Semin Speech Lang 2008; 29(2): 083-091
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1080754
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Preschool Children: Intervention Goals and Use of Technology

Katherine C. Hustad1 , 2 , Kirsten Keppner1 , 2 , Amanda Schanz1 , 2 , Alycia Berg2
  • 1Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • 2Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 July 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

This study sought to describe speech-language interventions for preschool-aged children who required augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as provided by AAC experts and by general speech-language pathologists who were not AAC experts. The study also examined the types of technology used in AAC intervention by AAC experts. A retrospective chart review was conducted in which clinic records of 38 preschool-aged children who received expert AAC services were examined. Results showed that interventions provided to the children by general speech-language pathologists (who were not AAC experts) tended to be broader in scope, focusing on reducing underlying impairments. Interventions provided by AAC experts tended to focus on improving activities and participation and were oriented toward improving functional communication. The most commonly used AAC intervention tools by AAC experts were low-tech tools and simple digitized devices.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Romski M, Sevcik R A. Augmentative communication and early intervention: myths and realities.  Infants and Young Children. 2005;  18 174-185
  • 2 Sevcik R A, Romski M A, Adamson L B. Research directions in augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children.  Disabil Rehabil. 2004;  26 1323-1329
  • 3 Light J, Drager K, Carthy J et al.. Performance of typically developing four-and-five-year-old children with AAC systems using different language organization techniques.  Augment Altern Commun. 2004;  20 63-88
  • 4 Light J, Drager K D. AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: state of the science and future research directions.  Augment Altern Commun. 2007;  23 204-216
  • 5 Beukelman D R, Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD; Paul H. Brookes 2005
  • 6 Light J C, Parsons A R, Drager K. There's more to life than cookies: developing interactions for social closeness with beginning communicators who use AAC. In: Reichle J, Beukelman D, Light J Exemplary Practices for Beginning Communicators: Implications for AAC. Baltimore, MD; Paul H. Brookes 2002: 187-218
  • 7 Hustad K C, Shapley K L. AAC and natural speech in individuals with developmental disabilities. In: Light JC, Beukelman DR, Reichle J Communicative Competence for Individuals Who Use AAC. Baltimore, MD; Paul H. Brookes 2003: 147-162
  • 8 Hustad K C, Morehouse T M, Gutman M. AAC strategies for enhancing the usefulness of natural speech in children with severe intelligibility challenges. In: Reichle J, Beukelman D, Light J Exemplary Practices for Beginning Communicators: Implications for AAC. Baltimore, MD; Paul H. Brookes 2002: 433-452
  • 9 Hustad K C, Weismer G. A continuum of interventions for individuals with dysarthria: compensatory and Rehabilitative Approaches. In: Weismer G Motor Speech Disorders. San Diego, CA; Plural Publishing 2007: 261-303
  • 10 Beukelman D R, Yorkston K M, Garrett K L. An introduction to AAC services for adults with chronic medical conditions. In: Beukelman DR, Garrett KL, Yorkston KM Augmentative Communication Strategies for Adults with Actue or Chronic Medical Conditions. Baltimore, MD; Paul H. Brookes 2007: 1-15
  • 11 Drager K DR, Light J C, Speltz J C, Fallon K A, Jeffries L Z. The performance of typically developing 2 1/2 year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;  46 298-312
  • 12 Drager K DR, Light J, Carlson R et al.. Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year olds: effect of different layouts and menu approaches.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;  47 1133-1148
  • 13 Binger C, Light J. Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006;  37 200-208
  • 14 Burke R, Beukelman D R, Ball L, Horn C A. Augmentative and alternative communication technology learning part 1: augmentative and alternative communication intervention specialists.  Augment Altern Commun. 2002;  19 242-249
  • 15 McNaughton D, Light J, Gulla S. Opening up a 'whole new world': employer and co-worker perspectives on working with individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication.  Augment Altern Commun. 2003;  19 235-253
  • 16 McNaughton D, Light J, Arnold K. Getting your “wheel” in the door: The successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication.  Augment Altern Commun. 2002;  18 59-76
  • 17 Creswell J C. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage Publications 2003
  • 18 Bogdan R C, Biklen S K. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 1992
  • 19 World Health Organization .International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva, Switzerland; WHO 2002

Katherine C HustadPh.D. 

Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin

1500 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53705

Email: kchustad@wisc.edu

    >