Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2002; 23(1): 015-026
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-23508
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Are Oral-Motor Exercises Useful in the Treatment of Phonological/Articulatory Disorders?

Karen Forrest
  • Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 April 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The utility of oral-motor exercises in the remediation of children's speech acquisition delays continues to be a controversial issue. There are few empirical evaluations of the efficacy of these nonspeech activities in effecting speech changes, although much can be learned from investigations in related fields. The purpose of this article is to review the extant studies of the relation between oral-motor exercises and speech production in children as well as to examine the motor learning literature to gain a broader perspective on the issue. Results of this examination lead to questions about the procedures that are currently applied as well as to suggestions for future development of nonspeech activities in the treatment of children's phonological/articulatory disorders.

KEYWORD

Oral-motor exercises - phonological disorders - treatment

REFERENCES

  • 1 Gibbon F. Undifferentiated lingual gestures in children with articulation/phonological disorders.  J Speech Lang Hear Res . 1999;  42 382-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Powers M H. Functional disorders of articulation-symptomatology and etiology. In: Travis LE, ed. Handbook of Speech Pathology New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1957: 707-768
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Travis L E. Speech Pathology.  New York: Appleton 1931
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Hall P K, Jordan L S, Robin D A. Developmental Apraxia of Speech: Theory and Clinical Practice.  Austin, TX: Pro-ed 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Morley M E. The Development and Disorders of Speech in Childhood.  London: Livingston 1957
    Google Scholar
  • 6 [retrieved May 31, 2001].
  • 7 Johnson S R, Manning D F. Using simple tools in oral-motor therapy.  Adv Speech Lang Path Aud . 1999;  9(22) 20-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Magill R A. Motor Learning: Concepts and Applications. Boston: WBC McGraw Hill 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Mysak E D. Dysarthria and oropharyngeal reflexology: a review.  J Speech Hear Disord . 1963;  28 252-260
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Carrell J A. Disorders of Articulation.  Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall 1968
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Piaget J. Plays, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood (Gattegno C, Hodgson FM, trans).  London: Heinemann 1951
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Marshalla P R. The role of reflexes in oral-motor learning: techniques for improved articulation.  Semin Speech Lang . 1985;  6 317-335
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Netsell R. A neurobiologic view of the dysarthrias. A Neurobiologic View of Speech Production and the Dysarthrias San Diego: CollegeHill Press 1986: 53-88
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Shiavetti N, Metz D E. Evaluating Research in Communicative Disorders.  Boston: Allyn & Bacon 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Sackett D L, Robsenberg W MC, Gray J AM, Haynes R B, Richardson W S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.  Br J Med . 1996;  312 71-72
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Overstake C. Investigation of the efficacy of a treatment program for deviant swallowing and allied problems, part II.  Int J Myology . 1976;  2 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Christensen M, Hanson M. An investigation of the efficacy of oral myofunctional therapy as a precursor to articulation therapy for pre-first-grade children.  J Speech Hear Disord . 1981;  46 160-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dworkin J P, Abkarian G G, Johns D F. Apraxia of speech: the effectiveness of a treatment regimen.  J Speech Hear Disord . 1988;  53 280-294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Adams J A. Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills.  Psychol Bull . 1987;  10 41-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Naylor J C, Briggs G E. Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods.  J Exp Psychol . 1963;  65 217-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wightman D, Lintern G. Part-task training for tracking and manual control.  Hum Factors . 1985;  27 267-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kent R D. Anatomical and neuromuscular maturation of the speech mechanism: evidence from acoustic studies.  J Speech Hear Res . 1976;  19 421-447
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nittrouer S. Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: evidence from spectral moments.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1995;  97 520-530
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Thelen E, Smith L B. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action.  Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Elbert M, Powell T W, Swartzlander P. Toward a technology of generalization: how many exemplars are sufficient?.  J Speech Hear Res . 1990;  34 81-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bunton K, Weismer G. Evaluation of a reiterant forceimpulse task in the tongue.  J Speech Hear Res . 1995;  37 1020-1031
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bernthal J E, Bankson N W. Articulation and Phonological Disorders.  Boston: Allyn & Bacon 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Darley F L, Aronson A E, Brown J R. Motor Speech Disorders.  Philadelphia: Saunders 1975
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Barlow S M, Mueller E M. The relation between interangle span and in vivo resultant force in the perioral musculature.  J Speech Hear Res . 1991;  34 252-259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hinton V A, Arokiasamy W MC. Maximum interlabial pressures in normal speakers.  J Speech Lang Hear Res . 1997;  40 400-404
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 McGlone R, Proffitt W R. Patterns of tongue contact in normal and lisping speakers.  J Speech Hear Res . 1973;  16 456-476
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Robin D A, Somodi L B, Luschei E S. Measurement of tongue strength and endurance in normal and articulation disordered subjects. In: Moore CA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, eds. Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech: Perspectives on Management Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing 1991: 173-184
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Dworkin J P. Characteristics of frontal lispers clustered according to severity.  J Speech Hear Disord . 1980;  45 37-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Palmer M F, Osborn C D. A study of tongue pressures of speech defective and normal speaking individuals.  J Speech Hear Disord . 1940;  5 133-140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Dworkin J P, Culatta R A. Tongue strength: its relationship to tongue thrusting, openbite, and articulatory proficiency.  J Speech Hear Disord . 1980;  45 277-282
