Chemistry of Allylsulfones: A New Preparation of N-Diphenylmethylene-2-Vinyl-Substituted Cyclopropylamines

David Díez; P. García; P. Fernández; Isidro S. Marcos; N. M. Garrido; P. Basabe; Howard B. Broughton; Julio G. Urones

doi:10.1055/s-2004-835663

Subscribe to RSS

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml

Share / Bookmark

Facebook X Linkedin Weibo

Download PDF

Synlett 2005(1): 158-160
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-835663

LETTER

Chemistry of Allylsulfones: A New Preparation of N-Diphenylmethylene-2-Vinyl-Substituted Cyclopropylamines

David Díez*^a, P. García^a, P. Fernández^a, Isidro S. Marcos^a, N. M. Garrido^a, P. Basabe^a, Howard B. Broughton^b, Julio G. Urones^a
^a Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Salamanca, Plaza de los Caídos 1-5, 37008 Salamanca, Spain
^b Lilly S.A., Avda. de la Industria 30, 28108 Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain
Fax: +34(923)294574; e-Mail: ddm@usal.es;

Further Information

Publication History

Received 30 July 2004
Publication Date:
29 November 2004 (online)

Abstract
Full Text
References

Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

A new methodology for the synthesis of N-diphenylmethylene-2-vinyl-substituted cyclopropylamines, starting from the allylsulfone 11, is described. The starting material 11 can be obtained in both enantiomeric forms. The stereoselectivity of the cyclopropane formation has been studied by molecular modeling

Key words

cyclopropylamines - vinylsulfones - allylsulfones - cyclopropanes - Garner’s aldehyde

References

1a Asai A, Mizukami T, Yamashita Y, Akinaga S, Ikeda S, and Kanda Y. inventors; Eur. Patent 1166781. ; Chem. Abstr. 2002, 133, 120677
1b Asai A. Hasegawa A. Ochiai K. Yamashita Y. Mizukami T. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53: 81

Google Scholar
1c For synthesis of this compound and the cyclopropylamine amino acid, see also: Brandl M. Kozhushkov SI. Loscha K. Kokoreva OV. Yufit DS. Howard JAK. de Meijere A. Synlett 2000, 1741

Google Scholar
1d Larionov OV. Savel’eva TF. Kochetkov KA. Ikonnokov NS. Kozhushkov SI. Yufit DS. Howard JAK. Khrustalev VN. Belokon YN. de Meijere A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 869

Google Scholar
1e Armstrong A. Scutt JN. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 2331

Google Scholar
1f Armstrong A. Scutt JN. Chem. Commun. 2004, 510

Google Scholar
1g Larionov OV. Kozhushkov SI. Brandl M. de Meijere A. Mendeleev Commun. 2003, 5: 199

Google Scholar
2a Csuk R. von Schloz Y. Tetrahedron 1994, 50: 10431

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
2b De Esch IJP. Volinga RC. Goubitz K. Schenk H. Appelber U. Hacksell U. Lemstra S. Zuiderveld OP. Hoffmann M. Leurs R. Menge WMPB. Timmerman H. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42: 1115

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
2c Vangveravong S. Kanthasamy A. Lucaites VL. Nelson DL. Nichols DE. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41: 4995

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
3 Gnad F. Poleschak M. Reiser O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 4277

Crossref Google Scholar
4a Chaplinski V. de Meijere A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35: 413

Google Scholar
4b Williams CM. Chaplinski V. Schreiner PR. de Meijere A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39: 7695

Google Scholar
4c de Meijere A. Kozhushkov SI. Savchnko AI. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689: 2033

Google Scholar
4d de Meijere A. Williams CM. Kourdioukov A. Sviridov SV. Chaplinski V. Kordes M. Savchenko AI. Stratmann C. Noltemeyer M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2002, 8: 3789

Google Scholar
4e Wiedemann S. Marek I. de Meijere A. Synlett 2002, 789

Google Scholar
5 Campos PJ. Soldevilla A. Sampedro D. Rodriguez MA. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 4087

