Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2005; 222(7): 533-551
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858427
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Visusrehabilitation bei schwersten Veränderungen der Augenoberfläche

Clinical Management of Severe Ocular Surface DiseaseJ. Stoiber1 , G. Grabner1
  • 1Universitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde und Optometrie an der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität Salzburg (Vorstand: Prim. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Günther Grabner)
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen: 27.12.2004

Angenommen: 25.1.2005

Publication Date:
21 July 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Schwere Erkrankungen der Augenoberfläche, wie Stevens-Johnson-Syndrom, okuläres Schleimhautpemphigoid oder schwere Verätzungen oder Verbrennungen, können aufgrund einer irreversiblen Schädigung des Hornhaut-Stammzellpools zu einer nachhaltigen Visusbeeinträchtigung, in schweren Fällen mitunter auch zur Erblindung, führen. Ist nach einer Verätzung nur ein Auge betroffen, hat sich die autologe Limbustransplantation vom gesunden kontralateralen Auge bewährt. Beidseitig betroffene Patienten können von einer homologen Transplantation von Limbusgewebe eines Spenders profitieren, allerdings ist in diesen Fällen eine Langzeitimmunsuppression erforderlich und die Prognose im Vergleich zu den autologen Verfahren deutlich schlechter. Die Transplantation von Amnionmembran hat sich in den letzten Jahren als zusätzliches Hilfsmittel zur Oberflächenrekonstruktion etabliert. Im Falle eines wiederholten Transplantatversagens nach Keratoplastik kann seit kurzem die AlphaCor, eine „künstliche Hornhaut” aus flexiblem Acrylat, zur Visusverbesserung eingesetzt werden. Im Falle von extrem trockenen Oberflächenverhältnissen und bei vernarbenden oder chronisch-entzündlichen Erkrankungen kann als Ultima Ratio oftmals nur noch die Implantation einer Keratoprothese mit rigider Optik eine visuelle Rehabilitation ermöglichen. Hierbei hat sich die Osteo-Odonto-Keratoprothese nach Strampelli als ein Verfahren mit guten Langzeiterfolgen erwiesen. Ein eigener Zahn samt umgebenden Kieferknochen dient als „biologischer” Halteapparat (Haptik) für einen optischen Zylinder aus PMMA. Sind keine eigenen Zähne mehr vorhanden, kann alternativ die Implantation einer KPro mit Dacron-Haptik (Pintucci-KPro) oder einer Haptik bestehend aus autologem Tibiaknochen (Temprano-KPro) versucht werden.

Abstract

Severe ocular surface diseases, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid or severe ocular burns may result in a significant loss of corneal stem cells, eventually leading to vision impairment or even corneal blindness. In case of unilateral involvement, limbal autografting, by means of transplanting limbal stem cells from the healthy fellow eye, has proved to be an effective procedure for restoring the integrity of the ocular surface. Limbal allografts may be performed in patients with bilateral disease, however, systemic immunosuppression is mandatory in these cases, with a long-term outcome that is frequently reduced compared to limbal autografts due to acute or chronic graft rejection. In recent years, amniotic membrane transplantation has been successfully employed as an additional tool in ocular surface reconstruction. The AlphaCor synthetic cornea, which is made of flexible acrylic may be considered as an alternative in patients with repeated corneal graft failures. Both limbal transplantation and the AlphaCor have been shown to be effective in eyes with an adequate tear film, but are most likely to fail in severe dry eyes or in patients with cicatrising diseases. Such conditions are the domain of keratoprostheses (KPros) with rigid optics, which certainly can be considered as the ‘last resort’ to restore vision in patients with profound corneal blindness not amenable to conventional corneal and limbal grafting. The osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis according to Strampelli and modified by Falcinelli makes use of a “biological” support consisting of a longitudinal section of one of the patient’s teeth that is also supported by the surrounding alveolar bone tissue. Compared to other devices favourable long-term results have been reported. In patients lacking any usable teeth, implantation of a keratoprosthesis with haptics made of Dacron (Pintucci-KPro) or tibial bone (Temprano-KPro) might be considered.

