Energy Cost of Riding Bicycles with Shock Absorption Systems on a Flat Surface

Bike shock absorption systems reduce the energy variation induced by terrain irregularities, leading to a greater comfort. However, they may also induce an increase in energy expenditure for the rider. More specifically, cross-country racers claim that rear shock absorption systems generate significant energy loss. The energy losses caused by such systems may be divided in terrain-induced or rider-induced. This study aims at evaluating the rider-induced energy loss of modern suspended bicycles riding on a flat surface. Twelve experienced competitive racers underwent three multistage gradational tests (50 to 250 W) on a cross-country bicycle mounted on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer. Three different tests were performed on a fully suspended bike, front suspended and non-suspended bicycle, respectively. The suspension mode has no significant effect on V˙O₂. The relative difference of V˙O₂ between the front-suspended or full-suspended bike and the rigid bike reaches a non significant maximum of only 3 %. The claims of many competitors who still prefer front shock absorption systems could be related to a possible significant energy loss that could be present at powers superior to 250 W or when they stand on the pedals. It could also be generated by terrain-induced energy loss.

Key words:

Bicycle-shock-absorption-systems, mountain-bike-cross-country, energy-consumption.

References

• 1 Allen C, Benade M, Davies C T, Di Prampero P E, Hedman R, Merriman J, Myhre K, Shephard R J, Simmons R. Physiological responses to step, bicycle ergometer, and treadmill exercise.  J Physiol. 1968;  196 131-132
• 2 Berry M J, Woodard C M, Dunn C L, Edwards D G, Pittman C L. The effects of a mountain bike suspension system on metabolic energy expenditure.  Cycling Science. 1993;  Spring 8-14
• 3 Di Prampero P E. The energy cost of human locomotion on land and in water.  Int J Sports Med. 1986;  7 55-72
• 4 Di Prampero P E, Cortili G, Mognoni P, Saibene F. Equation of motion of a cyclist.  J Appl Physiol. 1979;  47 201-206
• 5 Kyle C R. The power output of bicycle trainers.  Cycling Science. 1991;  June 4-10
• 6 Lothian F, Farrally M R. A comparison of methods for estimating oxygen uptake during intermittent exercise.  J Sports Sci. 1995;  13 491-497
• 7 Marsh A P, Martin P E. The association between cycling experience and preferred and most economical cadences.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;  25 1269-1274
• 8 Needle S A, Hull M L. An off-road bicycle with adjustable suspension kinematics.  Cycling Science. 1997;  Spring 4-8
• 9 Olsen J. Bicycle suspension systems meet Mr. Simple Dynamics.  Cycling Science. 1992;  Fall 6-12
• 10 Seifert J G, Luetkemeir M J, Spencer M K, Miller D, Burke E R. The effect of mountain bike suspension systems on energy expenditure, physical exertion and time trial performance during mountain bicycling.  Int J Sports Med. 1997;  18 197-200
• 11 Stanforth P R, Ruthven M D, Gagnon J, Bouchard C, Leon A S, Rao D C, Skinner J S, Wilmore J H. Accuracy of prediction equations to estimate submaximal during cycle ergometry: The HERITAGE Family Study.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;  31 183-188
• 12 Takaishi T, Yamamoto T, Ono T, Moritani T. Neuromuscular, metabolic, and kinetic adaptations for skilled pedaling performance in cyclists.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 442-449
• 13 Wang E L, Hull M L. Power dissipated by off-road bicycle suspension systems.  Cycling Science. 1994;  Winter 10-26