Crossref Google Scholar
6a Diez D. García P. Pacheco MP. Marcos IS. Garrido NM. Basabe P. Urones JG. Synlett 2002, 355

Article in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
6b Diez D. García P. Marcos IS. Garrido NM. Basabe P. Urones JG. Synthesis 2003, 53

Article in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
7 Diez D. García P. Marcos IS. Garrido NM. Basabe P. Urones JG. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 3687

Crossref Google Scholar
8 Bergmeier SC. Tetrahedron 2000, 56: 2561

Crossref Google Scholar
9a Liang X. Andersch J. Bols M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 2136

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
9b Esposito A. Piras PP. Ramazzotti D. Taddei M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 3273

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
9c Azuma H. Tamagaki S. Ogino K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65: 3538

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
10 Díez D. San Feliciano SG. Marcos IS. Basabe P. Garrido NM. Urones JG. Synthesis 2001, 1069

Article in Thieme Connect Google Scholar
11a Priepke H. Brückner R. Harms K. Chem. Ber. 1990, 123: 555

Google Scholar
11b Jurgens AR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 33: 4727

Google Scholar
12 Reissig HU. Chem. Rev. 2002, 103: 1151

Google Scholar
13a O’Donnell MJ. Aldrichimica Acta 2001, 34: 3

Google Scholar
13b Greene TW. Wuts PGM. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis 3rd ed.: John Wiley and Sons; New York: 1999.

Google Scholar
14a Dorizon P. Ollivier J. Salaün J. Synlett 1996, 1071

Crossref Google Scholar
14b Paugam R. Gaucher A. Dorizon P. Olivier J. Salaün J. Tetrahedron 2000, 56: 8495

Crossref Google Scholar
15 Jackson RFW. Moore RJ. Dexter CS. Elliot J. Mowbray CE. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63: 7875

Crossref Google Scholar

16

Data for Compound 19: [α]_D ²⁰ -76.8 (c 1.45, CHCl₃). IR (film): ν_max = 3058, 2928, 1446, 1317, 1145, 1086, 801 cm^-1. ¹H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 1.26 (m, 1 H, 3-Hα), 1.73 (dt, 1 H, J = 8.8, 4.4 Hz, 3-Hβ), 2.20 (m, 1 H, 2-H), 3.11 (ddd, 1 H, J = 4.4, 7.2, 9.2 Hz, 1-H), 6.33 (d, 1 H, J = 15.0 Hz, 2′-H), 6.46 (dd, 1 H, J = 9.2, 14.6 Hz, 1′-H), 7.10-7.61 (m, 13 H, Ar-), 7.84 (m, 2 H, H_ortho, -SO₂Ph). ¹³C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 19.8 (C-3), 26.1 (C-2), 46.3 (C-1), 127.4-129.1 (CH-Ar), 130.0 (C-2′), 133.1 (C_para, -SO₂Ph), 136.3 and 139.4 (C_ipso, -Ph), 141.0 (C_ipso, -SO₂Ph), 148.1 (C-1′), 168.7 (CPh₂). MS: m/z (%) = 388 (30) [MH⁺], 307 (15), 246 (35), 154 (100), 77 (55). HMRS: m/z calcd for C₂₄H₂₂NSO₂: 388.1371; found: 388.1321 [MH⁺].

17

The molecular modeling studies were carried out with Maestro v. 5.1.016 coupled to MacroModel v. 8.1.031, both supplied by Schrodinger, Inc. of Portland, OR, USA. Starting structures were built by sketching and were atom-typed automatically and energy-minimized using up to 5000 iterations of TNCG minimization to default convergence. The conformational search was carried out using the MCMM/Lowmode mixed method, with default settings based upon the automated setup procedure within Maestro. The conformational constraints were added manually and set to 25, 100 or 400 kJ/mol in three separate runs for each of the four models (cis- and trans-cyclopropane, and torsional constraint set to 0 or 180 degrees). The number of trials was set to 100 since at this value all the low-energy conformations were found at least 4 times. Minimizations were all achieved with up to 5000 iterations of TNCG optimization to default convergence, and all structures were successfully converged.