleavage reactions in the solid state are ongoing in our laboratory.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

We thank Mr. Yuma Shiratori for his help in crosschecking the experiments.

• References and Notes


For selected reviews on the use of ball-milling for organic synthesis, see:
• 1a James SL, Adams CJ, Bolm C, Braga D, Collier P, Friščić T, Grepioni F, Harris KD. M, Hyett G, Jones W, Krebs A, Mack J, Maini L, Orpen AG, Parkin IP, Shearouse WC, Steed JW, Waddell DC. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 413
• 1b Wang G.-W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013; 42: 7668
• 1c Do J.-L, Friščić T. ACS Cent. Sci. 2017; 3: 13
• 1d Hernández JG, Bolm C. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 4007
• 1e Métro T.-X, Martinez J, Lamaty F. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017; 5: 9599
• 1f Achar TK, Bose A, Mal P. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017; 13: 1907
• 1g Eguaogie O, Vyle JS, Conlon PF, Gîlea MA, Liang Y. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018; 14: 955
• 1h Howard JL, Cao Q, Browne DL. Chem. Sci. 2018; 9: 3080
• 1i Andersen J, Mack J. Green Chem. 2018; 20: 1435
• 1j Bolm C, Hernández JG. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 3285
• 1k Friščić T, Mottillo C, Titi HM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 1018
• 1l Kubota K, Ito H. Trends Chem. 2020; 2: 1066
• 1m Porcheddu A, Colacino E, De Luca L, Delogu F. ACS Catal. 2020; 10: 8344
• 1n Virieux D, Delogu F, Porcheddu A, García F, Colacino E. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 13885
• 1o Cuccu F, De Luca L, Delogu F, Colacino E, Solin N, Mocci R, Porcheddu A. ChemSusChem 2022; 15: e202200362
• 1p Shaw TE, Mathivathanan L, Jurca T. Organometallics 2019; 38: 4066
• 1q Hwang S, Grätz S, Borchardt L. Chem. Commun. 2022; 58: 1661

For selected examples of solid-state organic transformations using ball-milling from our group, see:
• 2a Kubota K, Pang Y, Miura A, Ito H. Science 2019; 366: 1500
• 2b Kubota K, Takahashi R, Ito H. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 5837
• 2c Kubota K, Seo T, Koide K, Hasegawa S, Ito H. Nat. Commun. 2019; 10: 111
• 2d Pang Y, Lee JW, Kubota K, Ito H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 22570
• 2e Seo T, Kubota K, Ito H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 9884
• 2f Seo T, Toyoshima T, Kubota K, Ito H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021; 143: 6165
• 2g Kubota K, Toyoshima N, Miura D, Jiang J, Maeda S, Jin M, Ito H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 16003
• 2h Takahashi R, Hu A, Gao P, Gao Y, Pang Y, Seo T, Maeda S, Jiang J, Takaya H, Kubota K, Ito H. Nat. Commun. 2021; 12: 6691
• 2i Kubota K, Kondo K, Seo T, Ito H. Synlett 2022; 33: 898
• 3a Colacino E, Isoni V, Crawford D, García F. Trends Chem. 2021; 3: 335
• 3b Ardila-Fierro KJ, Hernández JD. ChemSusChem 2021; 14: 2145
• 3c Fantozzi N, Volle J.-N, Porcheddu A, Virieux D, García F, Colacino E. ChemRxiv 2022; preprint DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-b370p.
• 4a Müller K, Faeh C, Diederich F. Science 2007; 317: 1881
• 4b Hagmann WK. J. Med. Chem. 2008; 51: 4359
• 4c Purser S, Moore PR, Swallow S, Gouverneur V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008; 37: 320
• 4d Beger R, Resnati G, Metrangolo P, Weber E, Hulliger J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011; 40: 3496
• 4e Cametti M, Crousse B, Metrangolo P, Milani R, Resnati G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 31
• 4f Jacobson O, Kiesewetter DO, Chen X. Bioconjugate Chem. 2015; 26: 1
• 4g Gills EP, Eastman KJ, Hill MD, Donnelly DJ, Meanwell NA. J. Med. Chem. 2015; 58: 8315
• 4h Yerien DE, Bonesi S, Postigo A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016; 14: 8398
• 4i Meanwell NA. J. Med. Chem. 2018; 61: 5822
• 4j Ogawa Y, Tokunaga E, Kobayashi O, Hirai K, Shibata N. iScience 2020; 23: 101467
• 4k Inoue M, Sumii Y, Shibata N. ACS Omega 2020; 5: 10633
• 5a Smart BE. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001; 109: 3
• 5b O’Hagan D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008; 37: 308
• 5c Han J, Kiss L, Haibo M, Remete AM, Ponikvar-Svet M, Sedgwick DM, Roman R, Fustero S, Moriwaki H, Soloshonok VA. Chem. Rev. 2021; 121: 4678

