Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2003; 24(4): 285-300
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815578
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Ethical Issues in Dysphagia: When Patients Refuse Assessment or Treatment

Helen M. Sharp1 , Karen N. Bryant2
  • 1Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, and the Program in Biomedical Ethics and Medical Humanities, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • 2Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 January 2004 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The primary goal of intervention for patients with dysphagia is to restore oral feeding. When patients are unable to achieve adequate nutrition, hydration, or safety with oral feeding, then nonoral approaches are often recommended. Although patients' rights to accept or refuse clinical recommendations are widely recognized, when a patient refuses tube feeding or other recommendations, dysphagia specialists are left with a host of practical questions about their role in caring for the patient. We review the criteria for assessing patients' capacity to make informed choices, approaches to decision making when patients lack capacity, and the roles and responsibilities of clinicians when patients choose high-risk treatment options.

KEYWORDS

Deglutition disorders - enteral nutrition - clinical decision making - advance directives - withholding and withdrawing treatment

REFERENCES

  • 1 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 Pub Law 101-508, §4206, 4751 . 
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford 2001
  • 3 Jonsen A R, Siegler M, Winslade W J. Clinical Ethics, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 1998
  • 4 Lo B. Resolving Ethical Dilemmas: A Guide for Clinicians, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2000
  • 5 Berg J W, Appelbaum P S, Lidz C W, Parker L S. Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. New York: Oxford 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 6 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Roles of Speech-Language Pathologists in Swallowing and Feeding Disorders: Technical Report. Rockville, MD: Author 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Logemann J A. Evaluation and Treatment of Swallowing Disorders.  Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Gauderer M. Twenty years of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: origin and evolution of a concept and its expanded applications.  Gastrointest Endosc . 1999;  50 879-883
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Feinberg M J, Knebl J, Tully J, Segall L. Aspiration in the elderly.  Dysphagia . 1990;  5 61-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Finucane T E, Christmas C, Travis K. Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: a review of the evidence.  JAMA . 1999;  282 1365-1370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Haddad R Y, Thomas D R. Enteral nutrition and enteral tube feeding: review of the evidence.  Clin Geriatric Med . 2002;  18 867-881
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Post S G. Tube feeding and advanced progressive dementia.  Hastings Cent Rep . 2001;  31 36-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Winter S M. Terminal nutrition: framing the debate for the withdrawal of nutritional support in terminally ill patients.  Am J Med . 2000;  109 723-726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kuhlemeier K V, Yates P, Palmer J B. Intra- and interrater variation in the evaluation of videofluorographic swallowing studies.  Dysphagia . 1998;  13 142-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 McCullough G H, Wertz R T, Rosenbek J C, Mills R H, Webb W G, Ross K B. Inter- and intrajudge reliability for videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation measures.  Dysphagia . 2001;  16 110-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Scott A, Perry A, Bench J. A study of interrater reliability when using videofluoroscopy as an assessment of swallowing.  Dysphagia . 1998;  13 223-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Callahan C M. Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older adults in a community setting.  Am J Geriatr Soc . 2000;  48 1048-1054
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rabeneck L, McCullogh L B, Wray N P. Ethically justified, clinically comprehensive guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.  Lancet . 1997;  349 496-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Marik P E. Primary care: aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia.  N Engl J Med . 2001;  344 665-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ciocon J O, Silverstone F A, Graver L M, Foley C J. Tube feedings in elderly patients.  Arch Intern Med . 1998;  148 429-443
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Cogen R, Weinryb J. Aspiration pneumonia in nursing home patients fed via gastrostomy tubes.  Am J Gastroenterol . 1989;  84 1509-1512
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Finucane T E, Bynum J PW. Use of tube feeding to prevent aspiration pneumonia.  Lancet . 1996;  348 1421-1424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mamel J J. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.  Am J Gastroenterol . 1989;  84 703-710
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Olivares L, Segovia A, Revuelta R. Tube feeding and lethal aspiration in neurological patients: a review of 720 autopsy cases.  Stroke . 1974;  5 654-657
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rabeneck L, Wray N P, Petersen N J. Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes.  J Gen Intern Med . 1996;  11 287-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Raha S K, Woodhouse K. The use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 161 consecutive elderly patients.  Age Ageing . 1994;  23 162-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hlatky M A. Patient preferences and clinical guidelines.  JAMA . 1995;  273 1219-1220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital, 105 NE 92 (NY 1914) . 
    Google Scholar
  • 29 American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice.  Pediatrics . 1995;  95 314-317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research Washington, DC: DHEW Publication OS 78-0112 1978
  • 31 Karlawish J HT, Quill T, Meier D E. A consensus-based approach to providing palliative care to patients who lack decision-making capacity.  Ann Intern Med . 1999;  130 835-840
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bouvia v Superior Court, 179 Cal App 3d 1127, 225 Cal Rptr 297 (Ct App Cal 2d 1986) . 
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 US 261 (1990) . 
