Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2012; 108(01): 101-106
DOI: 10.1160/TH12-02-0125
Platelets and Blood Cells
Schattauer GmbH

Biological efficacy of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Laurent Bonello
1   Département de Cardiologie, Hôpital Universitaire Nord, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
2   INSERM UMRS 608, Faculté de Pharmacie, Marseille, France
,
Julie Berbis
3   Faculté de Médecine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
4   Research Unit EA 3279 and Department of Public Health, Marseille, France
,
Marc Laine
1   Département de Cardiologie, Hôpital Universitaire Nord, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
,
Sébastien Armero
1   Département de Cardiologie, Hôpital Universitaire Nord, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
,
Jacques Bessereau
5   Pôle RUSH, Hôpital Timone, Marseille, France
,
Laurent Jacquin
5   Pôle RUSH, Hôpital Timone, Marseille, France
,
Caroline Bonello
6   Service de Santé Publique et Information Médicale, Hôpital Universitaire Nord, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille, France
,
Elise Camillieri
7   Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital de Martigues, Martigues, France
,
Paul Barragan
8   Service de Cardiologie, Clinique les Fleurs, Ollioules, France
,
Françoise Dignat-George
2   INSERM UMRS 608, Faculté de Pharmacie, Marseille, France
9   Laboratoire d’Hématologie, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France
,
Franck Paganelli
1   Département de Cardiologie, Hôpital Universitaire Nord, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
,
Laurence Camoin-Jau
9   Laboratoire d’Hématologie, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France
10   URMITE UMR 6236, CNRS-IRD, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Marseille, France
› Author Affiliations Financial support: The study was supported by an institutional grant from the Assistance publique-Hopitaux de Marseille.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 29 February 2012

Accepted after major revision: 29 March 2012

Publication Date:
22 November 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Optimal platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition is critical to prevent thrombotic events in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to determine the relationship between high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) following a 600 mg loading dose (LD) of clopidogrel. We performed a prospective monocentre study enrolling patients on clopidogrel undergoing PCI. The VASP index was used to assess PR inhibition after clopidogrel LD. HTPR was defined according to the consensus as a VASP index ≥50%. The present study included 833 patients undergoing PCI. Most patients had PCI for an acute coronary syndrome (58.7%). The mean VASP index was 50 ± 23% with a large inter-individual variability (range: 1–94%). Patients with a VASP index ≥50% were significantly older (p= 0.03), with a higher body mass index (BMI) (p<0.001), more often diabetic (p=0.03), taking omeprazole (p=0.03), admitted for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and with a high fibrinogen level compared to good responders (VASP <50%). In multivariate analysis BMI, omeprazole use, ACS and high fibrinogen level (p<0.001) remained significantly associated with HTPR. Of importance, in this analysis STEMI was independently associated with HTPR when compared with the other forms of ACS (NSTEMI and unstable angina) with an odd ratio of 2.14 (95% CI: 1.3 –3.5; p=0.003). In conclusion, STEMI is associated with high on-treatment platelet reactivity following 600 mg of clopidogrel. The present results suggest that 600 mg of clopidogrel may not be able to achieve an optimal PR inhibition in STEMI patients undergoing PCI and more potent drugs may be preferred.

Keywords

VASP index - percutaneous coronary intervention - high on-treatment platelet reactivity - acute coronary syndrome
 

