Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28(01): 9-18
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-13-12-0147
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Erosion of the medial compartment of the canine elbow: occurrence, diagnosis and currently available treatment options

E. Coppieters
1   Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging and Small Animal Orthopaedics, Ghent University, Belgium
,
I. Gielen
1   Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging and Small Animal Orthopaedics, Ghent University, Belgium
,
G. Verhoeven
1   Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging and Small Animal Orthopaedics, Ghent University, Belgium
,
D. Van Vynckt
1   Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging and Small Animal Orthopaedics, Ghent University, Belgium
,
B. Van Ryssen
1   Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging and Small Animal Orthopaedics, Ghent University, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received:10 December 2013

Accepted:23 October 2014

Publication Date:
26 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Erosion of the medial compartment of the elbow joint refers to full thickness cartilage loss with exposure of the subchondral bone (modified Outerbridge grades 4–5) of the medial part of the humeral condyle (MHC) and the corresponding ulnar contact area. This finding may appear in the absence of an osteochondral fragment or a cartilage flap, or in combination with fragmentation of the medial coronoid process (MCP) or osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the MHC. With regard to the prognosis, it is important to diagnose these severe erosions. Imaging of cartilage lesions by means of radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is challenging in dogs. In contrast, direct arthroscopic inspection provides detailed information about the cartilage.

The treatment of these severe erosions is difficult because of the limited regenerative capacity of cartilage and presumed mechanical or physical triggering factors. Several conservative and surgical treatment methods have been proposed to treat elbows with severe cartilage defects. However, due to irreversible loss of cartilage, the prognosis in these cases remains guarded.