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Fischer G S, Tulsky J A, Rose M A, Siminoff L A, Arnold R M. Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives.  J Gen Intern Med . 1998;  13 447-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sachs G A, Stern R, Cox D M, Hougham G, Sachs R S. Ethical aspects of dementia research: informed consent and proxy consent.  Clin Res . 1994;  42 403-412
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Tsevat J, Cook E F, Green M L. et al . Health values of the seriously ill: SUPPORT investigators.  Ann Intern Med . 1998;  122 514-520
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bascom P B, Tolle S W. Responding to requests for physician-assisted suicide: “These are uncharted waters for both of us .  . . “ JAMA . 2002;  288 91-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Boyd N F, Sutherland H J, Heasman K Z, Tritchler D L, Cummings B J. Whose utilities for decisions analysis?.  Med Decision Making . 1990;  10 58-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Sharp H M, List M, MacCracken E, Stenson K, Stocking C, Siegler, M. Patients' priorities among treatment effects in head and neck cancer: evaluation of a new assessment tool.  Head Neck . 1999;  21 538-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Stein J. The ethics of advance directives: a rehabilitation perspective.  Am J Med Rehab . 2003;  82 152-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Grisso T, Appelbaum P S. Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: a Guide for Physicians and Other Health Care Professionals.  New York: Oxford; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Lo B. Assessing decision-making capacity.  Law Med Health Care . 1990;  18 193-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Weir R F, Peters C. Affirming the decisions adolescents make about life and death.  Hastings Cent Rep . 1997;  27 29-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Appelbaum P S, Grisso T. Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment.  N Engl J Med . 1988;  319 1635-1638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Sullivan M D, Youngner S J. Depression, competence, and the right to refuse lifesaving medical treatment.  Am J Psychiatry . 1994;  151 971-978
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Tavalaro J, Tayson R. Look Up for Yes.  New York: Kodansha America; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Brady Wagner C L. Clinical ethics in the context of language and cognitive impairment: rights and protections.  Semin Speech Lang . 2003;  24 275-284
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act; 1993.  Available at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/ uniform/vol9.html. Accessed March 1 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Orentlicher D. Advance medical directives.  JAMA . 1990;  263 2365-2367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Lo B, Dornbrand L, Wolf L E, Groman M. The Wendland case: withdrawing life support from incompetent patients who are not terminally ill.  N Engl J Med . 2002;  346 1489-1493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Meier D E, Fuss B R, O'Rourke D, Baskin S A, Lewis M, Morrison R S. Marked improvement in recognition and completion of health care proxies: a randomized control trial of counseling by hospital patient representatives.  Arch Intern Med . 1996;  156 1227-1232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Rubin S M, Strull W M, Fialkow M F, Weiss S J, Lo B. Increasing completion of the durable power of attorney for health care: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA . 1994;  271 209-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Schneiderman L J, Kronick R, Kaplan R M, Anderson J P, Langer R D. Effects of offering advance directives on medical treatments and costs.  Ann Intern Med . 1992;  117 599-606
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Sulmasy D P, Song K Y, Marx E S, Mitchell J M. Strategies to promote the use of advance directives in a residency outpatient practice.  J Gen Intern Med . 1996;  11 657-663
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Morrison R S, Olson E, Mertz, K R, Meier D E. The inaccessibility of advance directives on transfer from ambulatory to acute care settings.  JAMA . 1995;  274 478-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Iowa Code 1999 Supplement, §144A.3, 144A.4 Available at: http://www.legis.state.ia.us/cgi-bin/ IACODE/Code1999 SUPPLEMENT. Accessed August 28, 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Kohut N, Sam M, O'Rourke K, MacFadden D K, Salit I, Singer P A. Stability of treatment preferences: although most preferences do not change, most people change some of their preferences.  J Clin Ethics . 1997;  8 124-135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Illinois Public Act 92-0364 (1991). Available at http://www.legis.state.il.us/legislation/publicacts/pubact92/acts/92-0364.html. Accessed March 1, 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Meier D E, Morrison R S. Autonomy reconsidered. N Engl J Med .  2002;  346 1087-1089
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Ruark J E, Raffin T A, Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics. Initiating and withdrawing life support: principles and practice in adult medicine.  N Engl J Med . 1988;  318 25-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Edwards M J, Tolle S W. Disconnecting a ventilator at the request of a patient who knows he will then die: the doctor's anguish.  Ann Intern Med . 1992;  117 254-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Solomon M Z, O'Donnell L, Jennings B. et al . Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments.  Am J Pub Health . 1993;  83 14-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 In re Martin, 450 Mich 204; 538 NW 2d 399 (Mich 1995) . 
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Wendland v Wendland, 26 Cal 4th 519, 28 P 3d 151 (Cal 2001) . 
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Miller F G, Meier D E. Voluntary death: a comparison of terminal dehydration and physician assisted suicide.  Ann Int Med . 1998;  128 559-562
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Singer P A, Siegler M. Elective use of life-sustaining treatment in internal medicine.  Adv Intern Med . 1991;  36 57-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Bartling v Superior Court, 163 Cal App 3d 186, 195, 209 Cal Rptr 220 (Cal Ct App 2d 1984) . 
    Google Scholar
  • 68 McCann R M, Hall W J, Groth-Junker A. Comfort care for terminally ill patients: the appropriate use of nutrition and hydration.  JAMA . 1994;  272 1263-1266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >