TY - JOUR AU - Gunduz, Ahmet; Tekin, Mehmet; Konca, Capan; Turgut, Mehmet TI - Effectiveness of Laboratory Markers in Determining Serious Bacterial Infection in Children with Fever without Source SN - 1305-7707 SN - 1305-7693 PY - 2018 JO - J Pediatr Infect Dis JF - Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases LA - EN VL - 13 IS - 04 SP - 287 EP - 292 ET - 2018/10/15 DA - 2018/11/05 KW - fever without source KW - serious bacterial infection KW - childhood AB - We assessed the effectiveness of laboratory markers in determining the presence of serious bacterial infection (SBI) in well-appearing children aged 3 months to 17 years with fever without source (FWS). One hundred eighteen patients aged between 3 months and 17 years presenting to the pediatric department due to fever and with no focus of fever determined through history and physical examination were included in this prospective study. SBI was determined in 14 (11.9%) of the 118 patients. No significant difference was determined between the two groups in terms of age, sex, degree of fever, duration of fever, and mean platelet volume. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) were identified as independent predictive markers in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. PCT above 0.58 ng/mL emerged as the most sensitive and specific test at receiver operating curve analysis (sensitivity: 92.8%, specificity: 90.3%, area under the curve: 0.908, and p < 0.001). The method with the highest positive predictive value, 69.2, was a laboratory score consisting of CRP, PCT, and complete urine analysis ≥3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.6–90.7), while the marker with the highest negative predictive value, 98.9, was PCT > 0.58 ng/mL (95% CI:94.3–99.8). The NLR, CRP, and PCT were independent predictive markers in determining the presence of SBI in well-appearing children with FWS. PCT was the marker with the highest sensitivity and specificity in determining presence of SBI. The method with the highest positive predictive value was laboratory score, while PCT was the marker with the best negative predictive value. PB - Georg Thieme Verlag KG DO - 10.1055/s-0038-1673666 UR - http://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0038-1673666 ER -