Methods Inf Med 2010; 49(06): 592-598
DOI: 10.3414/ME09-01-0079
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Tortuosity in Movement Paths Is Related to Cognitive Impairment

Wireless Fractal Estimation in Assisted Living Facility Residents
W. D. Kearns
1   Department of Aging and Mental Health, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
,
V. O. Nams
2   Department of environmental Sciences, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada
,
J. L. Fozard
3   School of Aging Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 28 August 2009

accepted: 11 March 2009

Publication Date:
18 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Background: Using traditional assessment procedures, prior research demonstrated that deficiencies in gait and balance occur in the later stages of dementia.

Objective: We tested the hypothesis that an automated system capable of detecting path tortuosity (irregular movement) in elders would show that greater tortuosity was associated with greater cognitive impairment, potentially allowing early detection of dementia over time as tortuosity levels slowly increased.

Methods: An ultra-wideband sensor network using wireless transponders measured daytime locomotion to an accuracy of 20 cm in 14 elderly residents in an assisted living facility (ALF) as they traversed a shared living area while performing daily activities such as going to a dining area, conversing and watching television. Transponder location was updated at 0.4 sec intervals while in motion and revealed large individual differences in activity patterns.

Results: Fractal dimension (Fractal D), a measure of movement path tortuosity (directed vs. irregular or apparently aimless locomotion) was significantly and negatively correlated with cognitive status as measured by the Mini Mental State Examination administered to each participant at the study’s end.

Conclusions: Previous studies of locomotion in laboratory settings that have demonstrated gait variability increases with poor cognitive status have necessarily controlled various components of gait. The present results demonstrate that directional changes and other locomotion components can be studied by monitoring free movements in normal living settings over time. Implications for assessment and management of dementia-related wandering are discussed.

