Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2007; 28(4): 334-342
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-986530
© Thieme Medical Publishers

The Application of the ICF in Cognitive-Communication Disorders following Traumatic Brain Injury

Brigette Larkins1
  • 1Project Manager, Older Persons' Health Service, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand; Associate Member, Communication Disability in Ageing Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 October 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to discuss the usefulness of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for describing cognitive-communication disorders. Prominent issues influencing our appreciation of cognitive-communication disorders are elaborated. These are issues with terminology, assessment (including the role of supporting cognitive processes), and the sociocultural context of the individual with cognitive-communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is followed by a demonstration of how the ICF framework supports a systematic approach for understanding cognitive-communication disorders in individuals who have sustained a TBI. Finally an example of the ICF applied to the rehabilitation of a woman with cognitive-communication disorders following a TBI is presented.

KEYWORDS

Cognitive-communication disorders - ICF

REFERENCES

  • 1 Prigatano G, Roueche J, Fordyce D. Nonaphasic language disturbances after brain injury. In: Prigatano GP Neuropsychological Rehabilitation after Brain Injury. Baltimore, MD; John Hopkins University Press 1986: 18-28
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Hartley L L. Cognitive-Communication Abilities Following Brain Injury. A Functional Approach. San Diego; Singular 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Davis G A. Aphasiology Disorders and Clinical Practice. Needham Heights, MA; Allyn & Bacon 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Ylvisaker M, Hanks R, Johnson-Greene D. Perspectives on rehabilitation of individuals with cognitive impairment after brain injury: rationale for reconsideration of theoretical paradigms.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;  17(3) 191-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 McDonald S, Togher L, Code C. Communication Disorders Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Hove, United Kingdom; Psychology Press 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 6 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association . The role of speech language pathologists in the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of individuals with cognitive-communicative impairments.  ASHA. 1988;  30 79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ylvisaker M, Szekeres S, Feeney T J. Communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury. In: Chapey R Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD; Williams and Wilkins 2000: 745-809
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Brooks N, McKinlay W, Symington C, Beattie A, Campsie L. Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury.  Brain Inj. 1987;  1 5-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Godfrey H PD, Bishara S, Partridge F, Knight R. Neuropsychological impairment and return to work following severe closed head injury: Implications for clinical management.  N Z Med J. 1993;  106 301-303
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Godfrey H PD, Shum D. Executive functioning and the application of social skills following traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14(4) 433-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Groher M. Communication disorders in adults. In: Rosenthal M, Griffith ER, Bond MC, Miller JD Rehabilitation of the Adult and Child with Traumatic Brain Injury. 2nd ed. Philadelphia; F.A. Davis 1990: 148-162
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Murdoch B E. Communication impairments following traumatic brain injury: the neglected sequelae. In International Perspectives in Traumatic Brain Injury. Proceedings of the 5th conference of the International Association for the Study of Traumatic Brain Injury and 20th Conference of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment. Bowen Hills, Australia; Australian Academic Press 1996: 280-290
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Snow P, Ponsford J. Assessing and managing changes in communication and interpersonal skills following TBI. In: Ponsford J, Sloan S, Snow P Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation for Everyday Adaptive Living. Hove, United Kingdom; Lawrence Erlbaum 1995: 137-164
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Ylvisaker M, Jacobs H E, Feeney T. Positive supports for people who experience behavioral and cognitive disability after brain injury.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;  18(1) 7-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 McDonald S. Putting communication disorders in context after traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14(4) 339-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 World Health Organization .International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland; WHO 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Groher M. Language and memory disorders following closed head trauma.  J Speech Hear Res. 1977;  20 212-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Heilman K M, Safran A, Geschwind N. Closed head trauma and aphasia.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971;  34 265-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sarno M T. The nature of verbal impairment after closed head injury.  J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980;  168 685-692
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sarno M T. Verbal impairment after closed head injury: report of a replication study.  J Nerv Ment Dis. 1984;  172 475-479
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sarno M T, Buonaguro A, Levita E. Characteristics of verbal impairment after closed head injury.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;  67 400-405
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Holland A. When is aphasia, aphasia? The problem of closed head injury. In: Brookshire RH Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN; BRK 1982: 345-349
