Download PDF
Gastroenterologie up2date 2007; 3(1): 67-82
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966342
Endoskopie/Gastrointestinale Radiologie/Sonographie

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Sedierung in der Endoskopie: Vorbereitung, Medikamentenapplikation und Überwachung

Andrea  Riphaus, Till  Wehrmann
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 April 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Einleitung

Der Stellenwert der Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie hat in den letzten Jahren zunehmend an Interesse gewonnen und ist derzeit Gegenstand vieler, teils auch kontroverser Diskussionen.

Neben der Besprechung der optimalen Patientenvorbereitung, die zusätzlich zu einer adäquaten Aufklärung über die Sedierung auch die Risikostratifizierung des einzelnen Patienten - in Hinblick auf das Auftreten etwaiger Komplikationen - beinhaltet, soll ein Überblick über die derzeit gebräuchlichsten Sedativa und Analgetika (insbesondere unter Berücksichtigung der kurz wirksamen Substanzen) gegeben werden. Inwieweit die in der Schweiz und Teilen der USA bereits praktizierte Delegation der Sedierung mit Propofol an nichtärztliches Assistenzpersonal („nurse administered propofol sedation”) unter aktuellen juristischen Aspekten auch in Deutschland möglich ist, wird ausführlich erörtert. Ein entsprechendes Patientenmonitoring ist in jedem Fall als obligat anzusehen, wobei es zu prüfen gilt, ob neuere Monitoringverfahren hier eine sinnvolle und im klinischen Alltag auch praktikable Ergänzung darstellen. Eine aktuell in Entwicklung begriffene S3-Leitlinie „Sedierung in der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie” wird hoffentlich noch in diesem Jahr mehr Klarheit hinsichtlich noch offener Fragen und Unsicherheiten bringen.

Literatur

  • 1 American Society of Anaesthesiologists . Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non- anaesthesiologists: a report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anaesthesiologists.  Anaesthesiology. 1996;  84 459-471
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Smith M R, Bell G D, Fulton B. et al . A comparison of winged steel needles and Teflon cannulas in maintaining intravenous access during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 33-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 317-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 American Society of Anaesthesiologists . Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anaesthesiologists: a report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anaesthesiologists.  Anaesthesiology. 1996;  84 459-471
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Daneshmend T K, Bell G D, Logan F R. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: result of a nationwide survey.  Gut. 1991;  32 12-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Keefe E B, O’Connor K W. 1989 ASGE survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 S13-S18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Froehlich F, Gonvers J J, Fried M. Conscious sedation, clinically relevant complications and monitoring of endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 231-234
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Quine M A, Bell G D, McCloy R F. et al . Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England; Safety, staffing, and sedation methods.  Gut. 1995;  36 462-467
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Heisenbach T. How safe is premedication in ambulatory endoscopy in Germany? A prospective study in gastroenterology specialty practices.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000;  125 1288-1289
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Van Houten J S, Crane S A, Janardan S K, Wells K. A randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of midazolam (Versed) and emulsified diazepam (Dizac) for opioid-based, conscious sedation in endoscopic procedures.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 170-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Macken E, Gevers A M, Hendrickx A. et al . Midazolam versus diazepam in lipid emulsion as conscious sedation for colonoscopy with or without reversal of sedation with flumazenil.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 57-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zakko S F, Seifert H A, Gross J B. A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for conscious sedation during colonoscopy in a prospective double-blind study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 684-689
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kostash M A, Johnston R, Bailey R J. et al . Sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind comparison of diazepam/meperidine, midazolam/fentanyl and propofol/fentanyl combinations.  Can J Gastroenterol. 1994;  8 27-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Diab F H, King P D, Barthel J S. et al . Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared with midazolam alone.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1120-1125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schwertner C, Mayr M, Leistert H. et al . Risks, but no benefits, of a midazolam-fentanyl combination as a premedication of ERCP [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 1996;  110 A38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Froehlich F, Thorens J, Schwizer W. et al . Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Laluna L, Allen M L, Dimarino Jr A J. The comparison of midazolam and topical lidocaine spray versus the combination of midazolam, meperidine, and topical lidocaine spray to sedate patients for upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 289-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fisher N C, Bailey S, Gibson J A. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 21-24
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Eckardt V S, Kanzler G, Schmitt T. et al . Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 560-565
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rex D K, Imperiale T F, Portish V. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 554-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M. et al . Is routinely given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy? Is routinely given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 566-572
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Terruzzi V, Meucci G, Radaelli F. et al . Routine versus „on demand” sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 169-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sorbi D, Gostout C J, Henry J. et al . Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD: a comparative study.  Gastroenterology. 1999;  117 1301-1307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Garcia R T, Cello J P, Nguyen M H. et al . Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  125 1606-1612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Thota P N, Zuccaio Jr G, Vargo 2nd J J. et al . A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 559-565
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Liebermann D A, Wuerker C K, Katon R M. Cardiopulmonary risk of esopagogastroduodenoscopy. Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation.  Gastroenterology. 1985;  88 468-472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cooper M W, Davison C M, Uastin C A. Arterial oxygen saturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients: the role of endoscope diameter.  Age Ageing. 1995;  24 254-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Patterson K W, Casey P B, Murray J P. et al . Propofol sedation for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with midazolam.  Br J Anaesth. 1991;  67 108-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Carlsson U, Grattidge P. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 240-243
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Meining A, Semmler V, Kassem A M. et al . The effect of sedation on the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: an investigator-blinded, randomized study comparing propofol with midazolam.  Endoscopy. 2007;  7 [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wehrmann T, Kokabpick S, Lembcke B. et al . Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a prospective, controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 677-683
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R. et al . Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 233-238
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Vargo J J, Zuccaro Jr G, Dumot J A. Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  123 8-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedierung mittels Propofol vs. Midazolam/Pethidin bei der ERCP von älteren Hochrisikopatienten.  Endoskopie heute. 2004;  17 69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Clarke G A, Jacobson B C, Hammet R J. et al . The indications, utilization and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy in an extremely elderly patient cohort.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 580-584
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Seinela L, Ahvenainen J, Ronneikko J. et al . Reasons for and outcome of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients aged 85 years or more: retrospective study.  BMJ. 1998;  317 575-580
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Van Kouwen M C, Drenth J P, Verhoeven H M. et al . Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients aged 85 years or more. Results of a feasibility study in a district general hospital.  Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2003;  37 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Qureshi W A, Zuckermann M J, Adler D G. et al . ASGE guideline: modifications in endoscopic practice for the elderly.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 566-569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Muravchick S. Anesthesia for the geriatric patient. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK (eds) Clinical Anesthesia 4th ed. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2001: 1205-1216
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Reimann F M, Samson U, Derad I. et al . Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 239-244
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Seifert H, Schmitt T H, Gultekin T. et al . Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;  14 1207-1214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 VanNatta M E, Rex D K. Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2209-2217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Akcaboy Z N, Akcaboy E Y, Albayrak D. et al . Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care?.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;  50 736-741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Sipe B W, Rex D K, Latinovich D. Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 815-825. Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56 : 324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Heuss L T, Schnieper P, Drewe J. et al . Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 664-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Ehlers A PF, Bitter H. Delegierung der Propofol-Applikation an Nicht-ärztliches Assistenzpersonal.  Endo heute. 2006;  19 139-143
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Kulling D, Fantin A C, Biro P. et al . Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ng J M, Kong C F, Nyam D. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 8-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Sauerbruch T, Scheurlen C. Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselerkrankungen für die Durchführung endoskopischer Untersuchungen. Stuttgart; Demeter 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 50 American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 317-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Froehlich F, Harris J K, Wietliesbach V. et al . Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE).  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 461-469
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Vargo J J, Zuccaro Jr G, Dumot J AA. et al . Automated graphic assessment of respiratory activity is superior to pulse oximetry and visual assessment for the detection of early respiratory depression during therapeutic upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 826-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Wehrmann T, Grotkamp J, Stergiou N. et al . Electroencephalogram monitoring facilitates sedation with propofol for routine ERCP: a randomized, controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 817-824
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Kortilla K. Recovery after intravenous sedation. A comparison of clinical and paper and pencil tests used in assessing late effects of diazepam.  Anaesthesia. 1976;  31 724-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Willey J, Vargo J J, Connor J T. et al . Quantitative assessment of psychomotor recovery after sedation and analgesia for outpatient EGD.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 810-816
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Riphaus A, Gstettenbauer T, Frenz M B. et al . Quality of psychomotor recovery after propofol sedation for routine endoscopy: a randomized and controlled study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 677-683
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Ogg T W. An assessment of postoperative outpatient cases.  Br Med J. 1972;  4 573-576
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Andrea Riphaus

Medizinische Klinik I, Krankenhaus Siloah, Klinikum Region Hannover

Roesebeckstraße15
30449 Hannover

Email: ARiphaus@web.de

      >