Schlüsselwörter

Keratoprothese - Limbustransplantation - Limbusinsuffizienz - Verätzung - Keratoplastik

Key words

Keratoprosthesis - limbal transplantation - limbal deficiency - ocular burn - keratoplasty

Literatur

  • 1 Alvarez de Toledo J, Barraquer R I, Tempranp J. et al . Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. A 30 years retrospective study.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 1999;  28 95-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Anderson D F, Ellies P, Pires R TF. et al . Amniotic membrane transplantation for partial limbal stem cell deficiency.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;  85 567-575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ballen P H. Mucosal membrane grafts in chemical (lye) burns.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1963;  55 302-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Barber J C. Keratoprostheses: past and present.  Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1988;  28 103-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bodenmüller M, Goldblum D, Früh B E. Retrospektive Analyse tief lamellärer Keratoplastiken.  Klin Mbl Augenheilkd. 2004;  221 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Caiazza S, Falcinelli G, Pintucci S. Exceptional case of bone resorption in osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. A scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis study.  Cornea. 1990;  9 23-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Caiazza S, Fanizza C, Mazziotti I. et al . Light and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the Dacron felt as the haptic part of an improved keratoprosthesis. An in vitro and in vivo study.  Clinical Materials. 1988;  3 33-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Caiazza S, Pintucci S, Donelli G. Biointegrable keratoprosthesis: performances and recent improvements.  Ital J Ophth. 1993;  7 (1) 13-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Caiazza S, Pintucci S, Pintucci F. et al . The Pintucci’s Dacron tissue keratoprosthesis: scanning electron microscopy aspects of infection related failures in transcutaneous implants in dry eyes.  Inst Barraquer (Barc). 1999;  28 (Suppl) 71-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cardona H. Prosthokeratoplasty.  Cornea. 1983;  2 179-183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Castroviejo R, Cardona H, DeVoe A G. Present status of prosthokeratoplasty.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;  68 613-625
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chirila T V, Morrison D A, Hicks C R. et al . In vitro drug-induced spoliation of a keratoprosthetic hydrogel.  Cornea. 2004;  23 620-629
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chirila T V, Thompson-Wallis D E, Crawford G J. et al . Production of neocollagen by cells invading hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea.  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996;  234 193-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Choi T H, Tseng S C. In vivo and in vitro demonstration of epithelial-induced myofibroblast differentiation of keratocytes and an inhibitory effect by amniotic membrane.  Cornea. 2001;  20 197-204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Choyce D P. The Choyce 2-piece perforating keratoprosthesis: 107 cases, 1967 - 1976.  Ophthalmic Surg. 1977;  8 117-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Crawford G J, Chirila T V, Vijayasekaran S. et al . Preliminary evaluation of a hydrogel core-and-skirt keratoprosthesis in the rabbit cornea.  J Refract Surg. 1996;  12 525-529
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Crawford G J, Constable I J, Chirila T V. et al . Tissue interaction with hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea.  Cornea. 1993;  12 348-357
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Crawford G J, Hicks C R, Lou X. et al . The Chirila Keratoprosthesis: phase I human clinical trial.  Ophthalmology. 2002;  109 883-889
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Crosdale C R, Schwartz G S, Malling J V. et al . Keratolimbal allograft: recommendation for tissue procurement and preparation by eye banks, and standard technique.  Cornea. 1999;  18 52-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Davanger M, Evensen A. Role of the pericorneal peripapillary structure in the renewal of corneal epithelium.  Nature. 1971;  229 560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Daya S M, Bell R WD, Habib N E. et al . Clinical and pathologic findings in human keratolimbal allograft rejection.  Cornea. 2000;  19 443-450
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Daya S M, Ilari L. Living related conjunctival limbal allograft for the treatment of stem cell deficiency.  Ophthalmology. 2001;  108 126-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Dimmer F. Zwei Fälle von Celluloidplatten der Hornhaut.  Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1891;  29 104-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dohlman C H, Abad J C, Dudenhoefer E J. et al .Keratoprosthesis. Beyond corneal graft failure. Spaeth G Ophthalmic surgery - principles and practice Philadelphia; Elsevier Science 2002: 199-207
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Dohlman C H, Doane M G. Some factors influencing outcome after keratoprosthesis surgery.  Cornea. 1994;  13 214-218
