J Reconstr Microsurg 1998; 14(6): 365-368
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1000192
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

© 1998 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Second Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Ayman Abdel-Wahab Amin, Bonnie J. Baldwin, Ali Gürlek, Michael J. Miller, Steven S. Kroll, Gregory P. Reece, Gregory R.D. Evans, Geoffrey R. Robb, Mark A. Schusterman
  • Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Further Information

Publication History

Accepted for publication 1998

Publication Date:
08 March 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade, free-tissue transfer has greatly improved the quality of oncology-related head and neck reconstruction. As this technique has developed, second free flaps have been performed for aesthetic improvement of the reconstructed site. This study evaluated the indications for and the success of second free flaps. Medical files for patients who underwent second free flaps for head and neck reconstruction at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, from May 1, 1988 to November 30, 1996, were reviewed. The flaps were classified as being either immediate (done within 72 hr) or delayed (done within 2 years) reconstructions. Indications, risk factors, recipient vessels, outcome, and complications were analyzed.

Of the 28 patients included in this study, 12 had immediate (nine as salvage after primary free flap failure, and three for reconstruction of a soft-tissue defect), and 16 had delayed second free flaps (two for reconstruction of a defect resulting from excision of recurrent tumors, and 14 for aesthetic improvement). Reconstruction sites included the oral cavity in 18 patients; the midface in six; the skull base in two; and the scalp in two. The success rate for the second free flaps was 96 percent. Five patients had significant wound complications. In a substantial number of cases, identical recipient vessels were used for both the first and second free flaps.

The authors conclude that second free flaps can play an important role in salvaging or improving head and neck reconstruction in selected patients. In many cases, the same recipient vessels can be used for both the first and second flaps.

    >