Download PDF
Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2007; 17(5): 275-280
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-985369
Weiter- und Fortbildung

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Konservative Ansätze beim Karpaltunnelsyndrom

Conservative Management of carpal Tunnel SyndromeM. Y. Keilani 1 , T. Paternostro-Sluga 1 , V. Fialka-Moser 1 , J. Holzapfel 1 , R. Crevenna 1
  • 1Universitätsklinik für Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Medizinische Universität Wien, AKH-Wien
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 11.4.2007

angenommen: 18.7.2007

Publication Date:
26 October 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel dieser Literaturübersicht ist es, die konservativ-therapeutischen Möglichkeiten des Karpaltunnelsyndrom (KTS) darzustellen. Eine EDV-unterstützte Literatursuche wurde unter Verwendung gängiger Literaturdatenbanken zur Beantwortung o. g. Fragestellung durchgeführt. Berücksichtigt wurden systematische Übersichtsarbeiten über randomisierte kontrollierte Studien und Originalarbeiten, die sich mit diesem Thema beschäftigen. Lege artis erfolgt die Diagnose des KTS durch Anamnese, klinische und elektrodiagnostische Untersuchung. Die the-rapeutischen Möglichkeiten beinhalten 1) ein operatives oder 2) ein nicht operatives Vorgehen. Dabei können primär konservative Therapiemaßnahmen wie z. B. Infiltrationen (Evidenzgrad B), Schienenbehandlung (Evidenzgrad B), Ultraschalltherapie (Evidenzgrad B), Iontophorese (unkontrollierte Studien) angeboten werden. Bei operierten Patienten besteht die Rehabilitation einerseits in einer Bewegungstherapie und einem Funktionstraining der Hand (Evidenzgrad B), andererseits in einer konsequenten Narbenbehandlung mittels Ultraschall- und Lasertherapie und einer Behandlung von postoperati-ven Schwellungen mittels z. B. Lymphdrainagen, CO2-Bädern, etc. Die Behandlung postoperativer Schmerzzustände der Hand erfolgt mittels medikamentöser (Evidenzlevel A) und physikalischer Therapiemaßnahmen. Die Etablierung sog. „State of the art”-Regime in Diagnostik und Therapie ist ein wichtiger Schritt zur Optimierung der Betreuung von KTS-Patienten mit konservativen Maßnahmen. Aufgrund der limitierten Datenlage erscheinen künftige, randomisierte, kontrollierte klinische Studien zu diesem Thema dringend notwendig.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of non-operative treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). These treatment options include 1) (only) conservative treatments and 2) postoperative rehabilitation. Meta-analyses and original articles concerning this topic were included in this investigation. State of the art CTS can be diagnosed by anamnesis, physical examination, and electrophysiological investigation. Treatment-options of CTS are 1) surgical treatment and 2) non surgical treatment options like splinting (evidence level B), steroid injections (evidence level B), ultrasound treatment (evidence level B), iontophoresis. After surgical treatment, rehabilitation goals are achieved by using different active and passive modalities. These are physiotherapy and ergotherapy (to accelerate recovery) (evidence Level B), ultrasound and Laser-therapy (for treatment of scars), lymph-massage and Co2-baths (for treatment of swelling and oedema). After surgical treatment pain is treated using pharmacological (evidence level A) and physical-medical modalities. Establishing so called “state of the art regimen” in diagnosis and therapy is a very important step to optimize the treatment of patients suffering from CTS. Due to the lack of knowledge about this topic, further randomised controlled high quality clinical studies investigating the non-surgical treatment options of CTS would be necessary.

