Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2007; 116(9): 414-420
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-991504
CME-Fortbildung

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Adhäsive Zahnmedizin: Ist eine Optimierung im Arbeitsablauf möglich? - Update 2007

R. Frankenberger, C. Onczul, M. Taschner
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 September 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Lernziele:

Der Leser sollte nach dem Durcharbeiten dieses Artikels

  • die Klassifikation marktüblicher Adhäsive beherrschen,

  • eine kritische Wertung aktueller Adhäsionsstrategien vornehmen können,

  • verstehen, was sich hinter „Water wet Bonding” und „Ethanol wet

  • g” verbirgt und wie dies in der Praxis umzusetzen ist,

  • umsetzen können, wie gängige Adhäsive in ihrer Anwendung optimiert werden können und

  • erkennen, dass es für das klinische Resultat nicht zuträglich ist, Zeitersparnis in den Fokus zu stellen.

Literatur

  • 1 Attin T, Buchalla W, Hellwig E.. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites.  J Prosthet Dent. 1996;  76 29-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bergenholtz G.. Evidence for bacterial causation of adverse pulpal responses in resin-based dental restorations.  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000;  11 467-480
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bergenholtz G.. Inflammatory response of the dental pulp to bacterial irritation.  J Endod. 1981;  7 100-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA.. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp.  J Oral Pathol. 1982;  11 439-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Buonocore MG.. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces.  J Dent Res. 1955;  34 849-854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR.. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives.  Biomaterials. 2005;  26 1035-1042
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chersoni S, Suppa P, Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Yiu C, Huang C, Prati C, Breschi L, Ferrari M, Pashley DH, Tay FR.. In vivo and in vitro permeability of one-step self-etch adhesives.  J Dent Res. 2004;  83 459-464
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 De Munck J, Braem M, Wevers M, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.. Micro-rotary fatigue of tooth-biomaterial interfaces.  Biomaterials. 2005;  26 1145-1153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 De Munck J, Van MB, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.  Am J Dent. 2003;  16 414-420
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 De Munck J, Van MB, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin.  J Dent Res. 2003;  82 136-140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A.. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives.  Clin Oral Investig. 1999;  3 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A.. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation.  Oper Dent. 2000;  25 11-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A.. Technique sensitivity of dentin Bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation.  Oper Dent. 2000;  25 324-330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Reich SM, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Tay FR.. Characterisation of resin-dentine interfaces by compressive cyclic loading.  Biomaterials. 2005;  26 2043-2052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. „No-bottle” vs „multi-bottle” dentin adhesives - a microtensile bond strength and morphological study.  Dent Mater. 2001;  17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A.. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.  Oper Dent. 1999;  24 147-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Winterscheidt J, Winterscheidt B, Petschelt A.. Evaluation of the fatigue behavior of the resin-dentin bond with the use of different methods.  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;  67 712-721
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Lohbauer U, Kramer N, Petschelt A.. The effect of six years of water storage on resin composite Bonding to human dentin.  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;  69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Frankenberger R, Tay FR.. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.  Dent Mater. 2005;  21 397-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hamid A, Hume WR.. The effect of dentine thickness on diffusion of resin monomers in vitro.  J Oral Rehabil. 1997;  24 20-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hamid A, Sutton W, Hume WR.. Variation in phosphoric acid concentration and treatment time and HEMA diffusion through dentin.  Am J Dent. 1996;  9 211-214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hebling J, Giro EM, Costa CA.. Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities.  J Dent. 1999;  27 557-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, Waller JL, Pashley DH.. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin Bonding.  J Adhes Dent. 2005;  7 133-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R.. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition.  Oper Dent. 2004;  29 481-508
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R.. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin.  Dent Mater. 2004;  20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pashley DH.. Mechanisms of dentin sensitivity.  Dent Clin North Am. 1990;  34 449-473
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pashley DH, Michelich V, Kehl T.. Dentin permeability: effects of smear layer removal.  J Prosthet Dent. 1981;  46 531-537
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pashley DH, Pashley EL, Carvalho RM, Tay FR.. The effects of dentin permeability on restorative dentistry.  Dent Clin North Am. 2002;  46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Pashley DH, Tay FR, Carvalho RM, Rueggeberg FA, Agee KA, Carrilho M, Donnelly A, Garcia-Godoy F.. From dry Bonding to Water-wet Bonding to Ethanol-wet Bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer.  Am J Dent. 2007;  20 7-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Perdigao J, Frankenberger R.. Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion.  Quintessence Int. 2001;  32 385-390
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L.. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion.  Am J Dent. 2000;  13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Perdigao J, Van MB, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW.. The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin Bonding.  Dent Mater. 1999;  15 282-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De MJ, Van LK, Lambrechts P, Van MB.. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials.  Dent Mater. 2005;  21 864-881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Peumans M, Munck J, Van LK, Lambrechts P, Van MB.. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.  Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;  113 512-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sadek FT, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Tay FR.. Tubular occlusion optimizes Bonding of hydrophobic resins to dentin.  J Dent Res. 2007;  86 524-528
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sadek FT, Pashley DH, Nishitani Y, Carrilho MR, Donnelly A, Ferrari M, Tay FR.. Application of hydrophobic resin adhesives to acid-etched dentin with an alternative wet Bonding technique. J Biomed Mater Res 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Schmalz G.. The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials.  Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;  106 696-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Nunez LJ, Stoll J, Weis K.. Permeability characteristics of bovine and human dentin under different pretreatment conditions.  J Endod. 2001;  27 23-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH.. Pit and fissure sealing. Bonding of bulk-cured, low-filled, light-curing resins to bacteria-contaminated uncut enamel in high c-factor cavities.  Am J Dent. 2005;  18 28-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence.  J Dent. 2004;  32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Garcia-Godoy F, Yiu CK.. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part II. Silver tracer penetration evidence.  Am J Dent. 2004;  17 315-322
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carvalho R, Miller M.. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence.  Am J Dent. 2004;  17 271-278
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Van Meerbeek B., Yoshida Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K, Pashley DH.. Hybridization effectiveness of a two-step versus a three-step smear layer removing adhesive system examined correlatively by TEM and AFM.  J Adhes Dent. 1999;  1 7-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt KL, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.  Oper Dent. 2003;  28 215-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De J Munck, Van Landuyt KL, Lambrechts P, Peumans M.. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel.  Dent Mater. 2005;  21 375-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.. The clinical performance of adhesives.  J Dent. 1998;  26 1-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL, De MJ, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K.. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives.  Dent Mater J. 2005;  24 1-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Korrespondenzadresse

Prof. Dr. med. dent. Roland Frankenberger

FICD, FADM Zahnklinik 1 - Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Glückstr. 11

91054 Erlangen

Email: frankbg@dent.uni-erlangen.de

      >