 
  • References

  • 1 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H. Arthroscopic findings in 100 dogs with elbow lameness. Vet Rec 1997; 140: 360-362.
  • 2 Morgan J, Wind A, Davidson A. Bone dysplasias in the Labrador Retriever: a radiographic study. J Am Hosp Assoc 1999; 35: 332-340.
  • 3 Fitzpatrick N, Smith T, Evans R. et al. Radiographic and arthroscopic findings in the elbow joints of 263 dogs with medial coronoid disease. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 213-223.
  • 4 Vermote K, Bergenhuyzen A, Gielen I. et al. Elbow lameness in dogs of six years and older: arthroscopic and imaging findings of medial coronoid disease in 51 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 43-50.
  • 5 Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R, Smith T. et al. Techniques of application and initial clinical experience with sliding humeral osteotomy for treatment of medial compartment disease of the canine elbow. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 261-278.
  • 6 Griffon D. Radio-ulnar incongruity in dogs with medial compartment disease. Proceedings of the 3rd World Veterinary Orthopaedic Congress. 2010. September 15-18 Bologna, Italy: p. 110-112.
  • 7 Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R. Working algorithm for treatment decision making for developmental disease of the medial compartment of the elbow in dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 285-300.
  • 8 Coppieters E, Samoy Y, Pey P. et al. Case report: Medial compartment disease in a young Large Münsterländer. Vlaams Diergeneesk Tijdschr 2012; 81: 88-92.
  • 9 Samoy Y, Gielen I, van Bree H. et al. Dysplastic elbow disease in dogs. Vlaams Diergeneesk Tijdschr 2011; 80: 327-338.
  • 10 van Bree H, Van Ryssen B. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy in osteochondrosis lesions. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1998; 28: 161-189.
  • 11 Meyer-Lindenberg A, Langhann A, Fehr M. et al. Arthrotomy versus arthroscopy in the treatment of the fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna (FCP) in 421 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 204-210.
  • 12 Moores A, Benigni L, Lamb C. Computed tomography versus arthroscopy for detection of canine elbow dysplasia lesions. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 390-398.
  • 13 Sun Y, Feng Y, Zhang C. et al. The regenerative effect of platelet-rich plasma on healing in large osteochondral defects. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 589-597.
  • 14 Gutbrod A, Guerrero T. Effect of external rotational humeral osteotomy on the contact mechanics of the canine elbow joint. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 845-852.
  • 15 Pfeil I, Böttcher P, Starke A. Proximal abduction ulna osteotomy (PAUL) for medial compartment diseases in dogs with ED. Proceedings of the 16th European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress. 2012. September 12-15 Bologna, Italy: p. 314-318.
  • 16 Conzemius M. Nonconstrained elbow replacement in dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 279-284.
  • 17 Déjardin L, Guillou R. Total elbow replacement in dogs. In Tobias K, Johnston S. editors Veterinary Surgery Small Animal. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2012: 752-759.
  • 18 Griffon D. Surgical disease of the elbow. In Tobias K, Johnston S. editors Veterinary Surgery Small Animal. St. Louis: Elsevier-Saunders; 2012: 732-751.
  • 19 Todhunter R, Spencer A. Chapter 154: Osteoarthritis. In Slatter D. editor Textbook of Small animal Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 2009: 2208-2246.
  • 20 Grondalen J, Grondalen T. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs. V. A. pathoanatomical investigation. Nord Vet Med 1981; 33: 1-16.
  • 21 Olsson S. General and etiologic factors in canine osteochondrosis. Vet Q 1987; 9: 268-278.
  • 22 Read R, Armstrong S, Okefee J. et al. Fragmentation of the medial coronoid process of the ulna in dogs - a study of 109 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1990; 31: 330-334.
  • 23 Kirberger R, Fourie S. Elbow dyslasia in the dog: pathophysiology, diagnosis and control. J S Afr Vet Assoc 1998; 69: 43-54.
  • 24 Olsson S. The early diagnosis of fragmented coronoid process and osteochondritis dissecans of the canine elbow joint. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1983; 19: 616-626.
  • 25 Wind A. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog: Part I. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 711-724.
  • 26 Seghers H, De Bakker E, Van Vynckt D. et al. Lameness after arthroscopic treatment of FCP: diagnostic findings in 35 dogs. Proceedings of the 3rd World Veterinary Orthopaedic Congress. 2010. September 15-18 Bologna, Italy: 687-688.
  • 27 Perry K, Li L. A retrospective study of the short-term complication rate following 750 elective elbow arthroscopies. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27: 68-73.
  • 28 Goldhammer M, Smith S, Fitzpatrick N. et al. A comparison of radiographic, arthroscopic and histological measures of articular pathology in the canine elbow joint. Vet J 2010; 186: 96-103.
  • 29 Bobinac D, Spanjol J, Zoricic S. et al. Changes in articular cartilage and subchondral bone histomorphometry in osteoarthritic knee joint in humans. Bone 2003; 32: 284-290.
  • 30 Dennis R, Kirberger R, Barr F. et al. Handbook of Small Animal Radiology and Ultrasound. Techniques and Differential Diagnosis. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010: 1
  • 31 Cook C, Cook J. Diagnostic imaging of canine elbow dysplasia: a review. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 144-153.
  • 32 Knox W, Sehgal C, Wood A. Correlation of ultrasonographic observations with anatomic features and radiography of the elbow joint in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 721-726.
  • 33 Vandevelde B, Van Ryssen B, Saunders J. et al. Comparison of the ultrasonographic appearance of osteochondrosis in the canine shoulder with radiography, arthrography, and arthroscopy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47: 174-184.
