Int J Sports Med 2004; 25(6): 409-414
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815849
Training & Testing

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Modification of the Wingate Anaerobic Power Test for Rowing: Optimization of the Resistance Setting

S. Mandic1 , H. A. Quinney1 , G. J. Bell1
  • 1E424 Van Vliet Center Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Accepted after revision: September 20, 2003

Publication Date:
18 May 2004 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the resistance factor that would elicit the highest peak 5 s and mean 30 s power output (PO) during a maximal 30 s anaerobic power test on a rowing ergometer. Thirty-one rowers (17 male and 14 female) were recruited based on the light-weight (LW) (6 male; age 23 ± 6 yrs and 6 female; age 19 ± 2 yrs) and heavy-weight (HW) (11 male; age 24 ± 4 yrs and 8 female; age 27 ± 8 yrs) rowing categories. Each group completed 5 randomized series of maximal 30 s sprints equivalent to the following forces: 58.9, 63.8, 68.7, 73.7 and 78.6 N for LW males; 83.5, 88.4, 93.4, 98.2 and 103.1 N for HW males; 29.4, 34.3, 39.2, 44.1 and 49.1 N for LW females; and 44.1, 49.1, 54.0, 58.6 and 63.8 N for HW females. The tests were performed on a Gjessing rowing ergometer modified to accommodate greater resistance settings and computer linked to obtain the necessary data. The peak 5 s and mean 30 s PO (W) were determined for each test. A relative load factor (RLF) for determining the amount of resistance to be applied was calculated based on body mass (BM). The RLF settings that elicited the highest peak 5 s PO were 0.109 and 0.102 kg · kg-1 BM for LW and HW male rowers and 0.111 kg · kg-1 BM and 0.076 kg · kg-1 BM for LW and HW female rowers, respectively. The RLF settings for eliciting the highest mean 30 s PO were 0.102 and 0.095 kg · kg-1 BM for LW and HW male rowers and 0.103 kg · kg-1 BM and 0.068 kg · kg-1 BM for LW and HW female rowers, respectively. A 30 second anaerobic test was also performed on a Concept II rowing machine for comparison and it was found to elicit a significantly lower peak 5 s but not 30 s PO in both male and female rowers. Our findings provide RLFs for assessing anaerobic power using a 30 s test in male and female rowers. As well, peak 5 s but not mean 30 s PO is underestimated using the Concept II rowing machine.

References

  • 1 Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity.  Sports Med. 1987;  4 381-394
  • 2 Bell G J, Petersen S R, Quinney H A, Wenger H A. The effect of velocity-specific strength training on peak torque and anaerobic rowing power.  J Sports Sci. 1989;  7 205-214
  • 3 Coggan A R, Costill D L. Biological and technological variability of three anaerobic ergometer tests.  Int J Sports Med. 1984;  5 142-145
  • 4 Dotan R, Bar-Or O. Load optimalization for the Wingate anaerobic test.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1983;  51 409-417
  • 5 Evans J A, Quinney H A. Determination of resistance settings for anaerobic power testing.  Can J Appl Spt Sci. 1981;  6 53-56
  • 6 Gillies E M, Bell G J. The relationship of physical and physiological parameters to 2000 m simulated rowing performance.  Sports Med Training Rehab. 2000;  9 277-288
  • 7 Inbar O, Bar-Or O, Skinner J S. The Wingate Anaerobic Test. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1996
  • 8 Koutedakis Y, Sharp N C. A modified Wingate test for measuring anaerobic work of the upper body in junior rowers.  Brit J Sports Med. 1986;  20 153-156
  • 9 Manning J M, Dooly-Manning C, Perrin D H. Factor analysis of various anaerobic power tests.  J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1988;  28 138-144
  • 10 Patton J F, Murphy M M, Frederick F A. Maximal power outputs during the Wingate anaerobic test.  Int J Sports Med. 1985;  6 82-85
  • 11 Pripstein L P, Rhodes E C, McKenzie D C. Aerobic and anaerobic energy during a 2-km race simulation in female rowers.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1999;  79 491-494
  • 12 Reilly T, Bayley K. The relation between short-term power output and sprint performance of young female swimmers.  J Human Movement Studies. 1988;  14 19-29
  • 13 Secher N H. Physiological and biomechanical aspects of rowing.  Sports Med. 1993;  15 24-42
  • 14 Tharp G D, Newhouse R K, Uffelman L, Thorland W G, Johnson G O. Comparison of sprint and running times with performance on the Wingate anaerobic test.  Res Q. 1985;  56 73-76
  • 15 Vandewalle H, Peres G, Monod H. Standard anaerobic exercise tests.  Sports Med. 1987;  4 268-289

Ph.D. Gordon Bell

Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation · University of Alberta

E424 Van Vliet Center

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H9

Canada

Phone: + 7804922018

Fax: + 78 04 92 23 64

Email: Gordon.bell@ualberta.ca

    >