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dohlman C H, Dudenhofer E, Khan B F. et al . Protection of the ocular surface after keratoprosthesis surgery. The role of soft contact lenses.  CLAO Journal. 2002;  28 72-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dohlman C H, Schneider H, Doane M. Prosthokeratoplasty.  Am J Ophthalmology. 1974;  77 694-700
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dohlman C H, Waller S G. The Dohlman keratoprosthesis. Brightbill F Corneal surgery Mosby-Year Book 1999: 541-549
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Dohlman C H. Postoperative regimen and repair of complications after keratoprosthesis surgery.  Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;  9 198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Dua H S, Azuara-Blanco A. Allo-limbal transplantation in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;  83 414-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dua H S, Azuara-Blanco A. Autologous limbal transplantation in patients with unilateral corneal stem cell deficiency.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;  84 273-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Dua H S. Sequential sequential conjunctival epitheliectomy (SSCE). Holland EJ, Mannis MJ Ocular surface disease. Medical and surgical management New York; Springer 2002: 168-174
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Duncker G I, Krumeich J, Wilhelm F. et al . Lamellierende Keratoplastik - neue Konzepte.  Klin Mbl Augenheilkd. 2004;  221 14-23
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Falcinelli G C, Barogi G, Caselli M. et al . Personal changes and innovations in Strampelli’s osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 1999;  28 (Suppl) 47-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Falcinelli G C, Barogi G, Taloni M. et al . Osteoodontokeratoprosthesis: present experience and future prospects.  Refr Corneal Surg. 1993;  9 193-194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Falcinelli G C, Taloni M, Colliardo P. et al . Modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis for treatment of corneal blindness: long-term anatomic and functional outcome in 181 cases.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 2002;  31 129-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Fitton J H, Ziegelaar B W, Hicks C R. et al . Assessment of anticollagenase treatments after insertion of a keratoprosthetic material in the rabbit cornea.  Cornea. 1998;  17 108-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Frucht-Pery J, Siganos C S, Solomon A. et al . Limbal cell autograft transplantation for severe ocular surface disorders.  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;  236 582-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Girard L J. Keratoprosthesis.  Cornea. 1983;  2 207-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Gomes J A, dos Santos M S, Cunha M C. et al . Amniotic membrane transplantation for partial and total limbal stem cell deficiency secondary to chemical burn.  Ophthalmology. 2003;  110 466-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Gomes J AP, Santos M S, Ventura A S. et al . Amniotic membrane with living related corneal limbal/conjunctival allograft for ocular surface reconstruction in Stevens-Johnson syndrome.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;  121 1369-1374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Grabner G, Falcinelli G C. Osteo-Odonto-Keratoprothese nach Strampelli. Indikationen, Methode, Komplikationen und Ergebnisse. Brewitt H, Zierhut M Trockenes Auge: Anatomie, Physiologie, Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik, Therapie Heidelberg; Kaden 2001: 191-198
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Grabner G, Hitzl W, Stoiber J. et al . The assessment of „long-term” success in keratoprosthesis: can the „Visual Acuity by Time Index (VATI)” give more comparable results? A proposal for a method to compare „medium-to long-term” outcome as demonstrated by the Salzburg series of osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP).  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 2001;  30 55-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Grüterich M, Espana E M, Touhami A. et al . Phenotypic study of a case with successful transplantation of ex vivo expanded human limbal epithelium for unilateral total limbal stem cell deficiency.  Ophthalmology. 2002;  109 1547-1552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Grüterich M, Espana E M, Tseng S CG. Ex vivo expansion of limbal epithelial stem cells: amniotic membrane serving as a stem cell niche.  Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;  48 631-646
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Hao Y, Ma D HK, Hwang D G. et al . Identification of antiangiogenic and anti-inflammatory proteins in human amniotic membrane.  Cornea. 2000;  19 348-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Henderson R M, Coster D J, Williams K A. The long term outcome of limbal allografts: the search for surviving cells.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;  85 604-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Heusser. Die Einheilung der Cornea arteficialis.  Österr Zeitschr Prakt Heilk. 1860;  26 424
