Download PDF
Viszeralchirurgie 2000; 35(3): 166-171
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-3752
ÜBERSICHT
ORIGINALARBEIT
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Ist nach tiefer anteriorer Rektumresektion eine kolonpouch-anale Anastomose empfehlenswert?

Is a colonpouch-anal anastomosis mandatory following low anterior resection?A. Fürst, L. Hutzel, A. Beham, K.-W. Jauch
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum der Universität, Regensburg
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung.

Einleitung: Eine komplette mesorektale Exzision beim Karzinom des mittleren und unteren Rektumdrittels macht eine komplette Entfernung des Rektumreservoirs notwendig. Die Anastomose kommt folglich als koloanale Anastomose unmittelbar suprasphinkter oder intersphinkter zu liegen. Die in dieser Weise operierten Patienten klagen häufig über eine hohe Stuhlfrequenz, imperativen Stuhldrang, Stuhlfragmentierung und Stuhlschmieren. Um diese Probleme zu lindern, wurde 1986 erstmals die koloanale Anastomose mit vorgeschaltetem Kolonpouch beschrieben. Methode: Alle relevanten Artikel bezogen auf das Thema Kolonpouch wurden ab dem Jahr 1986 herangezogen. Vorteile und Nachteile einer neorektalen Reservoirbildung wurden mit der geraden koloanalen Anastomosentechnik verglichen und bewertet. Ergebnisse: Die Konstruktion eines Kolonpouches nach tiefer anteriorer Rektumresektion reduziert die Stuhlfrequenz, die Häufigkeit der Stuhldrangepisoden und die Inzidenz an Inkontinenzproblemen. Die Pouchbildung kann jedoch zu Stuhlentleerungsstörungen führen und Einläufe oder Suppositorien notwendig machen. Die Wahl eines kurzen 5 - 7 cm langen Kolonpouchs minimiert die Evakuationsprobleme. Schlussfolgerung: Nach tiefer anteriorer Rektumresektion zeigen sich verglichen mit der koloanalen Anastomose übereinstimmend funktionelle Vorteile für die kolonpouch-anale Anastomose. Erste Langzeituntersuchungen zeigen die Vorteile des Kolonpouchs insbesondere im ersten postoperativen Jahr.

Is a colonpouch-anal anastomosis mandatory following low anterior resection?

Introduction: Total mesorectal excision (TME) in cancer of the middle and distal part of the rectum results in a complete resection of the rectal reservoir. The position of the anastomosis is close to the internal sphincter. Following this surgical procedure not few patients suffer on high stool frequency, urgency, stool fragmentation (clustering) and soiling in the postoperative period. In order to deminish this problems a colonic J pouch was introduced in 1986. Methods: All relevant articles identified in Medline databases were reviewed from 1986 to present. Functional results of the neorectal reservoir were reviewed and compared with the straight coloanal anastomotic technic. Results: The colonic J pouch has been shown to decrease stool frequency, urgency and continence problems. On the other hand a colonic pouch may increase the incidence of incomplete defecation. A small pouch design in the range of 5 - 7 cm minimizes evacuation problems. Conclusion: A colon pouch produces superior functional results compared with straight coloanal anastomosis following low anterior rectal excision. The functional superiority of the colon pouch was greatest at the first year postoperatively.

Schlüsselwörter:

Rektumkarzinom - Kolonpouch - Operationstechnik - Funktion - Totale mesorektale Exzision (TME)

Key words:

Rectal cancer - Colonic J Pouch - Total mesorectal excision (TME)

