Synlett 2023; 34(12): 1507-1511
DOI: 10.1055/a-1995-5960
cluster
Special Issue Honoring Masahiro Murakami’s Contributions to Science

Rh(II)-Catalyzed Ring Expansion of Cyclopropyl N-Tosylhydrazones to 1-Substituted Cyclobutenes

Wenbai Ouyang
a   Beijing National Laboratory of Molecular Sciences (BNLMS) and Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. of China
,
Jingfeng Huo
a   Beijing National Laboratory of Molecular Sciences (BNLMS) and Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. of China
,
Jianbo Wang
a   Beijing National Laboratory of Molecular Sciences (BNLMS) and Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. of China
b   The State Key Laboratory of Organometallic Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, P. R. of China
› Author Affiliations
The project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21871010), Laboratory for Synthetic Chemistry and Chemical Biology of Health@InnoHK of Innovation and Technology Commission (ITC), HKSAR.


We dedicate this paper to Prof. Masahiro Murakami for his outstanding contribution to organic chemistry.

Abstract

Cyclobutenes are highly useful synthetic intermediates as well as important motifs in functional molecules. Herein, we report a straightforward access toward monosubstituted cyclobutenes from cyclopropyl N-tosylhydrazone. 1,2-Aryl or -alkyl shift of the Rh(II) carbene intermediate plays the key role in this transformation.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 30 October 2022

Accepted after revision: 09 December 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
09 December 2022

Article published online:
03 January 2023

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Lee-Ruff E, Mladenova G. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 1449
    • 1b Gauvry N, Lescop C, Huet F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 5207
    • 1c Dembitsky VM. J. Nat. Med. 2008; 62: 1
    • 1d Grongsaard P, Bulger PG, Wallace DJ, Tan L, Chen Q, Dolman SJ, Nyrop J, Hoerrner RS, Weisel M, Arredondo J, Itoh T, Xie C, Wen X, Zhao D, Muzzio DJ, Bassan EM, Shultz CS. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012; 16: 1069
    • 1e Lukin K, Kishore V, Gordon T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2013; 17: 666
    • 1f Hancock EN, Wiest JM, Brown MK. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2019; 36: 1383
    • 1g Li J, Gao K, Bian M, Ding H. Org. Chem. Front. 2020; 7: 136

      For recent reviews, see:
    • 2a Murakami M, Ishida N. Chem. Rev. 2021; 121: 264
    • 2b Biletskyi B, Colonna P, Masson K, Parrain J.-L, Commeiras L, Chouraqui G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021; 50: 7513

