Changes to articular cartilage following remote application of radiofrequency energy and with or without Cosequin therapy

Summary

Objective: To determine the short- and long-term changes in the biomechanical properties and metabolic activity of articular cartilage following the remote application of bipolar radiofrequency (bRF) and monopolar radiofrequency (mRF) energy within the rabbit stifle joint.

Methods: The rabbits were randomly assigned to either Group-1 (normal rabbit food), or they were assigned to Group-2 (2% Cosequin^® in the diet). Each rabbit underwent bilateral stifle arthroscopy with either bRF or mRF applied to the infrapatellar fat pad for 45 seconds. Cartilage samples were collected at zero, four, and 14 weeks after surgery. Data were analyzed with a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) for chondrocyte death, amount of GAG synthesis, and the equilibrium compressive modulus.

Results: A significant increase in histological damage was noted at weeks four and 14 compared to week zero. Most of the chondrocyte death noted with confocal laser microscopy (49 of 56 samples) was noted in the superficial region (outer 25%) of the articular cartilage. GAG synthesis was not significantly different between groups or devices at any time point. A significant difference was not noted in equilibrium compressive modulus throughout the study.

Conclusions: Remote application of bRF and mRF energy lead to immediate chondrocyte death. Most of the damage was superficial hence the metabolic activity and biomechanical properties of the extra-cellular matrix were maintained throughout this study. Treatment with Cosequin did not prevent superficial chondrocyte death caused by the application of radio-frequency (RF) energy with in the joint.