  • 34 Carpenter L, Schwarz P, Lowry L. et al. Comparison of radiologic imaging techniques for diagnosis of fragmented coronoid process of the cubital joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 78-83.
  • 35 Waldt S, Bruegel M, Ganter K. et al. Comparison of multislice CT arthrography and MR arthrography for the detection of articular cartilage lesions of the elbow. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 784-791.
  • 36 Shahabpour M, Kichouh M, Laridon E. et al. The effectiveness of diagnostic imaging methods for the assessment of soft tissue and articular disorders of the shoulder and elbow. Europ J Radiol 2008; 65: 194-200.
  • 37 Samii V, Dyce J, Pozzi A. et al. Computed tomographic arthrography of the stifle for detection of cranial and caudal cruciate ligament and meniscal tears in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50: 144-150.
  • 38 Tivers M, Mahoney P, Corr S. Canine stifle positive contrast computed tomography arthrography for assessment of caudal horn meniscal injury: a cadaver study. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 269-277.
  • 39 Tivers M, Mahoney P, Baines E. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of positive contrast computed tomography for the detection of injuries to the medial meniscus in dogs with naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50: 324-332.
  • 40 Baeumlin Y, De Rycke L, Van Caelenberg A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine elbow: an anatomic study. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 566-573.
  • 41 Janach K, Breit S, Kunzel W. Assessment of the geometry of the cubital (elbow) joint of dogs by use of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 211-218.
  • 42 Thiede R, Lu Y, Markel M. A review of the treatment methods for cartilage defects. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 263-272.
  • 43 Abatangelo G, Botti P, Del Bue M. et al. Intraarticular sodium hyaluronate injections in the Pond-Nuki experimental-model of osteo-arthritis in dogs 1. Biochemical results. Clin Orthop 1989; 241: 278-285.
  • 44 Ghosh P. The pathology of osteoarthritis and the rationale for the use of pentosan polysulfate for its treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1999; 28: 211-267.
  • 45 Sanderson R, Beata C, Flipo R-M. et al. Systematic review of the management of canine osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2009; 164: 418-424.
  • 46 Samoy Y, de Bakker E, Van Vynckt D. et al. Arthroscopic treatment of fragmented coronoid process with severe elbow incongruity. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 27-33.
  • 47 Hunziker E. Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cart 2001; 10: 432-463.
  • 48 Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R, Smith T. Early clinical experience with osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the medial humeral condyle in dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 246-260.
  • 49 Matsiko A, Levingstone T, O’Brien F. Advanced strategies for articular cartilage defect repair. Materials 2013; 6: 637-668.
  • 50 Fitzpatrick N. Algorithm of treatment for severe elbow dysplasia. Proceedings of the 16th European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress. 2012. September 12-15 Bologna, Italy: pg. 160-163.
  • 51 Wendelburg K, Beale B. Medium and long term evaluation of sliding humeral osteotomy in dogs. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 804-813.
  • 52 Preston C, Schulz K, Taylor K. In vitro experimental study of the effect of radial shortening and ulnar osteotomy on contact patterns in the elbow joint of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1548-1556.
  • 53 Kranz S, Lesser A. Radiographic evaluation of osteotomized ulnar segments following arthroscopic treatment for canine medial coronoid disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 383-388.
  • 54 Krotscheck U, Kalafut S, Meloni G. et al. Effect of ulnar ostectomy on intra-articular pressure mapping and contact mechanics of the congruent and incongruent canine elbow ex vivo. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 339-346.
  • 55 Olivieri M. Clinical experience about treatment of medial compartment disease with proximal ulnar osteotomy. Proceedings of the 3rd World Veterinary Congress. 2010. September 15-18 Bologna, Italy: 369.
  • 56 Cuddy L, Lewis D, Kim S. et al. Ex vivo contact mechanics and three-dimensional alignment of normal dogs after proximal ulnar rotational osteotomy. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 905-913.
  • 57 Burton N, Ellis J, Burton K. et al. An ex vivo investigation of the effect of the TATE canine elbow arthroplasty system on kinematics of the elbow. J Small Anim Pract 2013; 54: 240-247.
  • 58 Déjardin L. Total elbow replacement in dogs. Proceedings of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons Symposium, The Surgical Summit. 2012. November 1-3 National Harbor, USA: 705-709.
  • 59 Conzemius MG, Aper RL, Corti LB. Short-term outcome after total elbow arthroplasty in dogs with severe, naturally occurring osteoarthritis. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 545-552.
  • 60 Allen M. Advances in total joint replacement in small animals. J Small Anim Pract 2012; 53: 495-506.
  • 61 Franklin S, Schulz K, Karnes J. Theory and development of a unicompartmental resurfacing system for treatment of medial compartment disease of the canine elbow. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 765-773.
  • 62 Smith Z, Wendelburg K, Tepic S. In vitro biomechanical comparison of load to failure testing of a canine unconstrained medial compartment elbow arthroplasty system and normal canine thoracic limbs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 356-365.
  • 63 Dyce J. Arthrodesis in the dog. In practice 1996; 18: 267-279.
  • 64 Zamprogno H, Hash J, Hulse D. et al. Elbow denervation in dogs: Development of an in vivo surgical procedure and pilot testing. Vet J 2011; 190: 220-224.
  • 65 Tivers M, Upjohn M, House A. et al. Treatment of extrahepatic congenital portosystemic shunts in dogs - what is the evidence base?. J Small Anim Pract 2012; 53: 3-11.