Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2008; 12(1): 7-13
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027117
Literaturstudie

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Gibt es eine Evidenz für konservative Behandlungsansätze bei Spondylolyse oder Spondylolisthese?[1]

Is there Evidence for Conservative Treatment Interventions in Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis?I. Chorherr1
  • 1Praxis für Physiotherapie, Wien
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 5.2.2007

Manuskript akzeptiert: 3.5.2007

Publication Date:
31 January 2008 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Spondylolyse oder Spondylolisthese sind häufig gestellte Diagnosen, die sowohl Patienten mit Kreuzschmerzen als auch asymptomatische Probanden betreffen. Derzeit ist nicht klar, welche Mechanismen bei manchen Personen eine Progredienz mit mehr oder weniger Problemen verursachen, während andere mit gleichem Ausgangsbefund weitgehend symptomfrei bleiben. Der vorliegende Literaturreview untersucht und evaluiert die Effektivität konservativer Maßnahmen bei Spondylolyse und Spondylolisthese.

Abstract

Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis are common diagnoses which affect patients with back pain as well as asymptomatic subjects. At present it is not clear which mechanisms cause more or less progressive problems in some patients while others with the same clinical findings show almost no symptoms. This literature review investigates and evaluates the effectiveness of conservative interventions in spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

Schlüsselwörter

Spondylolyse - Spondylolisthese - konservative Behandlung - Übungen

Key words

spondylolysis - spondylolisthesis - conservative treatment - exercises

1 Die Literaturarbeit entstand im Rahmen der ÖVMPT-OMT-Ausbildung 2004/2006 in Linz.

Literatur

  • 1 Bell D F, Ehrlich M G, Zaleske D J. Brace treatment for symptomatic spondylolisthesis.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;  236 192-198
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Beutler WS, Fredrickson BE, Murtland A. et al . The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in 45-year follow-up evaluation.  Spine. 2003;  28 1027-1035, discussion 1035
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Blanda J, Bethem D, Moats W. et al . Defects of pars interarticularis in athletes: a protocol for nonoperative treatment.  J Spinal Disord. 1993;  6 406-411
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Engelhardt M, Reuter I, Freiwald J. et al . Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis and sports.  Orthopäde. 1997;  26 755-759
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J. et al . Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial.  BMJ. 2005;  330 1233
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Frederickson B E, Baker D, McHolick W J. et al . The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;  66 699-707
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Fujii K, Katoh S, Sairyo K. et al . Union of defects in the pars interarticularis of the lumbar spine in children and adolescents. The radiological outcome after conservative treatment.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;  86 225-231
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Gramse R R, Sinaki M, Ilstrup D M. Lumbar spondylolisthesis: a rational approach to conservative treatment.  Mayo Clin Proc. 1980;  55 681-686
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Grimmer K. Evidence Based Physiotherapy Workbook. Centre of Allied Health and Research. Adelaide: University of South Australia, 2001. 
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Hammerberg K W. New concepts on the pathogenesis and classification of spondylolisthesis.  Spine. 2005;  30 S4-S11
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Handa N, Yamamoto H, Tani T. et al . The effect of trunk muscle exercises in patients over 40 years of age with chronic low back pain.  J Orthop Sci. 2000;  5 210-216
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Harris I E, Weinstein S L. Long-term follow-up of patients with grade-III and IV spondylolisthesis. Treatment with and without posterior fusion.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;  69 960-969
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Iwamoto J, Takeda T, Wakano K. Returning athletes with severe low back pain and spondylolysis to original sporting activities with conservative treatment.  Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004;  14 346-351
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Lonstein J E. Spondylolisthesis in children. Cause, natural history, and management.  Spine. 1999;  24 2640-2648
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Matsunaga S, Ijiri K, Hayashi K. Nonsurgically managed patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a 10- to 18-year follow-up study.  J Neurosurg. 2000;  93 194-198
    Google Scholar
  • 16 McNeely M L, Torrance G, Magee D J. A systematic review of physiotherapy for spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.  Man Ther. 2003;  8 80-91
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Meyerding H. Spondylolisthesis.  Surg Gynecol Obstetr. 1932;  54 371
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Mierau D, Cassidy J D, McGregor M. et al . A comparison of the effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain patients with and without spondylolisthesis.  J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987;  10 49-55
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Möller H, Hedlund R. Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis - a prospective randomized study. Part 1.  Spine. 2000;  25 1711-1715
    Google Scholar
  • 20 O’Sullivan P B, Phyty G D, Twomey L T. et al . Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis.  Spine. 1997;  22 2959-2267
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Panjabi M M. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I: Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement.  J Spinal Disord. 1992;  5 383-389; discussion: 397
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Panjabi M M. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II: Neutral zone and instability hypothesis.  J Spinal Disord. 1992;  5 390-396; discussion: 397
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Panjabi M M. Clinical spinal instability and low back pain.  J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;  13 371-379
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Simotas A C. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;  384 153-161
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Sinaki M, Lutness M P, Ilstrup D M. et al . Lumbar spondylolisthesis: retrospective comparison and three-year follow-up of two conservative treatment programs.  Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 1989;  70 594-598
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Spratt K F, Weinstein J N, Lehmann T R. et al . Efficacy of flexion and extension treatments incorporating braces for low- back pain patients with retrodisplacement, spondylolisthesis, or normal sagittal translation.  Spine. 1993;  18 1839-1849
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Steiner M E, Micheli L J. Treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis with the modified Boston brace.  Spine. 1985;  10 937-943
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Sano S. Evaluation of clinical lumbar instability using the treadmill.  Spine. 1993;  18 2321-2324
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Vibert B T, Sliva C D, Herkowitz H N. Treatment of Instability and Spondylolisthesis: Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;  443 222-227
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Wiltse L L, Newman P H, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;  117 23-29
    Google Scholar
  • 31 www.altavista.com
  • 32 www.bmjjournals.com
  • 33 www.chirogeek.com
  • 34 www.ejbjs.com
  • 35 www.google.at
  • 36 www.thieme.connect.de

1 Die Literaturarbeit entstand im Rahmen der ÖVMPT-OMT-Ausbildung 2004/2006 in Linz.

Irmgard Chorherr, PT

Lerchenfelder Str. 78 - 80 / 30

1080 Wien

Österreich

Email: irmgard.chorherr@chello.at

      >