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Hicks C, Crawford G, Chirila T. et al . Development and clinical assessment of an artificial cornea.  Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;  19 149-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Hicks C R, Chirila T V, Clayton A B. et al . Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;  82 18-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Hicks C R, Chirila T V, Werner L. et al . Deposits in artificial corneas: risk factors and prevention.  Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2004;  32 185-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hicks C R, Crawford G J, Tan D T. et al . AlphaCor cases: comparative outcomes.  Cornea. 2003;  22 583-590
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Hicks C R, Crawford G J, Tan D T. et al . Outcomes of implantation of an artificial cornea, AlphaCor: effects of prior ocular herpes simplex infection.  Cornea. 2002;  21 685-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Hicks C R, Crawford G J. Melting after keratoprosthesis implantation: the effects of medroxyprogesterone.  Cornea. 2003;  22 497-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Hicks C R, Fitton J H, Chirila T V. et al . Keratoprostheses: advancing toward a true artificial cornea.  Surv Ophthalmol. 1997;  42 175-189
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Hicks C R, Vijayasekaran S, Chirila T V. et al . Implantation of PHEMA keratoprostheses after alkali burns in rabbit eyes.  Cornea. 1998;  17 301-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Hille K, Landau H, Ruprecht K W. Die Osteo-Odonto-Keratoprothese - Ein Resümee nach sechs Jahren operativer Erfahrung.  Ophthalmologe. 2002;  99 90-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Hille K, Landau H, Ruprecht K W. Improvement of the Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis according to Strampelli: influence of diameter of PMMA cylinder on visual filed.  Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;  237 308-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Hille K, Landau H, Ruprecht K W. The Ahmed valve in secondary glaucoma in osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 2001;  30 139-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Hille K, Landau H, Ruprecht K W. The osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis- resume of six years operative experience.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 2002;  31 136-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Hille K, Ruprecht K W. Die Ahmed Glaucoma Valve - ein neues Implantat zur operativen Drucksenkung.  Ophthalmologe. 1999;  96 653-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Hille K. Keratoprothesen. Historischer Überblick, Materialien und Stand der gegenwärtigen Forschung.  Ophthalmologe. 2002;  99 513-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Hitzl W, Grabner G. Application of the Monte Carlo method for the assessment of long-term success in keratoprosthesis surgery.  J Theor Med. 2002;  4 183-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Holland E J. Epithelial transplantation for management of severe ocular surface disease.  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;  19 677-743
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Hull C C, Liu C S, Sciscio A. et al . Optical cylinder designs to increase the field of vision in the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis.  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;  238 1002-1008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Ilari L, Daya S M. Long-term outcomes of keratolimbal allograft for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders.  Ophthalmology. 2002;  109 1278-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Kenyon K R, Tseng S CG. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders.  Ophthalmology. 1989;  96 709-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Kruse F E, Reinhard T. Die Limbustransplantation zur Rekonstruktion der Augenoberfläche.  Ophthalmologe. 2001;  98 818-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Kruse F E. Die Stammzellen des Limbus und ihre Bedeutung für die Regeneration der Hornhautoberfläche.  Ophthalmologe. 1996;  93 633-643
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Kwitko S, Marinho D, Barcaro S. et al . Allograft conjunctival transplantation for bilateral ocular surface disorders.  Ophthalmology. 1995;  102 1020-1025
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Lacombe E. All PMMA-CQ retroprostheic fixation KPro at 10 years.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 2001;  30 47-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Lacombe. Kératoprosthesis à fixation postérieure.  J F Ophthalmol. 1991;  14 81-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Lang G K. Lamellierende Keratoplastik - neue Konzepte.  Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004;  221 13
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Liu C, Pagliarini S. Independent survey of long term results of the Falcinelli osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP).  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 1999;  28 91-93