Literatur

  • 1 Miles W E. A method of abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon.  Lancet. 1908;  ii 1812-132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Miles W E. The radical abdomino-perineal operation for cancer of the rectum and of the pelvic colon.  Br Med J. 1910;  2 941-942
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dukes C E. The spread of cancer of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1930;  17 643-648
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dukes C E. The surgical pathology of rectal cancer.  Proc R Soc Med. 1943;  37 131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Westhues H. Über die Entstehung und Vermeidung des lokalen Rektumkarzinom-Rezidivs.  Arch Klin Chir. 1930;  161 582
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Westhues H. Die pathologisch-anatomischen Grundlagen des Rektumkarzinoms. Thieme Verlag Leipzig 1934: 68
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Goligher J C, Dukes C E, Bussey H JR. Lokal recurrences after sphincter saving excisions for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid.  Br J Surg. 1951;  39 199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Parks A G. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis.  J R Soc Med. 1972;  65 975-976
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Goligher J C. Recent trends in the practice of sphincter saving excision for rectal cancer.  Ann Roy Coll Engl. 1979;  61 169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pollett W G, Nicholls R J. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum.  Ann Surg. 1983;  198 159-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Williams N S, Johnston D. Survival and recurrence after sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1984;  71 278-282
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T. Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter-preserving surgery.  Cancer. 1995;  76 388-392
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fain S N, Patin S, Morganstern L. Use of mechanical apparatus in low colo-rectal anastomosis.  Arch Surg. 1975;  110 1079-1082
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon M F, Williams N S. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision.  Lancet. 1986;  ii 996-999
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Heald R J. The 'Holy Plane' of rectal surgery.  J R Soc Med. 1988;  81 503-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 MacFarlane J K, Ryall R DH, Heald R J. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.  Lancet. 1993;  341 457-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Williams N S. The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancer.  Br J Surg. 1984;  71 575-581
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Thomas C, Madden F, Jehu D. Psychosocial morbidity in the first three months following stoma surgery.  J Psychosom Res. 1984;  28 251-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Thomas C, Madden F, Jehu D. Psychsocial effects of stomas - Psychological morbidity one year after surgery.  J Psychosom Res. 1987;  31 311-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pedersen I K, Huit K, Christiansen J, Olsen J, Jensen P, Mortensen P E. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma.  Ann Surg. 1986;  204 133-135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McDonalds P J, Heald R J. A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices.  Br J Surg. 1983;  70 727-729
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lewis W G, Martin I G, Williamson M ER, Stephenson B M, Holdsworth P J, Finan P J. et al . Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 259-263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Miller S, Lewis W G, Williamson M ER, Holdsworth P J, Johnston D, Finan P J. Factors that influence the outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 1327-1330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Williamson M ER, Lewis W G, Finan P J, Miller A S, Holdsworth P J, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma; myth or reality?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 411-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Otto I C, Ito K, Ye C, Hibi K, Kasai Y, Akiyama S. et al . Causes of rectal incontinence after sphincter-preserving operations for rectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1423-1427
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Molloy R G, Moran K T, Coulter J, Waldron R, Kirwan W O. Mechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 462-464
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Havenga K, DeRuiter M C, Enker W W, Welvaart K. Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 384-388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jehle E C, Haehnel T, Starlinger M J, Becker H D. Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior resection for rectal cancer.  Am J Surg. 1995;  169 147-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Parks A G, Nicholls R J, Belliveau P. Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1980;  67 533-538
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ursonimiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M, Matsuo S, Sawai S. et al . Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;  23 459-466
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Lemozy J, Bloom E. Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 136-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Parc R, Tiret E, Frileux P, Moszkowski E, Loygue J. Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma.  Br J Surg. 1986;  73 139-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Nicholls R J, Lubowski D Z, Donaldson D R. Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision.  Br J Surg. 1988;  75 318-320
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, Hatada T, Fujita S, Sakanoue Y. et al . Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic pouch-anal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 1434-1438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mortensen N JM, Ramirez J M, Takeuchi N, Smilgin Humphreys M M. Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcome.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 611-613
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ho Y H, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection; comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 978-980
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Berger A, Tiret E, Parc R, Frileux P, Hannoun L, Nordlinger B. et al . Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum.  World J Surg. 1992;  16 470-477
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hida J, Yasutomi M, Fujimoto K, Okuno K, Leda S, Machidera N. et al . Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 986-991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Guillemot F, Leroy J, Boniface M. et al . Functional assessment of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir and excision of the transition zone.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 967-972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Péllissier E P, Blum D, Bachour A, Bosset J F. Functional results of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 843-846
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Cohen A M. Colon J-pouch rectal reconstruction after total or subtotal proctectomy.  World J Surg. 1993;  17 267-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Ortiz H, Miguel M D, Armendariz P. et al . Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 375-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Seow-Cheon F, Goh H S. Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 608-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Hallböök O, Pahlman L, Krog M, Wexner S D, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection.  Ann Surg. 1996;  224 58-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Ramirez J M, Mortensen N J, Takeuchi N, Smilgin Humphreys M M. Colonic J-pouch rectal reconstruction - is it really a neorectum?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1286-1288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Romanos J, Stebbing J F, Humphreys M M. et al . Ambulatory manometric examination in patients with colonic J pouch and in normal controls.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 1744-1746
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Chew S-B, Tindal D S. Colonic J-pouch as a neorectum: functional assessment.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;  67 607-610
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Hallböök O, Nyström P, Sjödahl R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 332-338
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Lazorthes F, Gamagami R, Chiotasso P. et al . Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 1409-1413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami R A. et al . Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis.  Br J Surg. 1997;  84 1449-1451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Joo J S, Latulippe J F, Omer A, Weiss E G, Nogueras J J, Wexner S D. Long-term funktional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 740-746
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Fürst A, Burghofer K, Babl-Weisbarth M, Kümmel S, Tange S, Jauch K-W. Funktionelles Ergebnis und Lebensqualität nach coloanaler oder colonpouch-analer Anastomose - eine prospektiv randomisierte Studie.  Langenbecks Archiv, Forumsband. 1998;  Supplement I 621-624
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Hildebrandt U, Lindemann W, Kreißler-Haag D, Feifel G. Die intersphinctere Rectumresektion mit colosphincterem Pouch.  Chirurg. 1995;  66 377-384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Huber F T, Herter B, Siewert J R. Colonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 896-902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Z'graggen K, Maurer C A, Mettler D, Stoupis C, Wildi S, Büchler M W. A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch-anal anastomosis: preliminary results in pigs.  Surgery. 1999;  125 105-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Ruppert R, Staimmer D. Colonic „Coloplasty”-Pouch: A novel rechnique for low anterior resections.  Coloproctology. 1999;  21 232 (abstract)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Dennett E R, Parry B R. Misconceptions about the colonic J-pouch: what the accumulating data show.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 804-811
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Baker J W. Low end to side rectosigmoid anastomosis: description of technique.  Arch Surg. 1950;  61 143-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

OA Dr. med. A. Fürst

Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie

Klinikum der Universität

Franz-Josef-Strauß-Straße 11

93053 Regensburg

Phone: 0941/944-0

Fax: 0941/9446802

      >