      For recent examples, see:
    • 3a Simlandy AK, Lyu M.-Y, Brown MK. ACS Catal. 2021; 11: 12815
    • 3b Nvoa L, Trulli L, Parra A, Tortosa M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021; 60: 11763
    • 3c Goetzke FW, Hell AM. L, van Dijk L, Fletcher SP. Nat. Chem. 2021; 13: 880
    • 4a Ito H, Hasegawa M, Takenaka Y, Kobayashi T, Iguchi K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 4520
    • 4b Fürstner A, Davies PW, Gress T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 8244
    • 4c Liu YH, Liu MN, Song ZQ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 3662
    • 4d López-Carrillo V, Echavarren AM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 9292
    • 4e Schotes C, Mezzetti A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 3072
    • 4f Nishimura A, Ohashi M, Ogoshi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 15692
    • 4g Maturi MM, Bach T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 7661
    • 4h Poplata S, Tröster A, Zou Y, Bach T. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 9748
    • 4i García-Morales C, Ranieri B, Escofet I, López-Suarez L, Obradors C, Konovalov AI, Echavarren AM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 13628
    • 4j Parsutkar MM, Pagar VV, RajanBabu TV. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 15367
    • 5a Barluenga J, Riesgo L, López LA, Rubio E, Tomás M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 7569
    • 5b Barluenga J, Riesgo L, Lonzi G, Tomás M, López LA. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 9221
  • 6 Deng Y, Massey LA, Zavalij PY, Doyle MP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 7479
  • 7 Xu Y, Wang Z, Sun JT. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 7613
  • 8 Ning XQ, Chen YK, Hu FD, Xia Y. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 8348
    • 9a Friedman L, Shechter H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960; 82: 1002
    • 9b Sohn MB, Jones MJr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972; 94: 8280
    • 9c Gallucci RR, Jones MJr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976; 98: 7704
    • 9d Celebi S, Leyva S, Modarelli DA, Platz MS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993; 115: 8613
    • 9e Trost BM, Tanoury GJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 1636
    • 9f Moss RA, Zheng FM, Krogh-Jespersen K. Org. Lett. 2001; 3: 1439
    • 9g Nieto-Oberhuber C, Lopez S, Echavarren AM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 6178
    • 10a Shi M, Liu LP, Tang J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 7430
    • 10b Tian GQ, Yuan ZL, Zhu ZB, Shi M. Chem. Commun. 2008; 2668
    • 10c Fang W, Tang X.-Y, Shi M. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 40474
  • 11 Fürstner A, Aissa C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 6306
    • 12a Xu H, Zhang W, Shu D, Werness JB, Tang W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 8933
    • 12b Li C.-W, Pati K, Lin G.-Y, Abu Sohel SM, Hung H.-H, Liu R.-S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 9891
    • 12c Liu R, Zhang M, Wyche TP, Winston-McPherson GN, Bugni TS, Tang W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 7503
    • 13a Chuprakov S, Kwok SW, Zhang L, Lercher L, Fokin VV. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 18034
    • 13b Alford JS, Spangler JE, Davies HM. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 11712
    • 13c Zibinsky M, Fokin VV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 1507
    • 13d Chuprakov S, Worrell BT, Selander N, Sit RK, Fokin VV. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 195
    • 13e Liu RH, Zhang M, Winston-McPherson G, Tang WP. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 4376
  • 14 Patel SC, Smith MW. Mercer J. A. M, Suzuki K, Burns NZ. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 6530
    • 15a Barluenga J, Moriel P, Valdés C, Aznar F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 5587
    • 15b Barluenga J, Valdés C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 7486
  • 17 Feng J, Szeimies G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 2942
  • 18 Hilf S, Kilbinger AF. M. Nat. Chem. 2009; 1: 537
  • 19 All the reactions of rhodium-catalyzed ring expansion of cyclopropanes to cyclobutenes were performed under nitrogen atmosphere in a flame-dried reaction tube. All solvents were distilled under nitrogen atmosphere prior to use. Toluene, dioxane, and THF were dried over Na with benzophenone-ketyl intermediate as indicator, DCE and MeCN were dried over CaH2. 1H NMR (400 MHz) and 13C NMR spectra (100 MHz) were recorded with Bruker ARX 400 spectrometer. 