Mechanical evaluation of a tapered thread-run-out half-pin designed for external skeletal fixation in small animals

Summary

An in vitro mechanical study was performed to compare the stiffness, maximum load, and cyclic load-to-failure of a new external fixation half-pin design utilizing a tapered thread-run-out (TRO) feature with currently available positive profile thread (PP) half-pins. Five different sizes of each of the two pin types were evaluated. Under static loading, TRO pins were significantly stiffer and had a higher maximum load compared to the similar sized PP pins (p ±0.0001 for all comparisons). In cyclic fatigue testing, TRO pins lasted 2.3- to 4.9-fold more cycles than PP pins of similar size (p ±0.0001 for all comparisons). The increased pin stiffness and improved cyclic lifespan provided by TRO pins may be especially valuable in the stabilization of biologically and mechanically challenging fracture cases where healing is prolonged.

Keywords

External skeletal fixation - half-pins - tapered thread-run-out - mechanical evaluation

• References

• 1 Johnson AL, Schaeffer DJ.. Evolution of the treatment of canine radial and tibial fractures with external fixators. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 256-261.
• 2 Anderson MA, Mann FA, Kinden DA. et al. Evaluation of cortical bone damage and axial holding power of nonthreaded and enhanced threaded pins place with and without drilling of a pilot hole in femurs from canine cadavers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 208: 883-887.
• 3 Anderson MA, Palmer RH, Aron DN.. Improving pins selection and insertion technique for external skeletal fixation. Compend Contin Educ 1997; 19: 485-494.
• 4 Aron DN, Toombs JP.. Updated principles of external skeletal fixation. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1984; 6: 845-858.
• 5 Aron DN, Toombs JP, Hollingsworth SC.. Primary treatment of severe fractures by external skeletal fixation: Threaded pins compared with smooth pins. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1985; 22: 659-670.
• 6 Bennett RA, Egger EL, Histand M. et al. Comparison of the strength and holding power of 4 pin designs for use with half pin (type I) external skeletal fixation. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 207-211.
• 7 Clary EM, Roe SC.. Enhancing external skeletal fixation pin performance: Consideration of the Pin-Bone Interface. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8: 1-8.
• 8 Clary EM, Roe SC.. In vitro biomechanical and histological assessment of pilot hole diameter for positive-profile external skeletal fixation pins in canine tibia. Vet Surg 1996; 25: 453-462.
• 9 Dernell WS, Harari J, Blackketter DM.. A comparison of acute pull-out strength between two-way and one-way transfixation pin insertion for external skeletal fixation in canine bone. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 110-114.
• 10 Dudley M, Johnson AL, Olmstead M. et al. Open reduction and bone plate stabilization, compared with closed reduction and external fixation for treatment of comminuted tibial fractures: 47 cases (1980–1995) in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 211: 1008-1012.
• 11 Egger EL, Rigg DL, Blass CE. et al. Type I biplanar configuration of external skeletal fixation: Application technique in nine dogs and one cat. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1885; 187: 262-267.
• 12 Egger EL.. Principles of external fixation application. Proceedings of the AAHA [American Animal Hospital Association] 55^th Annual Meeting; 1988 April 16–22; Washington DC. Denver (CO, USA): American Animal Hospital; 1988: pg. 189-194.
• 13 Folland ML, Egger EL.. Application of Type III external fixators: A review of 23 clinical fractures in 20 dogs and two cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 193-202.
• 14 Johnson AL, Seitz SE, Smith CW. et al. Closed reduction and type-II external fixation of comminuted fractures of the radius and tibia in dogs: 23 cases (1990–1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 209: 1445-1448.
• 15 McDonald DE, Palmer RH, Hulse DA. et al. Holding power of threaded external skeletal fixation pins in the near and far cortices of cadaveric canine tibiae. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 488-493.
• 16 Palmer RH, Aron DN.. Ellis pin complications in seven dogs. Vet Surg 1990; 19: 440-445.
• 17 Palmer RH, Hulse DA, Hyman WA. et al. Principles of bone healing and biomechanics of external skeletal fixation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 45-68.
• 18 Toombs JP.. Principles of external skeletal fixation using the Kirschner-Ehmer splint. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1991; 6: 68-74.
• 19 Kraus KH, Wotten HM, Rand WM.. Mechanical comparison of two external fixator clamp designs. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 224-230.
• 20 Kraus KH, Wotten HM, Boudrieau RJ. et al. Type-II external fixation, using new clamps and positive-profile threaded pins, for treatment of fractures of the radius and tibia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 8: 1267-1270.
• 21 Brinker WO, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW.. Stiffness studies on various configurations and types of external fixators. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 21: 801-808.
• 22 Halsey D, Fleming B, Pope MH. et al. External fixator pin design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 278: 305-312.
• 23 Pilkey WD, Pilkey DF.. Shoulder Fillets. In: Peter-son’s Stress Concentration Factors. 3rd Edition. Hoboken (NJ, USA): John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2008: 135-166.
• 24 Sandor BI. Fatigue - Damage Prediction and Indication. In: Fundamentals of Cyclic Stress and Strain. First Printing. Madison (WI, USA): The University of Wisconsin Press; 1972: pg. 144.
• 25 Ben-Amotz R, Liska WD, Beale BS. et. al. Ilio-femoral external fixator application for temporary stabilization of recurring caudal ventral hip joint luxation after total hip replacement. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 159-162.
• 26 Lauer S, Hosgood G, Ramirez S. et al. In vivo comparison of two hinged transarticular skeletal fixators for multiple ligamentous injuries of the canine stifle. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 25-35.