The effect of measurement method on static weight distribution to all legs in dogs using the Quadruped Biofeedback System

Summary

An application to measure static quadruped load distribution would be highly beneficial in the assessment of rehabilitation and lameness in many small animal patients. The scope of this study was to analyze the effects of confinement, location and local environment on the measurement of static quadruped load distribution as measured by the Quadruped Biofeedback System in normal dogs in order to better prescribe the use of this system. A prospective study of 20 healthy adult dogs was performed to evaluate effects on measurement on quadruped load distribution. Data collection in the form of mean load per extremity was recorded four times in five positions for a total of 20 measurements for each limb. A replicated cross-over design in which a mixed effect, repeated measures analysis of variance was used to test for main effects of treatment and end as well as their interaction. The effects of right vs. left within each end and for each end was analyzed for each treatment and significance of p<0.01 was established. Measurements were taken from 20 healthy adult dogs with no obvious lameness at the time of data collection. Analysis by end suggests that measurements were affected in similar manners in comparable locations. Each method demonstrated consistency in measurement without any significant influence by day or session, suggesting that one standardized method be established for measurement. With standardization, the Quadruped Biofeedback System has potential use as a reliable instrument for the measurement of quadruped load distribution in dogs.

Keywords

Rehabilitation therapy - lameness - force plate analysis - Quadruped Biofeedback System

• References

• 1 Arnold Arnold, Millis DL. Physical Rehabilitation: Improving the Outcome in Dogs with Orthopedic Problems. Vet Med 2005; 100: 438-448.
• 2 Johnson JA, Austin C, Breur GJ. Incidence of canine appendicular musculoskeleatal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 through 1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 56-69.
• 3 Marsolais GS, McLean S, Derrick T. et al. Kinematic analysis of the hind limb during swimming and walking in healthy dogs and dogs with surgically corrected cranial cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 739-743.
• 4 Marsolais GS, Dvorak G, Conzemius MG. Effects of postoperative rehabilitation on limb function after cranial cruciate ligament repair in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 1325-1330.
• 5 Monk ML, Preston CA, McGowan CM. Effects of early intensive postoperative physiotherapy on limb function after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with deficiency ofthe cranial cruciate ligament. Am JVet Res 2006; 67: 529-536.
• 6 Johnson JM, Johnson AL, Pijanowski GJ. et al. Rehabilitation of dogs with surgically treated cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles by use of electrical stimulation of muscles. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 1473-1478.
• 7 Dunning D. Measuring the Success of Rehabilitation. Western Veterinary Conference. Las Vegas, NV: 2004
• 8 Evans R, Horstman C, Conzemius M. Accuracy and optimization of force platform gait analysis in Labradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated at a walking gait. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 445-449.
• 9 Rumph PF, Steiss JE, West MS. Interday variation in vertical ground reaction force in clinically normal Greyhounds at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 679-683.
• 10 Evans R, Gordon W, Conzemius M. Effect of velocity on ground reaction forces in dogs with lameness attributable to tearing of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am JVet Res 2003; 64: 1479-1481.
• 11 Bertram JE, Lee DV, Case HN. et al. Comparison of the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am JVet Res 2000; 61: 832-838.
• 12 DuLaney D, Purinton T, Dookwah H. et al. Effect of starting distance on vertical ground reaction forces in the normal dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 183-185.
• 13 Jevens DJ, Hauptman JG, DeCamp CE. et al. Contributions to variance in force-plate analysis of gait in dogs. Am JVet Res 1993; 54: 612-615.
• 14 Hicks DA, Millis DL, Arnold GA. et al. Comparison of Weightbearing at a Stance vs. Trotting in Dogs with Rear Limb Lameness. Proceedings 32nd Annual Conference of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. 2005