  • References

  • 1 Schömig A, Neumann FJ, Kastrati A. et al. A randomized comparison of antipla-telet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1084-1089.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Frundi D. et al. Time dependence of platelet inhibition after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in a large, unselected cohort of candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2005; 111: 2560-2564.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bonello L, Tantry US, Marcucci R. et al. Waksman R, Gurbel PA. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 919-933.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Barragan P, Bouvier JL, Roquebert PO. et al. Resistance to thienopyridines: Clinical detection of coronary stent thrombosis by monitoring of vasodilator6stimu-lated phosphoprotein phosphorylation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 295-302.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bonello L, Paganelli F, Arpin-Bornet M. et al. Vasodilatorstimulated phosphopro-tein phosphorylation analysis prior to percutaneous coronary intervention for exclusion of postprocedural major adverse cardiovascular events. J Thromb Hae-most 2007; 05: 1630-1636.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bouman HJ, Parlak E, van Werkum J W. et al. Which platelet function test is suitable to monitor clopidogrel responsiveness? A pharmacokinetic analysis on the active metabolite of clopidogrel. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 08: 482-488.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gurbel PA, Becker RC, Mann KG. et al. Platelet function monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1822-1834.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sibbing D, von Beckerath O, Schömig A. et al. Platelet function in clopidogrel-treated patients with acute coronary syndrome. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2007; 18: 335-9. TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med. 2007 357. 2001-2015.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E. et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in pat ients undergoing percutaneou s coronary i nter vention for ST-elevati on myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 723-731.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A. et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 2909-2945.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bassand J P, Hamm CW, Ardissino D. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1598-1660.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Soffer D, Moussa I, Harjai KJ. et al. Impact of angina class on inhibition of platelet aggregation following clopidogrel loading in patients undergoing coronary intervention: do we need more aggressive dosing regimens in unstable angina?. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 21-25.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 2550-2583.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bonello L, Armero S, Ait Mokhtar O. et al. Clopidogrel loading dose adjustment according to platelet reactivity monitoring in patients carrying the 2C19*2 loss of function polymorphism. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 1630-1636.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bonello L, Camoin-Jau L, Armero S. et al. Tailored clopidogrel loading dose according to platelet reactivity monitoring to prevent acute and subacute stent thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 5-10.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wang XD, Zhang DF, Zhuang SW, Lai Y. Modifying clopidogrel maintenance doses according to vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index improves clinical outcome in patients with clopidogrel resistance. Clin Cardiol 2011; 34: 332-338.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Mallouk N, Labruyere C, Reny JL. et al. Prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel A systematic review. Thromb Haemost 2012; 107: 494-506.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Aradi D, Komócsi A, Vorobcsuk A. et al. Prognostic significance of high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity after percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2010; 160: 543-551.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sugidachi A, Ogawa T, Kurihara A. et al. The greater in vivo antiplatelet effects of prasugrel as compared to clopidogrel reflect more efficient generation of its active metabolite with similar antiplatelet activity to that of clopidogrel’s active metabolite. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05: 1545-1551.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Osmancik P, Jirmar R, Hulikova K. et al. A comparison of the VASP index b etween patients with hemodynamically complicated and uncomplicated acute myo-cardial infarction Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 75: 158-166.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Guthikonda S, Alviar CL, Vaduganathan M. et al. Role of reticulated platelets and platelet size heterogeneity on platelet activity after dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 743-749.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Heestermans AA, van Werkum JW, Taubert D. et al. Impaired bioavailability of clopidogrel in patients with a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Thromb Res 2008; 122: 776-781.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Angiolillo DJ, Fernández-Ortiz A, Bernardo E. et al. Platelet Aggregation According to Body Mass In dex in Patients Undergoing Corona r y Ste nting: Should Clopidogrel Loading-Dose Be Weight Adjusted?. J Invasive Cardiol 2004; 16: 169-174.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bonello-Palot N, Armero S, Paganelli F. et al. Relation of body mass index to high on-treatment platelet reactivity and of failed clopidogrel dose adjustment according to platelet reactivity monitoring in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 1511-1515.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gilard M, Arnaud B, Cornily JC. et al. Influence of omeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel associated with aspirin: the randomized, double-blind OCLA (Omeprazole CLopidogrel Aspirin) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 256-260.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Angiolillo DJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E. et al. Platelet function profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease on combined aspirin and clopidogrel treatment. Diabetes 2005; 54: 2430-2435.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ferroni P, Basili S, Falco A. et al. Platelet activation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 02: 1282-1291.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Erlinge D, Varenhorst C, Braun OO. et al. Patients with poor responsiveness to thienopyridine treatment or with diabetes have lower levels of circulating active metabolite, but their platelets respond normally to active metabolite added ex vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1968-1977.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gaborit B, Frère C, Cuisset T. et al. Enhanced post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in diabetic patients is independently related to plasma fibrinogen level but not to glycemic control. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 07: 1939-1941.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bernlochner I, Steinhubl S, Braun S. et al. Association between inflammatory biomarkers and platelet aggregation in patients under chronic clopidogrel treatment. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 1193-1200.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Vieira-de-Abreu A, Campbell RA, Weyrich AS. et al. Platelets: versatile effector cells in hemostasis, inflammation, and the immune continuum. Semin Immunopathol 2012; 34: 5-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pober JS, Sessa WC. Evolving functions of endothelial cells in inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 07: 803-815.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar