Extra-Amniotic Saline Infusion Increases Cesarean Risk versus Other Induction Methods and Spontaneous Labor

ABSTRACT

Extra-amniotic saline infusion (EASI) via a Foley catheter has been thought to be comparable in efficacy to other induction and cervical ripening methods. This study examines the risk of cesarean delivery associated with EASI compared with spontaneous labor and other methods of cervical ripening. A retrospective cohort study based upon deliveries at Bellevue Hospital Center from August 2000 to December 2002 was conducted. Three groups were identified: EASI, other methods of induction such as prostaglandins and oxytocin administration, and spontaneous labor. Pairwise comparisons were performed using analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analysis to control for confounding variables. There were 625 charts evaluated: including 171 with EASI, 190 with other induction methods, and 264 with spontaneous labor. The rates of cesarean section were 33.9%, 17.9%, and 7.2%, respectively. When compared with spontaneous labor, there was a higher risk of cesarean delivery for subjects induced with other methods (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 4.5; p < 0.001), and for those induced with EASI (adjusted OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 3.1 to 9.9; p < 0.001). When EASI was compared with other methods of induction, the risk of cesarean delivery was still increased (adjusted OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.8; p = 0.001). EASI is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous labor and other methods of cervical ripening.

KEYWORDS

Labor induction - cervical ripening - pregnancy - cesarean delivery

REFERENCES

• 1 Halbrecht I, Blum M. Induction of mid-trimester abortion by means of extra-amniotic infusion of an isotonic saline solution combined with intravenous oxytocin drip infusion.  Contraception. 1974;  10 637-643
• 2 Buccellato C A, Stika C S, Frederiksen M C. A randomized trial of misoprostol versus extra-amniotic sodium chloride infusion with oxytocin for induction of labor.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  182 1039-1044
• 3 Vengalil S R, Guinn D A, Olabi N F, Burd L I, Owen J. A randomized trial of misoprostol and extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction.  Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  91(5 pt 1) 774-779
• 4 Lin A, Kupferminc M, Dooley S L. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion versus laminaria for cervical ripening.  Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  86(4 pt 1) 545-549
• 5 Rouben D, Arias F. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices.  Obstet Gynecol. 1993;  82 290-294
• 6 Guinn D A, Goepfert A R, Christine M, Owen J, Hauth J C. Extra-amniotic saline, laminaria, or prostaglandin E(2) gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial.  Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  96 106-112
• 7 Levey K A, MacKenzie A P, Stephenson C, Bercik R, Kuczynski E, Funai E F. Increased rates of chorioamnionitis with extra-amniotic saline infusion method of labor induction.  Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  103 724-728
• 8 Guinn D A, Davies J K, Jones R O, Sullivan L, Wolf D. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  191 225-229
• 9 Heffner L J, Elkin E, Fretts R C. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates.  Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  102 287-293