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Halpern H, Darley F L, Brown J R. Differential language and neurological characteristics in cerebral involvement.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1973;  38 162-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hagen C. Language disorders secondary to closed head injury: diagnosis and treatment.  Top Lang Disord. 1981;  1 73-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Godfrey H PD, Knight R, Marsh N, Moroney B, Bishara B. Social interaction and speed of information processing following very severe head injury.  Psychol Med. 1989;  19 175-182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Penn C, Cleary J. Compensatory strategies in the language of closed head injured patients.  Brain Inj. 1988;  2 3-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J, Kinch J. TASIT: a new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;  18 219-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Prutting C A, Kirschner D M. A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1987;  52 105-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Milton S B, Prutting C A, Binder G M. Appraisal of communicative competence in head injured adults. In: Brookshire RH Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN; BRK 1984: 114-123
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Ponsford J, Olver J, Ponsford M, Nelms R. Long term adjustment of families following traumatic brain injury where comprehensive rehabilitation has been provided.  Brain Inj. 2003;  17(6) 453-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tucker F M, Hanlon R E. Effects of mild traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse production.  Brain Inj. 1998;  12(9) 783-792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Measuring service encounters in the traumatic brain injury population.  Aphasiology. 1997;  11 491-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Collaborative Brain Injury Intervention, Positive Everyday Routines. San Diego, CA; Singular 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Godfrey H PD, Knight R. The relationship between social skill and family problem solving following very severe closed head injury.  Brain Inj. 1991;  5 207-211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners.  Brain Inj. 1997;  11 169-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Togher L W, McDonald S, Code C, Grant S. Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial.  Aphasiology. 2004;  18 313-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sohlberg M, Mateer C. Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation, Theory and Practise. New York; Guilford 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Ylvisaker M, Szekeres S, Henry K, Sullivan D, Wheeler P. Topics in cognitive rehabilitation therapy. In: Ylvisaker M, Gobble E Community Re-Entry for Head Injured Adults. Boston, MA; Little Brown 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Ylvisaker M, Urbanczyk B, Feeney T J. Social skills following traumatic brain injury.  Semin Speech Lang. 1992;  13 239-251
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ylvisaker M. Communication outcome following traumatic brain injury.  Semin Speech Lang. 1992;  13 239-251
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 McDonald S, Pearce S. Requests that overcome listener reluctance: impairment associated with executive dysfunction in brain injury.  Brain Lang. 1998;  61 88-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Togher L. TBI rehabilitation: The road less travelled. Keynote presentation at: 10th International Aphasiology Conference July 2002 Brisbane, Australia;
    Google Scholar
  • 43 McDonald S. Communication disorders following closed head injury: new approaches to assessment and rehabilitation.  Brain Inj. 1992;  6 283-292
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 McDonald S. Differential pragmatic loss following severe closed head injury; Inability to comprehend conversational implicature.  Applied Psycholinguistics. 1992;  13 295-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 McDonald S. Viewing the brain sideways? Frontal versus right hemisphere explanations of non aphasic language disorders.  Aphasiology. 1993;  7 535-549
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: a comparison across two control groups.  Brain Inj. 1997;  11 409-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 McDonald S. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: ability to meet the informational needs of the listener.  Brain Lang. 1993;  44 28-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Grice H P. Logic in conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. New York; Academic Press 1975: 41-58
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Worrall L. A conceptual framework for a functional approach to acquired neurogenic disorders and swallowing. In: Worrall L, Frattalli C Neurogenic Communication Disorders. A Functional Approach. New York; Thieme 2000: 3-18
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Larkins B, Worrall L, Hickson L. Everyday communication activities of individuals with traumatic brain injury living in New Zealand.  Asia Pacific J Speech Lang Hearing. 1999;  4 183-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Larkins B, Worrall L, Hickson L. Stakeholder opinion of functional communication activities following traumatic brain injury.  Brain Inj. 2004;  18 691-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Worrall L, McCooey R, Davidson B, Larkins B, Hickson L. The validity of functional assessments of communication and the Activity/Participation components of the ICIDH-2: do they reflect what really happens in real life?.  J Commun Disord. 2002;  35 107-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T J. Executive functions after traumatic brain injury: supported cognition and self advocacy.  Semin Speech Lang. 1996;  17 217-232
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Huer M B, Saenz T I. Challenges and strategies for conducting survey and focus group research with culturally diverse groups.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003;  12 209-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Larkins B. Functional communication assessment of individuals with traumatic brain injury living in New Zealand. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Queensland, Australia; University of Queensland 2004
    Google Scholar

Dr. Brigette Larkins

Older Persons' Health Service, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board

Private Bag 800, Christchurch, New Zealand

Email: Brigette.Larkins@cdhb.govt.nz

      >