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Lund O E. Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der optischen Keratoprothese. Ein klinischer und histopathologischer Bericht.  Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1982;  180 3-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Marchi V, Ricci R, Pecorella I. et al . Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Decription of surgical technique with results in 85 patients.  Cornea. 1994;  13 125-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Meller D, Kruse F. Ex-vivo-Expansion kornealer Stammzellen. Experimentelle Grundlagen und erste klinische Ergebnisse.  Ophthalmologe. 2001;  98 811-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Meller D, Pires R T, Tseng S C. Ex vivo preservation and expansion of human limbal epithelial stem cells on amniotic membrane cultures.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;  86 463-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Morgan S, Murray A. Limbal autotransplantation in the acute and chronic phases of severe chemical injuries.  Eye. 1996;  10 349-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Nakamura T, Inatomi T, Sotozono C. et al . Transplantation of cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells in patients with severe ocular surface disorders.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;  88 1280-1284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y. et al . Corneal reconstruction with tissue-emgineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  351 1187-1196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Nouri M, Terada H, Alfonso E C. et al . Endophthalmitis after keratoprosthesis: Incidence, bacterial causes and risk factors.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;  119 484-489
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Parel J M. 200 years of KPro: Pellier de Quengsy and the artificial cornea.  A Inst Barraquer (Barc). 1999;  28 33-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 de Pellier Quengsy G. Precis ou cours d’operations sur la chirurgie des yeux. Paris; Didot & Mequignon 1789 - 90 1: 94-103
    Google Scholar
  • 85 Penn I. Occurrence of cancers in immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients.  Clin Transpl. 1998;  147-158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Penn I. Post-transplant malignancy: the role of immunosuppression.  Drug Saf. 2000;  23 101-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Pintucci S, Perilli R, Formisano G. et al . Influence of dacron tissue thickness on the performance of the Pintucci biointegrable keratoprosthesis: an in vitro and in vivo study.  Cornea. 2001;  20 (6) 647-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Caiazza S. et al . The Dacron felt colonizable keratoprosthesis: after 15 years.  Eur J Ophthalmol. 1996;  6 (2) 125-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Caiazza S. The Dacron felt colonizable keratoprosthesis.  Refr Corneal Surg. 1993;  9 196-197
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Cecconi M. et al . New Dacron tissue colonisable keratoprosthesis: clinical experience.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;  79 (9) 825-829
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Cecconi M. et al . The Pintucci Dacron tissue KP: long term results, postoperative care and revisions in dry eyes and in eyes with tear secretion.  An Inst Barraquer. 1999;  28 109-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Cecconi M. et al . The Pintucci’s Dacron tissue KP: histological and ultrastructural aspects of the biointegration of the supporting element.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 1999;  28 (Suppl) 161-165
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Cecconi M. et al . The Pinucci’s Dacron tissue KP: how we improved the technique of implanting the KP in dry eyes and in eyes with sufficient tear secretion.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 1999;  28 (Suppl) 51-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Sarra A. PMMA/Dacron biointegrated keratoprosthesis. 19 years of experience.  Inst Barraquer (Barc). 2001;  30 (Suppl) 97-99
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Pollack F M. Clinical results with a ceramic keratoprosthesis.  Cornea. 1983;  2 185-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Puangsricharern V, Tseng S CG. Cytologic evidence of corneal diseases with limbal stem cell deficiency.  Ophthalmology. 1995;  102 1476-1485
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Rama P, Bonini S, Lambiase A. et al . Autologous fibrin-cultured limbal stem cells permanently restore the corneal surface of patients with total limbal stem cell deficency.  Transplantation. 2001;  72 1478-1485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Rao S K, Rajagopal R, Sitalakshmi G. et al . Limbal allografting from related live donors for corneal surface reconstruction.  Ophthalmology. 1999;  106 822-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Reinhard T, Kontopoulos T, Wernet P. et al . Langzeitergebnisse der homologen perforierenden Limbokeratoplastik bei totaler Limbusstammzellinsuffizienz nach Verätzungen/Verbrennungen.  Ophthalmologe. 2004;  101 682-687
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Reinhard T, Spelsberg H, Henke L. et al . Long-term resultsof allogeneic penetrating limbo-keratoplasty in total limbal stem cell deficiency.  Ophthalmology. 2004;  111 775-782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Ricci R, Pecorella I, Ciardi A. et al . Strampelli’s osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Clinical and histological long-term features of three prostheses.  Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;  76 232-234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Salzer F. Über den weiteren Verlauf des in meiner Arbeit über den künstlichen Hornhaut-Ersatz mitgeteilten Falles von Cornea arteficialis sowie des von Schröderschen Falles.  Z Augenheilkd. 1900;  3 504-509