Keywords

Radiofrequency - arthroscopy - articular cartilage - Cosequin^® - rabbits

• References

• 1 Kaplan L, Uribe JW, Sasken H. et al. The acute effects of radiofrequency energy in articular cartilage: an in vitro study. Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 2-5.
• 2 Lu Y, Edwards RB III, Cole BJ. et al. Thermal chondroplasty with radiofrequency energy. An in vitro comparison of bipolar and monopolar radio-frequency devices. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29: 42-49.
• 3 Lu Y, Hayashi K, Hecht P. et al. The effect of monopolar radiofrequency energy on partial-thickness defects of articular cartilage. Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 527-536.
• 4 Edwards RB III, Lu Y, Nho S. et al. Thermal chondroplasty of chondromalacic human cartilage: An ex vivo comparison of bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency devices. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30: 90-97.
• 5 Lu Y, Edwards RB III, Kalscheur VL. et al. Effect of bipolar radiofrequency energy on human articular cartilage. Comparison of confocal laser microscopy and light microscopy. Arthroscopy 2001; 17: 117-123.
• 6 Cook JL, Marberry KM, Kuroki K. et al. Assessment of cellular, biochemical, and histologic effects of bipolar radiofrequency treatment of canine articular cartilage. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 604-609.
• 7 Edwards RB III, Lu Y, Rodriquez E. et al. Thermo-metric determination of cartilage matrix temperatures during thermal chondroplasty: comparison of bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency devices. Arthroscopy 2002; 18: 339-346.
• 8 Turner As, Tippett JW, Powers BE. et al. Radiofrequency (electrosurgical) ablation of articular cartilage: a study in sheep. Arthroscopy 1998; 14: 585-591.
• 9 Uribe JW, Markarian G. et al. Use of coblation in articular cartilage surgery. Research Outcomes in Arthroscopic Surgery 1998; 3: 1-4.
• 10 Barber FA, Uribe JW, Weber SC. Current applications for arthroscopic thermal surgery. Arthroscopy 2002; 18: 40-50.
• 11 Gundel J, Saskin H, Popvitz L. et al. The effect of bipolar radiofrequency energy on partial-thickness chondral defects in a sheep model. 20^thAnnual Meeting, Arthroscopy Association of North America 2001
• 12 Ryan A, Bertone A, Kaeding CC. et al. The effects of radiofrequency energy treatment on chondrocytes and matrix of fibrillated articular cartilage. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31: 386-391.
• 13 Owens BD, Stickles BJ, Balikian P. et al. Prospective analysis of radiofrequency versus mechanical debridement of isolated patellar chondral lesions. Arthroscopy 2002; 18: 151-155.
• 14 Basleer C. Stimulation of proteoglycan production by glucosamine sulfate in chondrocytes isolated from human osteoarthritic articular cartilage in vitro. Osteoarth Cartil 1998; 6: 427-434.
• 15 Ronca F, Palmieri L, Panicucci P. et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of chondroitin sulfate. Oseoarth Cartil 1998; 6 (Suppl A) 14-21.
• 16 Chan PS, Caron JP, Rosa GJM. Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate regulate gene expression and synthesis of nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 in articular cartilage explants. Osteoarth Cartil 2005; 13: 387-394.
• 17 Banks WJ. Applied Veterinary Histology, 3^rded. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1993: 68-76. 96-103.
• 18 Woodward JS, Lippiello L, Karpman RR. Beneficial effect of dietary chondroprotective agents in a rabbit instability model of osteoarthritis. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting 1999
• 19 Anderson MA, Lippiello L, Henderson T. Beneficial effect of cartilage structure-modifying agents in a rabbit instability model of osteoarthrosis. ACR 63^rdAnnual Scientific Meeting 1999. Boston: MA;
• 20 Anderson MA, Slater MR, Hammad TA. Results of a survey of small-animal practitioners on the perceived clinical efficacy and safety of an oral nutraceutical. Prevent Vet Med 1999; 38: 65-73.
• 21 Davidson G. Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2000; 22: 454-458.
• 22 Neil KM, Caron JP, Orth MW. The role of glucosa-mine and chondroitin sulfate in treatment for and prevention of osteoarthritis in animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 1079-1088.
• 23 Hulse DS, Hart D, Slatter M. et al. The effect of cosequin in cranial cruciate deficient and reconstructed stifle joints in dogs. 25^thAnnual Conference of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society 1998. Sun Valley: ID;
• 24 Canapp SO, McLaughlin RM, Hoskinson JJ. et al. Scintigraphic evaluation of dogs with acute synovitis after treatment with glucosamine hydro-chloride and chondroitin sulfate. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 1552-1557.
• 25 Elder SH, Kimura JH, Soslowsky LJ. et al. Effects of compressive loading on chondrocyte differentiation in agarose cultures of chick limb bud cells. J Orthop Res 2000; 18: 78-86.
• 26 Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW. et al. SAS® System for Mixed Models Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1996
• 27 Braitman LE. Confidence intervals assess both clinical significance and statistical significance. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 515-517.
• 28 Lu Y, Bogdanske J, Lopez M. et al. Effect of simulated shoulder thermal capsulorrhaphy using radiofrequency energy on glenohumeral fluid temperature. Arthroscopy 2005; 21: 592-596.
• 29 Obrzut SL, Hecht P, Hayashi K. et al. The effect of radiofrequency energy on the length and temperature properties of the glenohumeral joint capsule. Arthroscopy 1998; 14: 395-400.
• 30 Osmond C, Hecht P, Hayashi K. et al. Comparative effects of laser and radiofrequency energy on joint capsule. Clin Ortho Relat Res 2000; 375: 286-294.
• 31 Shellock FG, Shields CL. Temperature changes associated with radiofrequency energy-induced heating of bovine capsular tissue: Evaluation of bipolar RF electrodes. Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 348-358.
• 32 Naseef GS, Foster RE, Trauner K. et al. The thermal properties of bovine joint capsule: The basic science of laser- and radiofrequency-induced capsular shrinkage. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25: 670-674.
• 33 Lopez MJ, Hayashi K, Fanton GS. et al. The effect of radiofrequency energy on the ultrastructure of joint capsular collagen. Arthroscopy 1998; 14: 495-501.
• 34 Hecht P, Hayashi K, Cooley AJ. et al. The thermal effect of monopolar radiofrequency energy on the properties of joint capsule: An in vivo histologic study using a sheep model. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 808-814.
• 35 Hecht P, Hayashi K, Lu Y. et al. Monopolar radio-frequency energy effects on joint capsular tissue: potential treatment for joint instability: An in vivo mechanical, morphological, and biochemical study using and ovine model. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 761-771.
• 36 Lu Y, Hayashi K, Edwards RB III. et al. The effect of monopolar radiofrequency treatment pattern on joint capsular healing: In vitro and in vivo studies using and ovine model. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28: 711-719.
• 37 Lopez MJ, Hayashi K, Vanderby R. et al. Effects of monopolar radiofrequency energy on ovine joint capsular mechanical properties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 374: 286-297.
• 38 Nightingale E, Ball C, Cameron R. et al. Radiofrequency energy effects on the mechanical properties of tendon and capsule. 47^thAnnual Meeting, Ortohopaedic Research Society. 2001. San Francisco: CA;
• 39 Wallace AL, Hollinshead RM, Frank CB. Electrothermal shrinkage reduces laxity but alters creep behavior in a lapine ligament model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 1-6.
• 40 McFarland EG, Kim TK, Banchasuek P. et al. Histologic evaluation of the shoulder capsule in normal shoulder, unstable shoulders, and after failed thermal capsulorrhaphy. Am Ortho Soc Sports Med 2002; 30: 636-642.
• 41 Hayashi K, Markel MD. Thermal capsulorrhaphy treatment of shoulder instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 390: 59-72.
• 42 Medvecky MJ, Ong BC, Rokito AS. et al. Thermal capsular shrinkage: Basic science and clinical applications. Arthroscopy 2001; 17: 624-635.
• 43 Van Haesendonck C, Sinnaeve A, Willems R. et al. Biophysical and electrical aspects of radiofrequency catheter ablation. Acta Cardiol 1995; 50: 105-115.
• 44 Mainil-Varlet P, Monin D, Weiler C. et al. Quantification of laser-induced cartilage injury by confocal microscopy in an ex vivo model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 566-571.