For selected reviews, see:
• 6a Lian T, Constanze NN, Ritter T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 8214
• 6b Brooks AF, Topczewski JJ, Ichiishi N, Sanford MS, Scott PJ. H. Chem. Sci. 2014; 5: 4545
• 6c Champagne PA, Desroches J, Hamel J.-D, Vandamme M, Paquin J.-F. Chem. Rev. 2015; 115: 9073
• 6d Zhu Y, Han J, Wang J, Shibata N, Sodeoka M, Soloshonok VA, Coelho JA. S, Toste FD. Chem. Rev. 2018; 118: 3887
• 6e Szpera R, Moseley DF. J, Smith LB, Sterling AJ, Gouverneur V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 14824
• 6f Bertrand X, Chabaud L, Paquin J.-F. Chem. Asian J. 2021; 16: 563
• 6g Suto A, Yamaguchi J. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2021; 79: 910

For selected reviews of the ring-opening functionalization of cyclic alcohols, see:
• 7a Nikolaev A, Orellana A. Synthesis 2016; 48: 1741
• 7b Murakami M, Ishida N. Chem. Lett. 2017; 46: 1692
• 7c Liu Y, Wang Q.-L, Chen Z, Zhou C.-S, Xiong B.-Q, Zhang P.-L, Yang C.-A, Zhou Q. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019; 15: 256
• 7d Wu X, Zhu C. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 9747
• 7e Tsui E, Wang H, Knowles RR. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 11124
• 7f Murakami M, Ishida N. Chem. Rev. 2021; 121: 264
• 7g McDonald TR, Mills LR, West MS, Rousseaux SA. L. Chem. Rev. 2021; 121: 3

For a review of ring-opening fluorination, see:
• 8a Remete AM, Kiss L. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 5574

For selected examples of the ring-opening fluorination, see:
• 8b Ishida N, Okuma S, Nakanishi Y, Murakami M. Chem. Lett. 2015; 44: 821
• 8c Zhao H, Fan X, Yu J, Zhu C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 3490
• 8d Ren S, Feng C, Loh T.-P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 5105
• 8e Bloom S, Bume DD, Pitts CR, Lectka T. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 8060
• 8f Deng Y, Kauser NI, Islam SM, Mohr JT. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 5872
• 8g Lu Y.-C, Jordan HM, West JG. Chem. Commun. 2021; 57: 1871
• 8h Lu Y.-C, West JG. ACS Catal. 2021; 11: 12721
• 8i Wu P, Ma S. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 2533
• 8j Pitts CR, Ling B, Snyder JA, Bragg AE, Lectka T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 6598
• 8k Banik SM, Mennie KM, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 9152
• 8l Ilchenko NO, Hedberg M, Szabó KJ. Chem. Sci. 2017; 8: 1056
• 8m Wang M.-M, Waser J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 16420
• 8n Pitts CR, Bloom MS, Bume DD, Zhang QA, Lectka T. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 5225
• 8o Dauncey EM, Morcillo SP, Douglas JJ, Sheikh NS, Leonori D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 744
• 8p Kim D, Lim HN. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 7465
• 8q Song JW, Lim HN. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 5394
• 8r Roque JB, Kuroda Y, Göttemann LT, Sarapong R. Science 2018; 361: 171
• 8s Komatsuda M, Suto A, Kondo HJr, Hiroyuki T, Kato K, Saito B, Yamaguchi J. Chem. Sci. 2022; 13: 665
• 8t Komatsuda M, Ohki H, Kondo HJr, Suto A, Yamaguchi J. Org. Lett. 2022; 24: 3270

