Retrograde placement of a novel 3.5 mm titanium interlocking nail for supracondylar and diaphyseal femoral fractures in cats

Summary

Twenty-four simple or comminuted supracondylar and diaphyseal femoral fractures in cats, which had been treated by retrograde insertion of a new 3.5 mm titanium interlocking nail (IN) from the intercondylar notch, were evaluated between June 2000 and October 2004 at the Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort. Patient data (species, breed, weight, and age), fracture characteristics, details of the surgery, post-operative complications and radiographic follow-up were recorded. The mean body weight was 3.75 kg and the cats ranged in age between four and 66 months (mean 29 months). The IN had a diameter of 3.5 mm and a length of 100, 109 or 119 mm, and were all fixed in a static position (two screws in seven cats, three screws in 10 cats and four screws in seven cats). Cerclage wires were used in seven cats and an autogenous bone graft was used in two cats. Screw or nail breakage were not recorded. Nineteen fractures healed without any complications, three cats died during the post-operative period from unknown causes, and two cats showed delayed bone healing. Twenty cats were considered to have an excellent limb function at one month. One cat with a sciatic injury was non-weight bearing for several months. Radiographic signs of degenerative joint disease of the stifle joint were not observed except in the cat with the sciatic nerve injury. The results of this study suggest that this new 3.5 mm titanium IN can be introduced from the intercondylar notch and be used in static fixation mode to stabilize supracondylar and diaphyseal femoral fractures in cats.

Keywords

Interlocking nail - supracondylar - femoral - intercondylar notch - titanium

• References

• 1 Simpson DJ, Lewis DD. Fracture of the femur. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter DH. (ed). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2003: 2059-2089.
• 2 Parker RB, Bloomberg MS. Modified intramedullary pin technique for repair of distal femoral phy- seal fractures in the dog and cat. J AmVet Med Ass 1984; 184: 1259-1265.
• 3 Dueland RT, Johnson KA, Roe SC. et al. Interlocking nail treatment of diaphyseal long-bone fractures in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214: 59-66.
• 4 Bernarde A, Diop A, Maurel N. et al. An In Vitro Biomechanical Study of Bone Plate and Interlocking Nail in a Canine Diaphyseal Femoral Fracture Model. JVet Surg 2001; 30: 397-408.
• 5 Duhautois B. Use of Veterinary Interlocking Nails for Diaphyseal Fracture in Dogs and Cats: 121 Cases. JVet Surg 2003; 32: 8-20.
• 6 Moses PA, Lewis DD, Lanz OI. et al. Intramedullary interlocking nail stabilization of 21 humeral fractures in 19 dogs and one cat. Aust Vet J 2002; 80: 336-343.
• 7 Dueland RT, Berglund L, Vanderby R. et al. Structural Properties of Interlocking Nails, Canine Femora, and Femur-Interlocking Nail Constructs. J VetSurg 1996; 25: 386-396.
• 8 Horstman CL, Beale BS, Conzemius MG. et al. Biological Osteosyntesis Versus Traditional Anatomic Reconstruction of 20 Long-Bone Fractures Using an Interlocking Nail: 1994-2001. JVetSurg 2004; 33: 232-237.
• 9 Endo K, Nakamura K, Maeda Hetal. Interlocking Intramedullary Nail Method for the Treatment of Femoral and Tibial Fractures in Cats and Small Dogs. JVet Med Sci 1998; 60: 119-122.
• 10 Wheeler JL, Stubbs WP, Lewis DD. et al. Intramedullary Interlocking Nail Fixation in Dogs and Cats: Biomechanics and Instrumentation. Com- pend Cont Ed 2004; 16: 519-544.
• 11 Larin A, Eich CS, Parker RB. et al. Repair of diaphyseal femoral fractures in cats using interlocking intramedullary nails: 12 cases (1996-2000). J Am VetMed Assoc 2001; 219: 1098-1104.
• 12 Whitehair Whitehair, Vasseur PB. Fractures of the femur. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 149-159.
• 13 Diaz-Bertrana MC, Durall I, Puchol JL. et al. Interlocking nail treatment of long-bone fractures in cats: 33 cases (1995-2004). Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 119-126.
• 14 Anup Anup, Mehra MM. Retrograde femoral interlocking nail in complex fractures. J Orthop Surg 2002; 10: 17-21.
• 15 Chang CK, Wu JS, Mao DL. et al. Mechanical and histological evaluation of hydroxyapatite - coated and noncoated Ti6Al4V implants in tibia bone. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 56: 17-23.
• 16 Debrauwer S, Hendrix K, Verdonk R. Anterograde femoral nailing with reamed interlocking titanium alloy nail. Acta Orthop Belg 2000; 66: 484-489.
• 17 Hollander DA, von Walter M, Wirtz T. et al. Structural, mechanical and in vitro characterization of indivudually structured Ti-6Al-4V produced by direct laser forming. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 955-963.
• 18 Muller M, Henning FF, Hothorn T. et al. Bone-implant interface shear modulus and ultimate stress in a transcortical rabbit model of open-pore Ti6Al4V implants. J Biomech 2006; 39: 2123-2132.
• 19 Millis Millis, Jackson AM. Delayed Unions Nonunions and Malunions. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter DH. (ed). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2003: 1849-1861.
• 20 Muir Muir, Johnson KA. Interlocking intramedullary nail stabilization of a femoral fracture in a dog with osteomyelitis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996; 209: 1262-1264.
• 21 Janzing HM, Stockman B, Van Damme G. et al. The retrograde intramedullary supracondylar nail: an alternative in the treatement of distal femoral fractures in the elderly. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 118: 92-95.
• 22 Durall I, Diaz-Bertana MC, Puchol JL. et al. Radiographic findings related to interlocking nailing: windshield-wiper effect, and locking screw failure. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 217-222.
• 23 Durall Durall, Diaz MC. Early experience with the use of an interlocking nail for repair of canine femoral shaft fractures. JVet Surg 1996; 25: 397-406.
• 24 Reynders P, Schonken P, Hoogmartens M. Interlocking nail: a practical aiming device for distal screw insertion. Acta Orthop Belg 1990; 56: 605-608.