 
  • References

  • 1 Spirduso WW. Balance and posture. In: Spirduso W, Francis K, MacRae P editors. Physical dimensions of aging. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 2005
  • 2 Fozard JL. Sensory and Cognitive Changes with Age. In: Schaie KW. editor. Mobility and transportation in the elderly. New York: Springer; 2000. pp 1-44.
  • 3 Evans WJ. Effects of Exercise on Body Composition and Functional Capacity of the Elderly. In: Schaie KW. editor. Mobility and transportation in the elderly. New York: Springer; 2000. pp 71-90.
  • 4 Allali G, Kressig RW, Assal F, Herrmann FR, Dubost V, Beauchet O. Changes in gait while backward counting in demented older adults with frontal lobe dysfunction. Gait & Post 2007; 26: 572-576.
  • 5 Verghese J, Lipton RB, Hall CB, Kuslansky G, Katz MJ, Buschke H. Abnormality of gait as a predictor of non-Alzheimer’s dementia. NEJM 2002; 347: 1761-1768.
  • 6 Giladi N, Herman T, Reider-Groswasser II, Gurevich T, Hausdorff J. Clinical characteristics of elderly patients with a cautious gait of unknown origin. J Neurol 2005; 252: 300-306.
  • 7 Verghese J, Holtzer R, Lipton RB, Wang C. Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009; 64A (Suppl. 08) 896-901.
  • 8 Hausdorff J, Rios D, Edelberg H. Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: A 1-year prospective study. Arch Phys Med and Rehabil 2001; 82 (Suppl. 08) 1050-1056.
  • 9 Luis CA, Brown LM. Neuropsychological correlates of wanderers. In: Nelson AL, Algase DL. editors. Evidence-based protocols for managing wandering behaviors. New York: Springer; 2007. pp 65-74.
  • 10 Merory JR, Wittwer JE, Rowe CC, Webster KE. Quantitative gait analysis in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Gait & Post 2007; 26: 414-419.
  • 11 Algase D. Assessment of wandering behaviors. In: Nelson AL, Algase DL. editors. Evidence-based protocols for managing wandering behavior. New York: Springer; 2007. pp 75-120.
  • 12 Algase DL, Moore DH, Vandeweerd C, Gavin-Dreschnack DJ. Mapping the maze of terms and definitions in dementia-related wandering. Aging & Ment Hlth 2007; 11: 686-698.
  • 13 Johnson DK, Storandt M, Morris JC, Galvin JE. Longitudinal study of the transition from healthy aging to Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2009; 66 (10) 1254-1259.
  • 14 Ramakers Ihgb, Visser PJ, Aalten P, Boesten JHM, Metsemakers JFM, Jolles J. et al. Symptoms of pre-clinical dementia in general practice up to five years before dementia diagnosis. Demen and Ger Cog Disord 2007; 24: 300-306.
  • 15 Nelson AL, Algase DL. Appendix B, Measurement Tools for Wandering. Revised Algase Wandering Scale-Community Version. In: Nelson AL, Algase DLeditors. Evidence-based protocols for managing wandering behavior. New York: Springer; 2007. pp 385-397.
  • 16 Algase DL, Beattie ER, Leitsch SA, Beel-Bates CA. Biomechanical activity devices to index wandering behavior in dementia. Am J Alz Dis & Oth Demen 2003; 18: 85-92.
  • 17 Teicher M. Actigraphy and Motion Analysis: New Tools for Psychiatry. Harv Rev Psychiat 1995; 3: 18-35.
  • 18 Teicher M, McGreenery CE, Ohashi K. Actigraph assessment of rest activity disturbances in psychiatric disorders. Psychosomatic Medicine: Proceedings of the 18th World Congress on Psychosomatic Medicine, held in Kobe, Japan, August 21-26, 2005 1287 32-37
  • 19 Verghese J, Wang C, Lipton RB, Holtzer R, Xue X. Quantitative gait dysfunction and risk of cognitive decline and dementia. J Neurol, Neurosurg & Psych 2007; 78: 929-935.
  • 20 Kearns WD, Algase DL, Moore DH, Ahmed S. Ultra wideband radio: A novel method for measuring wandering in persons with dementia. Gerontech 2008; 7: 48-57.
  • 21 Hausdorff JM. Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: Finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking. Hum Mvt Sci 2007; 26: 555-589.
  • 22 Bascompte J, Vilà C. Fractals and search paths in mammals. Landscape Ecol 1997; 12: 213-221.
  • 23 Caldwell IR, Nams VO. A compass without a map: Tortuosity and orientation of eastern painted turtles (Chrysemys picta picta) released in unfamiliar territory. Can J Zool 2006; 84: 1129-1137.
  • 24 Doerr VAJ, Doerr ED. Fractal analysis can explain individual variation in dispersal search paths. Ecology 2004; 85: 1428-1438.
  • 25 Nams VO. Detecting oriented movement of animals. Anim Behav 2006; 72: 1197-1203.
  • 26 Desrochers A, Fortin MJ. Understanding avian responses to forest boundaries: a case study with chickadee winter flocks. Oikos 2000; 91: 376-384.
  • 27 Mårell A, Ball JP, Hofgaard A. Foraging and movement paths of female reindeer: Insights from fractal analysis, correlated random walks, and Lévy flights. Can J Zool 2002; 80: 854-865.
  • 28 Coughlin DJ, Strickler JR, Sanderson B. Swimming and search behaviour in clownfish, Amphiprion perideraion, larvae. Anim Behav 1992; 44: 427-440.
  • 29 Fourcassie V, Coughlin D, Traniello JFA. Fractal analysis of search behavior in ants. Naturwissenschaften 1992; 79: 87-89.
  • 30 Mandelbrot B. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science 1967; 156: 636-638.
  • 31 Nams VO. Using animal movement paths to measure response to spatial scale. Oecologia 2005; 143: 179-188.
  • 32 Nams VO, Bourgeois M. Fractal dimension measures habitat use at different spatial scales: an example with marten. Can J Zool 2004; 82: 1738-1747.
  • 33 Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA 1993; 269: 2386-2391.
  • 34 Algase D, Yao L, Beel-Bates C, Song J. Theoretical Models of Wandering. In: Nelson A, Algase DL. editors. Evidence-Based Protocols for Managing Wandering Behaviors. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2007
  • 35 Kearns WD, Algase D, Moore DH, Ahmed S. Ultra wideband radio: A novel method for measuring wandering in persons with dementia. Gerontech 2008; 7: 48-57.
  • 36 Nams VO. Improving accuracy and precision in estimating fractal dimension of animal movement paths. Acta Biotheoretica 2006; 54: 1-11.
  • 37 Maeker E, Bombois S, Pardessus V, Tiberghien F, Dipompeo C, Thevenon A. et al. Cognitive disorders and falls: experience of the Lille multidisciplinary falls service. Revue Neurologique 2005; 161: 419-426.
  • 38 Scazufca M, Almeida OP, Vallada HP, Tasse WA, Menezes PR. Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination for screening dementia in a community with low socioeconomic status: results from the Sao Paulo Ageing & Health Study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009; 259: 8-15.
  • 39 Sheridan PL, Hausdorff JM. The role of higher-level cognitive function in gait: executive dysfunction contributes to fall risk in Alzheimer’s disease. Dem & Ger Cog Dis 2007; 24: 125-137.
  • 40 Verghese J, Derby C, Katz MJ, Lipton RB. High risk neurological gait syndrome and vascular dementia. J Neur Trans 2007; 114: 1249-1252.
  • 41 Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D. et al. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008; 105 (49) 19052-19059.
  • 42 Pavel M, Hayes T, Tsay I, Erdogmus D, Paul A, Larimer N, Jimison H. Continuous assessment of gait velocity in Parkinson’s disease from unobtrusive measurements. Proceedings of the 3rd International IEEE Conference on Neural Engineering. CNE ’07. Kohala Coast, Hawaii, USA: 2007. pp 700-703.