Download PDF
J Pediatr Intensive Care 2012; 01(04): 183-192
DOI: 10.3233/PIC-12031
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart – New York

Acute rehabilitation in critically ill children

Karen Choong
a   Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
b   Department of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
c   Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
,
Nga Tran
a   Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
,
Heather Clark
a   Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
,
Cynthia Cupido
a   Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
b   Department of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
,
Daniel J. Corsi
d   Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

20 January 2012

15 August 2012

Publication Date:
28 July 2015 (online)

  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Immobility increases morbidity, while early mobilization improves outcomes in adults. Rehabilitation practices in critically ill children, and the degree to which they are immobilized, are currently not well understood. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate acute rehabilitation practices and potential barriers to mobilization in a tertiary care pediatric critical care unit (PCCU). Children aged less than 18 yr with a greater than 24 h length of stay were eligible. Outcomes of interest were physical therapy (PT) practice patterns, predictors of immobility, and adverse sequelae attributable to immobility. Interventions were classified as non-mobility and mobility types of PT. Ninety-one patients were included, 46.2% (42/91) were males. The mean age was 6.4 ± 6.4 yrs. Thirty-six of ninety-one (39.6%) patients received some form of PT while in PCCU. The mean proportion of PCCU days during which PT occurred was 20% (SD 28.8), and 3% (3/91) of patients received PT daily. Sixteen patients (17.6%) received exclusively non-mobility PT, 20 (22.0%) received some form of mobility, and six (6.6%) received both non-mobility and mobility PT. Increased severity of illness, mechanical ventilation, baseline disability and young age were identified barriers to mobilization. Immobilization is common in critically ill children. PT was often delayed until the patient was stabilized, and when performed was focused on respiratory function. Mobility PT was reserved for less sick, older, and non-mechanically ventilated patients. Future research is necessary to evaluate the significance of immobility and its impact on clinical outcomes in this population.

Keywords

Pediatric critical care - physical therapy - rehabilitation - mobilization