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Samson C M, Nduaguba C, Baltatzis S. et al . Limbal stem cell transplantation in chronic inflammatory eye disease.  Ophthalmology. 2002;  109 862-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Schermer A, Galvin S, Sun T T. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64 K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells.  J Cell Biol. 1986;  103 49-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Schwab I. Cultured corneal epithelia for ocular surface disease.  Tr Am Ophth Soc. 1999;  97 891-986
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Schwab I R, Reyes M, Isseroff R R. Successful transplantation of bioingeneered tissue replacements in patients with ocular surface disease.  Cornea. 2000;  19 421-426
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Shimazaki J, Maruyama F, Shimmura S. et al . Immunologic rejection of the central graft after limbal allograft transplantation combined with penetrating keratoplasty.  Cornea. 2001;  20 149-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Ohashi Y. et al . Antiinflammatory effects of amniotic membrane transplantation in ocular surface disorders.  Cornea. 2001;  20 408-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Solomon A, Ellies P, Anderson D F. et al . Long-term outcome of keratolimbal allograft with or without penetrating keratoplasty for total limbal stem cell deficiency.  Ophthalmology. 2002;  109 1159-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Stenevi U, Hanson C, Claesson M. et al . Survival of transplanted human corneal stem cells. Case report.  Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;  80 105-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Stoiber J, Csaky D, Schedle A. et al . Histopathological findings in explanted osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP).  Cornea. 2002;  21 400-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Stoiber J, Fernandez V, Kaminski S. et al . Biological response to a SupraDescemetic Synthetic Cornea (sDSC) in rabbits.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;  122 1850-1855
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Stoiber J, Fernandez V, Kaminski S. et al . Entwicklung einer neuen Implantationstechnik zur supraDescemetalen Implantation einer lamellären Keratoprothese.  Spektrum Augenheilkd. 2004;  18 138-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Stoiber J, Fernandez V, Lamar P. et al . Biological response to a SupraDescemetic Synthetic Cornea (sDSC) in rabbits.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 2003;  32 237-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Stoiber J, Fernandez V, Lamar P. et al . Biocompatibility of a non-penetrating synthetic cornea in vascularized rabbit corneas.  Cornea. 2005;  24 467-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Stoiber J, Fernandez V, Lamar P. et al . Supradescemetic Synthetic Cornea (sDSC): Ex-Vivo Feasibility Study in Human Eye Bank. Eyes.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 2003;  32 252-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Stoiber J, Fernandez V, Lamar P. et al . Biocompatibility of a non-penetrating keratoprosthesis (supraDescemetic synthetic cornea, sDSC) in vascularized rabbit corneas.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;  45 ARVO Meeting Abstract 2928
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Stoiber J, Forstner R, Csaky D. et al . Evaluation of bone reduction of the haptic lamina on osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis by three-dimensional computerized tomography.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 2002;  31 181-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Stoiber J, Forstner R, Csaky D, Ruckhofer J, Falcinelli G C, Grabner G. Evaluation of bone reduction of the haptic lamina in osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis by computerized topography.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;  42 30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Stoiber J, Forstner R, Csáky D. et al . Evaluation of Bone Reduction In Osteo-Odonto-Keratoprosthesis (OOKP) by Three-Dimensional Computerized Tomography.  Cornea. 2003;  22 126-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Stoiber J, Muss W H, Pohla-Gubo G. et al . Histopathology of human corneas after amniotic membrane and limbal stem cell transplantation for severe chemical burn.  Cornea. 2002;  21 482-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Stoiber J, Ruckhofer J, Grabner G. AlphaCor - Erste Erfahrungen mit einer flexiblen Keratoprothese.  Spektrum Augenheilkd. 2004;  18 98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Stoiber J, Ruckhofer J, Muss W. et al . Amnion-Limbus-Transplantation zur Oberflächenrekonstruktion nach schwerer Verätzung und Verbrennung.  Ophthalmologe. 2002;  99 839-848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Strampelli B, Marchi V. Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis.  Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul. 1970;  96 1-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Strampelli B, Valvo A. Durability of ocular prosthesis. Late results of a personal technique with 18 years experience.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;  62 643-648