For selected examples of solid-state C(sp³)–F bond construction, see:
• 9a Wang Y, Wang H, Jiang Y, Zhang C, Shao J, Xu D. Green Chem. 2017; 19: 1674
• 9b Howard JL, Sagatov Y, Repusseau L, Schotten C, Browne DL. Green Chem. 2017; 19: 2798
• 9c Howard JL, Sagatov Y, Browne DL. Tetrahedron 2018; 74: 3118
• 10a Bowmaker GA. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 334
• 10b Ying P, Yu J, Su W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2021; 363: 1246
• 11 Štefanić G, Krehula S, Štefanić I. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 9245

For selected examples of reactions in which a milling ball or jar works as a metal catalyst, see:
• 12a Hwang S, Grätz S, Borchardt L. Chem. Commun. 2022; 58: 1661
• 12b Fulmer DA, Shearouse WC, Medonza ST, Mack J. Green Chem. 2009; 11: 1821
• 12c Cook TL, Walker JA. Jr, Mack J. Green Chem. 2013; 15: 617
• 12d Yu J, Li Z, Jia K, Jiang Z, Liu M, Su W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013; 54: 2006
• 12e Sawama Y, Niikawa M, Yabe Y, Goto R, Kawajiri T, Marumoto T, Takahashi T, Itoh M, Kimura Y, Sasai Y, Yamauchi Y, Kondo S, Kuzuya M, Monguchi Y, Sajiki H. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2015; 3: 683
• 12f Sawama Y, Kawajiri T, Niikawa M, Goto R, Yabe Y, Takahashi T, Marumoto T, Itoh M, Kimura Y, Monguchi Y, Kondo S, Sajiki H. ChemSusChem 2015; 8: 3773
• 12g Haley RA, Zellner AR, Krause JA, Guan H, Mack J. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2016; 4: 2464
• 12h Sawama Y, Yasukawa N, Bau K, Goto R, Niikawa M, Monoguchi Y, Itoh M, Sajiki H. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 2892
• 12i Vogt CG, Grätz S, Lukin S, Halasz I, Etter M, Evans JD, Borchardt L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 18942
• 12j Pickhardt W, Beaković C, Mayer M, Wohlgemuth M, Kraus FJ. L, Etter M, Grätz S, Borchardt L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022; e202205003
• 13 For silver-catalyzed ring expansion of cyclic alcohols, see: Yu J, Zhao H, Liang S, Bao X, Zhu C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 7924
• 14 For dehydration reaction of tertiary cyclic alcohols using a copper catalyst and Selectfluor, see: Ren S, Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang H, Zhang W, Liu Y, Liu M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 5381
• 15 4-Fluoro-1-phenylbutan-1-one (2a); Typical Procedure Cyclobutanol 1A (44.3 mg, 0.30 mmol, 1.0 equiv), AgF (1.9 mg, 0.015 mmol, 5.0 mol%), and Selectfluor (107.2 mg, 0.30 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were placed in a ball-milling vessel (ZrO₂, 10 mL) loaded with one grinding ball (ZrO₂; diameter: 10 mm). H₂O (31 μL, 0.20 μL/mg) was added from a syringe. The vessel was then closed in air without purging with an inert gas, and placed in the ball mill (Retsch MM400) for 30 min at 15 Hz with heating by a heat gun to an internal temperature of 55 °C. After 30 min, H₂O and Et₂O were added and the mixture was extracted with Et₂O (×3). The combined organic layer was dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc, 50:1] to give a colorless oil; yield: 33.8 mg (68%). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 2.16 (d quint, J = 27.6, 6.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.16 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2 H), 4.57 (dt, J = 48.8, 6.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.48 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.58 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (101 MHz CDCl₃): δ = 24.8 (d, J _C–F = 20.2 Hz, CH₂), 33.9 (d, J _C–F = 4.8 Hz, CH₂), 83.3 (d, J _C–F = 165.9 Hz, CH₂), 127.9 (CH), 128.6 (CH), 133.1 (CH), 136.7 (C), 199.0 (C). ¹⁹F NMR (376 MHz CDCl₃): δ = –220.9 to –221.4 (m, 1 F). HRMS-EI: m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₀H₁₁FO: 166.07939; found: 166.07934. The NMR spectra agreed with those reported in the literature.^8h

Publication History

Received: 18 November 2022

Accepted after revision: 29 January 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
29 January 2023

Article published online:
03 May 2023