PDF herunterladen
Synlett 2010(20): 3078-3080  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1259056
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Total Synthesis of Achaetolide from d-Mannitol

K. Sripad Rao, Amit Kumar Chattapadhyay, Subhash Ghosh*
Organic Chemistry Division III, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500607, India
Fax: +91(40)27193108; e-Mail: subhash@iict.res.in;
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 4 October 2010
Publikationsdatum:
19. November 2010 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

A highly convergent stereoselective total synthesis of achaetolide, a ten-membered lactone is described. The ring-closing metathesis reaction was used to construct the macrocycle and E-olefinic moiety in the molecule. The key acid and alcohol fragments were synthesized from a single chiral pool material d-mannitol.

Key words

Achaetominum cristalliferum - Ophiobolus sp. - achaetolide - d-mannitol - ring-closing metathesis

    References and Notes

  • 1 For a review on synthetic, biosynthetic, and pharmaco-logical aspects of decanolides, see: Dräger G. Kirschning A. Thiericke R. Zerlin M. Nat. Prod. Rep.  1996,  13:  365 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2a Bodo B. Molho L. Davoust D. Molho D. Phytochemistry  1983,  22:  447 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Tayone WC. Shindo S. Murakami T. Hashimoto M. Tanaka K. Takada N. Tetrahedron  2009,  65:  7464 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Fuchser J. Zeeck A. Liebigs Ann./Recl.  1997,  87 
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Ratnayake AS. Yoshida WY. Mooberry SL. Hemscheidt T. Org. Lett.  2001,  3:  3479 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5a Arnone A. Assante G. Montorsi M. Nasini G. Ragg E. Gazz. Chim. Ital.  1993,  123:  71 
    Google Scholar
  • 5b García-Fortanet J. Murga J. Falomir E. Carda M. Marco A. J. Org. Chem.  2005,  70:  9822 
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Otani I. Kusumi T. Kashman Y. Kakisawa H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1991,  113:  4092 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7a Chandrasekhar S. Balaji SV. Rajesh G. Tetrahedron Lett.  2010,  51:  5164 
    Google Scholar
  • 7b Das T. Rajib B. Samik N. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2010,  21:  2206 
    Google Scholar
  • 7c Srihari P. Kumaraswamy B. Sankar P. Ravishashidhar V. Yadav JS. Tetrahedron Lett.  2010,  51:  6174 
    Google Scholar
  • 8a Ghosh S. Rao RV. Shashidhar J. Tetrahedron Lett.  2005,  46:  5479 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Ghosh S. Rao RV. Tetrahedron Lett.  2007,  48:  6937 
    Google Scholar
  • 9a Mulzer J. Angermann A. Münch W. Liebigs Ann. Chem.  1986,  825 
    Google Scholar
  • 9b Chattopadhyay A. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  6104 
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Alcarez L. Hamett JJ. Mioskowski C. Martel JP. Le Gall T. Shin D.-S. Falck RJ. Tetrahedron Lett.  1994,  35:  5449 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dale JA. Mosher SH. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1973,  95:  512 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Garegg PG. Samuelson B. Synthesis  1979,  813 
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 13a Dess DB. Martin JC. J. Org. Chem.  1983,  48:  4155 
    Google Scholar
  • 13b Balkrishna SB. Childers WB. Pinnick HW. Tetrahedron  1981,  37:  2091 
    Google Scholar
  • 14a

    Analytical data for 5: [α]²5 D -30.3 (c = 0.82, CHCl3). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.24-7.30 (m, 4 H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.84-6.90 (m, 4 H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.73-5.86 (m, 2 H), 5.23-5.36 (m, 5 H), 4.59 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.49 (d, J = 10.95 Hz, 1 H), 4.47 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.25-4.37 (m, 4 H), 3.82 (m, 1 H), 3.81 (s, 3 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 3.48 (m, 1 H), 2.67 (dd, J = 15.3, 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.48 (dd, J = 15.3, 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.65-1.74 (m, 3 H), 1.45-1.56 (m, 2 H), 1.21-1.30 (br s, 9 H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 170.6, 159.2, 159.1, 137.5, 135.8, 130.9, 130.7, 130.4, 130.0, 129.3, 118.9, 118.1, 113.7, 81.1, 78.0, 77.5, 76.9, 72.9, 71.6, 70.2, 70.1, 55.3, 41.3, 35.9, 35.2, 31.8, 29.6, 29.2, 25.2, 22.7, 14.1. IR: 2926, 2858, 1730, 1512, 1246, 1034 cm-¹. MS (ESI): m/z = 711 [M + Na]+. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C42H56O8Na: 711.3872; found: 711.3884.

  • 14b

    Analytical data of achaetolide (1): mp 122-124 ˚C; [α]²5 D -22 (c = 0.1, MeOH); {lit.²a [α]²5 D -27 (c = 0.52, MeOH)}. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.02 (ddd, J = 15.8, 3.02, 2.26 Hz, 1 H), 5.68 (dd, J = 15.8, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.82 (q, J = 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.75 (m, 1 H), 4.57 (m, 1 H), 3.77 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.62 (dd, J = 12.1, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.57 (dd, J = 12.1, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.34 (ddd, J = 15.1, 10.5, 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.17 (br s, 2 H, OH), 2.03 (br s, 1 H, OH), 1.53-1.68 (m, 2 H), 1.48 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.21-1.31 (m, 10 H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 171.0, 130.8, 125.1, 75.3, 73.2, 67.1, 43.8, 36.9, 36.8, 31.7, 29.6, 29.3, 29.1, 24.9, 22.6, 14.0. IR: 2923, 2854, 1739, 1709, 1647, 1513, 1372, 1171 cm-¹. MS (ESI): m/z = 323 [M + Na]+.

  • 15a Mitsunobu O. Synthesis  1981,  1 
    Google Scholar
  • 15b Martin SF. Dodge JA. Tetrahedron Lett.  1991,  32:  3017 
    Google Scholar
  • 16a Gradillas A. Pérez-Castells J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2006,  45:  6086 
    Google Scholar
  • 16b Deiters A. Martin SF. Chem. Rev.  2004,  104:  2199 
    Google Scholar
  • 16c Love JA. In Handbook of Metathesis   Grubbs RH. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2003.  p.296-322  
    Google Scholar
  • 16d Grubbs RH. Tetrahedron  2004,  60:  7117 
    Google Scholar
  • 16e Trnka TM. Grubbs RH. Acc. Chem. Res.  2001,  34:  18 
    Google Scholar
  • 16f Fürstner A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2000,  39:  3012 
    Google Scholar
  • 17a Mohapatra DK. Ramesh KD. Giardello MA. Chorghade MS. Gurjar MK. Grubbs RH. Tetrahedron Lett.  2007,  48:  2621 
    Google Scholar
  • 17b Giri AG. Mondal MA. Puranik VG. Ramana CV. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2010,  8:  398 
    Google Scholar