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Strampelli B. Keratoprosthesis with osteodental tissue.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1963;  89 1029-1039
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Strampelli B. Osteo-odontocheratoprotesi.  Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul. 1963;  89 1039-1044
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Sundmacher R, Reinhard T, Althaus C. Homologe zentrale Limbokeratoplastik bei Limbusstammzellschäden.  Ophthalmologe. 1997;  94 897-901
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 129 Sundmacher R, Reinhard T. Central corneolimbal transplantation under systemic Ciclosporin A cover for severe limbal stem cell deficeiency.  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996;  234 122-125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 130 Taloni M, Manni T, Micozzi I. et al . Computerized tomography study of the osteo-odonto-acrylic lamina.  An Inst Barraquer (Barc). 1999;  28 145-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Tan D TH, Ficker L A, Buckley R J. Limbal transplantation.  Ophthalmology. 1996;  103 29-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Temprano J. Keratoprosthesis with tibial autograft.  Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;  9 192-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Temprano J A. Queratoprotesis. Temprano JA Queratoplatias y queratoprotesis Barcelona; Espaxs S.A. Publicaciones Medicas 1991: 265-336
    Google Scholar
  • 134 Tsai R JF, Li L M, Chen J K. Reconstruction of damaged corneas by transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial cells.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 86-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Tsai R JF, Tseng S CG. Human allograft limbal transplantation for corneal surface reconstruction.  Cornea. 1994;  13 389-400
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Tseng S CG, Meller D, Pires R TF. et al . Corneal surface reconstruction by limbal epithelial cells ex vivo expanded on amniotic membrane.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;  41 S756
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Tseng S CG, Prabhasawat P, Barton K. et al . Amniotic membrane transplantation with or without limbal allografts for corneal surface reconstruction in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;  116 431-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Tseng S CG. Concept and application of limbal stem cells.  Eye. 1989;  3 141-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Tsubota K, Satake Y, Kaido M. et al . Treatment of severe ocular-surface disorders with corneal epithelial stem-cell transplantation.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  340 1697-1703
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 140 Tsubota K, Toda I, Saito H. et al . Reconstruction of the corneal epithelium by limbal allograft transplantation for severe ocular surface disorders.  Ophthalmology. 1995;  102 1486-1496
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 Vijayasekaran S, Hicks C R, Chirila T V. et al . Histologic evaluation during healing of hydrogel core-and-skirt keratoprostheses in the rabbit eye.  Cornea. 1997;  16 352-359
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 142 Völker-Dieben H JM. A five-year follow-up of 22 eyes with a champagne cork keratoprosthesis.  Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;  9 190-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Von Hippel A. Über die operative Behandlung totaler stationärer Hornhauttrübungen.  Albrecht v Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1887;  23 79-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 144 Whitcher J P, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay M P. Corneal blindness: a global perspective.  Bulletin of the World Health Organisation. 2001;  79 214-221
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 145 Williams K A, Muehlberg S M, Bartlett C M. et al .The Australian Corneal Graft Registry 1999 Report. Adelaide; Snap Printing 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 146 Worst J GF. Twenty-three years of keratoprosthesis research: present state of art.  Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;  9 188-189
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 147 Yaghouti F, Nouri M, Abad J C. et al . Keratoprosthesis: preoperative prognostic categories.  Cornea. 2001;  20 19-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 148 Yakimenko S. Results of a PMMA/Titanium keratoprosthesis in 502 eyes.  Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;  9 197-198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 149 Yao Y F, Zhang B, Zhou P. et al . Autologous limbal grafting combined with deep lamellar keratoplasty in unilateral eye with severe chemical or thermal burn at late stage.  Ophthalmology. 2002;  109 2011-2017
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 150 Zirm A. Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik.  Albrecht v Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1906;  64 580-593
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Josef Stoiber

Universitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde und Optometrie an der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität

Müllner Hauptstraße 48

5020 Salzburg

Österreich

Phone: ++ 43/6 62/44 82-37 02

Fax: ++ 43/6 62/44 82-37 03

Email: j.stoiber@salk.at

      >