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Fairbanks G, Bebout B. A study of minor organic deviations in `functional' disorders of articulation: 3. The tongue.  J Speech Hear Disord . 1950;  15 348-352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Fairbanks G, Green E M. A study of minor organic deviations in `functional' disorders of articulation: 2.  Dimensions and relationships of the lips. J Speech Hear Disord . 1950;  15 165-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Fucci D J, Robertson J H. ``Functional'' defective articulation: an oral sensory disturbance.  Percept Mot Skills . 1971;  33 711-714
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ayres A J. Sensory Integration and Learning Disorders.  Los Angeles: Western Psychological Association 1973
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Bobath K, Bobath B. Spastic paralysis; treatment of by the use of reflex inhibition.  Br J Phys Med . 1950;  13 121-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Stinchfield S M, Young E H. Children with Delayed or Defective Speech: Motor-Kinesthetic Factors in Their Training.  Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 1938
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Colletti E A, Geffner D, Schlanger P. Oral stereognostic ability among tongue thrusters with interdental lisp, tongue thrusters without interdental lisp and normal children.  Percept Mot Skills . 1976;  42 259-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Fucci D, Petrosino L, Underwood G, Kendal C. Differences in lingual vibrotactile threshold shifts during magnitude-estimation scaling between normal-speaking children and children with articulation problems.  Percept Mot Skills . 1992;  75 495-504
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Lonegan D S. Vibrotactile thresholds and oral stereognosis in children.  Percept Mot Skills . 1974;  38 11-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Madison C, Fucci D. Speech-sound discrimination and tactile-kinesthetic discrimination in reference to speech production.  Percept Mot Skills . 1971;  33 831-838
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 McNutt J C. Oral sensory and motor behavior of children with /s/ or /r/ misarticulations.  J Speech Hear Res . 1977;  20 694-704
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Fucci D. Oral vibrotactile sensation: an evaluation of normal and defective speakers.  J Speech Hear Res . 1972;  15 179-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Powell T W. Stimulability considerations in the phonological treatment of a child with a persistent disorder of speech-sound production.  J Commun Disord . 1996;  29 315-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Green J R, Moore C A, Higashikawa M, Steeve R W. The physiologic development of speech motor control: lip and jaw coordination.  J Speech Lang Hear Res . 2000;  43 239-255
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 MacNeilage P F, Davis B. Acquisition of speech production: frames, then content. In: Jeannerod M, ed. Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1990: 453-475
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Green J R, Moore C A, Ruark J L, Rodda P R, Morvée W T, Van Witzenburg M J. Development of chewing in children from 12 to 48 months: longitudinal study of EMG patterns.  J Neurophysiol . 1997;  77 2704-2727
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Moore C A, Ruark J L. Does speech emerge from earlier appearing motor behaviors?.  J Speech Hear Res . 1996;  39 1034-1047
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Ruark J L, Moore C A. Coordination of lip muscle activity by 2-year-old children during speech and nonspeech tasks.  J Speech Hear Res . 1997;  40 1373-1385
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Forrest K, Adams S, McNeil M R, Southwood H. Kinematic, electromyographic, and perceptual evaluation of speech apraxia, conduction aphasia, ataxic dysarthria, and normal speech production. In: Moore C, Yorkston K, Beukelman D, eds. Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech: Perspectives and Management Baltimore: Brookes Publishing 1991: 147-171
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Moore C A, Smith A, Ringel R L. Task-specific organization of activity in human jaw muscles.  J Speech Hear Res . 1988;  31 670-680
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Locke J L. Phonological Acquisition and Change.  San Diego: Academic Press 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Gierut J A. Treatment efficacy: functional phonological disorders in children.  J Speech Lang Hear Res . 1998;  41 S85-S100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Colone E E, Forrest K. Comparison of treatment efficacy for children with persistent speech sound disorders. Poster presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association meeting, Washington, DC, November 18, 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Forrest K, Elbert M. Treatment patterns for children with variable error patterns. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association meeting, Montreal, May 17, 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Forrest K, Elbert M. Treatment for phonologically disordered children with variable substitution patterns.  Clin Linguist Phonet . 2001;  15 41-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Dodd B, Iacono T. Phonological disorders in children: changes in phonological process use during treatment.  Br J Disord Commun . 1989;  24 333-352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Forrest K, Dinnsen D A, Elbert M. The impact of substitution patterns on phonological learning by misarticulating children.  Clin Linguist Phonet . 1997;  11 63-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Forrest K, Elbert M, Dinnsen D A. The effect of substitution patterns on phonological treatment outcomes.  Clin Linguist Phonet . 2000;  14 519-531
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Weismer G, Liss J M. Reductionism is a dead-end in speech research: perspectives on a new direction. In: Moore CA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, eds. Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech: Perspectives on Management Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing 1991: 15-28
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Luschei E S. Development of objective standards of nonspeech oral strength and performance: an advocate's view. In: Moore CA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, eds. Dysarthria and Apraxia of Speech: Perspectives on Management Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing 1991: 3-14
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Cerny F, Panzarella K, Stathopoulos E. Expiratory muscle conditioning in hypotonic children with low vocal intensity levels.  J Med Speech Lang Path . 1997;  5 141-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Sapienza C, Martin D, Davenport P. Pressure threshold training in dysphonic and ventilator- dependent patients. Paper presented at the Pacific Voice Conference, San Francisco, November 11, 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Goldstein H, Gierut J. Outcomes measurement in child language and phonological disorders. In: Fratelli C, ed. Measuring Outcomes in Speech-Language Pathology New York: Thieme 1998: 406-43716
    Google Scholar

1 *This term will be used to refer to children with multiple articulatory errors that are not secondary to neurological or organic impairments. Because the source of the problem remains unclear, neither a cognitive (i.e., phonological) nor motoric (i.e., articulatory) basis is being assumed

      >