Schlüsselwörter

Karpaltunnelsyndrom - konservative Therapiemaßnahmen - postoperative Rehabilitaion - „state of the art”

Key words

Carpal tunnel syndrome - non-surgical treatment options - postoperative Rehabilitation - “state of the art”

Literatur

  • 1 Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population.  Neurology. 2002;  58 289-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fialka Moser V, Worseg A, Zifko U. Karpaltunnel-Syndrom. Leoben-Stuttgart: Kneipp Verlag 2001
  • 3 Marshall S, Tardif G, Ashworth N. Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;  (4) , CD001554. Review
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) (Hrsg) .Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation. Oxford: CEBM 2001
  • 5 Tulder MW Van, Scholten RJPM, Koes BW, Deyo RA. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low-back pain.  [Systematic Review] Cochrane Back Group Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;  4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cocito D, Tavella A, Ciaramitaro P, Costa P, Poglio F, Paolasso I, Duranda E, Cossa FM, Bergamasco B. A further critical evaluation of requests for electro diagnostic examinations.  Neurol Sci. 2006;  26 419-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Graham B. The diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.  BMJ. 2006;  332 1463-1464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Quartly CA, Vennix MJ, Wilson JR.. , (2002 Jun 11) Second AAEM literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMed
  • 9 Bland JD. A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Muscle Nerve. 2000;  23 1280-1283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Giannini F, Cioni R, Mondelli M, Padua R, Gregori B, D'Amico P, Padua L. A new clinical scale of carpal tunnel syndrome: validation of the measurement and clinical-neurophysiological assessment.  Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;  113 71-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy HD, GG Hohl, Fossel AH, Katz JN. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1993;  75 1585-1592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ. Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 2004;  29 159-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schuind FA, Mouraux D, Robert C, Brassinne E, Remy P, Salvia P, Meyer A, Moulart F, Burny F. Functional and outcome evaluation of the hand and wrist.  Hand Clin. 2003;  19 361-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Randolph JA. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Testing the sensitivity and validity of four „localized discomfort” instruments.  AAOHN J. 2000;  48 385-394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vaile JH, Mathers DM, Ramos-Remus C, Russell AS. Generic health instruments do not comprehensively capture patient perceived improvement in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Rheumatol. 1999;  26 1163-1166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Baysal O, Altay Z, Ozcan C, Ertem K, Yologlu S, Kayhan A. Comparison of three conservative treatment protocols in carpal tunnel syndrome.  Int J Clin Pract. 2006;  60 820-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ucan H, Yagci I, Yilmaz L, Yagmurlu F, Keskin D, Bodur H. Comparison of splinting, splinting plus local steroid injection and open carpal tunnel release outcomes in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.  Rheumatol Int. 2006;  27 45-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Agarwal V, Singh R, Sachdev A, Wiclaff, Shekhar S, Goel D. A prospective study of the long-term efficacy of local methyl prednisolone acetate injection in the management of mild carpal tunnel syndrome.  Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;  44 647-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hagebeuk EE, Weerd AW de. Clinical and electrophysiological follow-up after local steroid injection in the carpal tunnel syndrome.  Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;  115 1464-1468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Keilani MY, Paternostro-Sluga T, Crevenna R, Zauner-Dungl A, Fialka-Moser V. Splints in occupational therapy of the hand in an Austrian central hospital-current status.  Wien Med Wochenschr. 2003;  153 222-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Manente G, Torrieri F, Blasio F Di, Staniscia T, Romano F, Uncini A. An innovative hand brace for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.  Muscle Nerve. 2001;  24 1020-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 O'Connor D, Marshall S, Massy-Westropp N. Non-surgical treatment (other than steroid injection) for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;  (1) CD003219
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Walker WC, Metzler M, Cifu DX, Swartz Z. Neutral wrist splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison of night-only versus full time wear instructions.  Arch Phys Med. 2000;  81 424-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Burke DT, Burke MM, Stewart GW, Cambre A. Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome: in search of the optimal angle.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;  75 1241-1244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gerritsen AA, Korthals-de Bos IB, Laboyrie PM, Vet HC de, Scholten RJ, Bouter LM. Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome: prognostic indicators of success.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;  74 1342-1344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sevim S, Dogu O, Camdeviren H, Kaleagasi H, Aral M, Arslan E, Milcan A. Long-term effectiveness of steroid injections and splinting in mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.  Neurol Sci. 2004;  25 48-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Muller M, Tsui D, Schnurr R, Biddulph-Deisroth L, Hard J, MacDermid JC. Effectiveness of hand therapy interventions in primary management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review.  J Hand Ther. 2004;  17 210-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Werner RA, Franzblau A, Gell N. Randomized controlled trial of nocturnal splinting for active workers with symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;  86 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Premoselli S, Sioli P, Grossi A, Cerri C. Neutral wrist splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome: a 3- and 6-months clinical and neurophysiologic follow-up evaluation of night-only splint therapy.  Eura Medicophys. 2006;  42 121-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Armstrong T, Devor W, Borschel L, Contreras R. Intracarpal steroid injection is safe and effective for short-term management of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Muscle Nerve. 2004;  29 82-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gokoglu F, Fndkoglu G, Yorgancoglu ZR, Okumus M, Ceceli E, Kocaoglu S. Evaluation of iontophoresis and local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;  84 92-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ebenbichler GR, Resch KL, Nicolakis P, Wiesinger GF, Uhl F, Ghanem AH, Fialka V. Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised „sham” controlled trial.  BMJ. 1998;  316 731-735
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Bakhtiary AH, Rashidy-Pour A. (2004) Ultrasound and laser therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Aust J Physiother. 2004;  50 147-151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gelberman RH, Aronson D, Weisman MH. Carpal-tunnel syndrome. Results of a prospective trial of steroid injection and splinting.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;  62 1181-1184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Weiss AP, Sachar K, Gendreau M. Conservative management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a re-examination of steroid injection and splinting.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1994;  19 410-415
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Graham RG, Hudson DA, Solomons M, Singer M. A prospective study to assess the outcome of steroid injections and wrist splinting for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 550-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Banta CA. A prospective, nonrandomized study of iontophoresis, wrist splinting, and anti-inflammatory medication in the treatment of early-mild carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Occup Med. 1994;  36 166-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Verhagen AP, Karels C, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Burdorf L, Feleus A, Dahaghin S, Vet HC de, Koes BW. Ergonomic and physiotherapeutic interventions for treating work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev.. 2006;  3 CD003471 , Review
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Verdugo RJ, Salinas RS, Castillo J, Cea JG. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;  (3) CD001552 , Review
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ly-Pen D, Andreu JL, Blas G de, Sanchez-Olaso A, Millan I. Surgical decompression versus local steroid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome: a one-year, prospective, randomized, open, controlled clinical trial.  Arthritis Rheum. 2005;  52 612-619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hui AC, Wong S, Leung CH, Tong P, Mok V, Poon D, Li-Tsang CW, Wong LK, Boet R. A randomized controlled trial of surgery vs steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Neurology. 2005;  64 2074-2078
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Provinciali L, Giattini A, Splendiani G, Logullo F. Usefulness of Hand rehabilitation after carpal tunnel surgery.  Muscle Verve. 2000;  23 211-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Barden J, Edwards J, Moore RA, MacQuay HJ. Single dose oral diclofenac for postoperative pain.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;  (2) CD004768 , Review
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Barden J, Edwards J, Moore RA, MacQuay HJ. Single dose oral rofecoxib for postoperative pain.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;  25 CD004604 , Review
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Cancer, pain relief and palliative care . , Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990. WHO Technical Report Series No. 408
  • 46 Angelis R De, Salaffi F, Filippucci E, Grassi W. Carpal tunnel syndrome treatment.  Rheumatismo. 2006;  58 5-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Scholten RJ, Gerritsen AA, Uitdehaag BM, Geldere D van, Vet HC de, Bouter LM. Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;  18 CD003905 , Review
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ganglberger JA, Grunert V, Muller MM, Zaunbauer F. Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom.  Wien Med Wochenschr. 1974;  124 490-495
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Kollmann HG. Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom: Ursachen, Symptomatik, Therapie.  Wien Med Wochenschr. 1985;  135 517-521
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Korrespondenzadresse

Dr. M. Y. Keilani

Universitätsklinik f. Physikalische Medizin u. Rehabilitation

MUW

AKH-Wien

Währinger Gürtel 18-20

1090 Wien

Österreich

Phone: +43/1/40400 43 30

Fax: +43/1/40400 52 81

Email: mohammad.keilani@meduniwien.ac.at

      >