19F NMR spectra were recorded with Bruker ARX 500 (160 MHz). The data for NMR spectra were reported as following: chemical shifts (δ) were reported in ppm using tetramethylsilane as internal standard when using CDCl3 as solvent, and coupling constants (J) are in Hertz (Hz). Infrared spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Avatar 330 Fourier transform spectrometer (FT-IR) and are reported in terms of frequency of absorption (cm–1). HRMS were obtained with Bruker APEX IV FTMS. All the cyclopropanes N-tosylhydrazones were prepared according to the literature procedures.15a,20,21 Rh2(OAc)4 was purchased from Adamas and used directly without further purification. Other starting materials were obtained from commercial suppliers and were used without further purification. Typical Procedure for Rh(II)-Catalyzed Ring Expansion of N-Tosylhydrazones to Cyclobutenes Under a nitrogen atmosphere, Rh2(OAc)4 (2.2 mg, 0.005 mmol, 2.5 mol%), N-tosylhydrazones 1aab (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv) and NaOt-Bu (38.4 mg, 0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were successively added to a flame-dried 10 mL Schlenk reaction tube. The reaction flask was degassed three times with nitrogen, and dry DCE (0.5 mL) was added using a syringe. The resulting solution was then stirred at the 70 °C for 20 h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered through a short plug of silica gel with Et2O as eluent. The solvent was removed with rotary evaporator under reduced pressure to leave a crude mixture. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel using pentane/Et2O mixtures as eluent to afford the corresponding in analytically pure form product 2aab. Procedure for Scale-up Synthesis of 2a Under a nitrogen atmosphere, Rh2(OAc)4 (44 mg, 0.10 mmol, 2.5 mol), N-tosylhydrazones 1a (1.56 g, 4.0 mmol, 1 equiv), and NaOt-Bu (0.786 g, 8.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv) were successively added to a flame-dried 25 mL Schlenk reaction tube. The reaction flask was degassed three times with nitrogen, and dry DCE (8 mL) was added using a syringe. The resulting solution was then stirred at the 70 °C for 20 h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered through a short plug of silica gel with Et2O as eluent. The solvent was removed with rotary evaporator under reduced pressure to leave a crude mixture. which was purified by silica gel column chromatography (PE–Et2O = 100:1) to afford pure product 2a (0.695 g, 84% yield). Hydroboration–Oxidation of 2a Under a nitrogen atmosphere, 1 M solution of borane–THF complex in THF (0.9 mL, 0.9 mmol, 4.5 equiv) was added to 2a (41.2 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h. 3 M aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (0.2 mL, 0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv) and 30% (w/w) aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide (0.6 mL, 4 mmol, 20 equiv) were added dropwise to the reaction at 0 °C, and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir for another 3 h. The aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O, the combined organic phases were washed with water and brine, and then dried over Na2SO4. After evaporation of the solvent, the remaining material was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (PE–EtOAc = 4:1) to give alcohol 3a as a white solid (24 mg, 53% yield). Hydrogenation of 2a Compound 2a (41.2 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in EOAc (2 mL) in a 10 mL reaction flask, and Pd/C (5%; 11 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) was added to the flask. The mixture was degassed by ‘pump-freeze-thaw’ cycles (3×) and flushed with H2 (1 atm). Then the reaction system was stirred at room temperature, under 1 atm of H2 atmosphere for 24 h, and the reaction was monitored by TLC. After the crude material reaction is complete, the resulting mixture was filtered through a short column of silica gel and washed with EtOAc. The solution was then concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (PE–Et2O = 100:1) to give 4a as a white solid (39.4 mg, 95% yield). Olefin Metathesis of 2a (a) Under nitrogen atmosphere, compound 2a (20.6 mg, 0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and a solution of precatalyst (H2IMes)(PCy3)2Cl2Ru=CHPh (2.1 mg, 0.01 mmol, 10 mol%) in toluene (1 mL) was added to a flame-dried 10 mL Schlenk reaction tube. After complete mixing of the solution, the styrene (110 μL, 1 mmol, 10 equiv) was added to the solution. The resulting solution was then stirred at the 80 oC for 12 h. The resulting mixture was filtered through a short column of silica gel and washed with EtOAc. The solution was then concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (PE–EtOAc = 100:1) to give 5a as a white solid (19.7 mg, 64% yield, Z/E = 1:4.1). (b) Under a nitrogen atmosphere, compound 2a (20.6 mg, 0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and a solution of precatalyst (H2IMes)(PCy3)2Cl2Ru=CHPh (2.1 mg, 0.01 mmol, 10 mol%) in toluene (1 mL) was added to a flame-dried 10 mL Schlenk reaction tube. After complete mixing of the solution, the ethyl vinyl ether (100 μL, 1 mmol, 10 equiv) was added to the solution. The resulting solution was then stirred at 80 °C for 12 h. The resulting mixture was filtered through a short column of silica gel and washed with EtOAc. The solution was then concentrated in vacuo and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (PE–EtOAc = 100:1) to give 5b as a white solid (24.5 mg, 88% yield, Z/E = 1:1).
  • 20 He T, Wang G, Bonetti V, Klare HF. T, Oestreich M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 12186
  • 21 Iuchi Y, Obora Y, Ishii Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 2536