RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791806
Prevalence and Impact of Constipation on Reconstructive Outcomes Following Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery

Abstract
Objective
Postoperative constipation in endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) may provoke undesired straining, which, in theory, may create intracranial pressure shifts and impact skull base reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence and contributing factors to postoperative constipation after ESBS, and whether this impacts reconstructive outcomes.
Methods
Patients undergoing ESBS between July 2018 and December 2022 at a single-center, tertiary academic skull base surgery program were retrospectively reviewed. Chart reviews were performed to identify average bowel movements per day, indication for surgery, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), history of chronic pain, length of postoperative bedrest, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative use of opioid analgesics. Additionally, use of a standing stool bowel regimen, as-needed (PRN) stool softeners/laxatives, and enemas were recorded. Constipation was defined as greater than 48 hours without a bowel movement.
Results
In total, 213 patients (115 with intradural pathologies) were identified, of which 146 (69%) patients had postoperative constipation. Postoperative constipation was associated with longer bedrest (1.86 ± 0.20 vs. 1.06 ± 0.12 days; p = 0.011); increased morphine equivalent dose (MED) during postoperative days 2, 3, 5, and 6 (all p < 0.05); and total postoperative MED (106.70 ± 14.01 vs. 46.88 ± 8.44 mg; p < 0.001). Additionally, postoperative constipation was an independent predictor of LOS (p = 0.009). There were no differences in postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak between the groups (p = 0.622).
Conclusion
Postoperative constipation rates were high after ESBS and likely causative factors include increased immobilization and postoperative opioid use. Standing bowel regimens should be considered in ESBS patients. However, there was no increased rate of postoperative CSF leaks.
Keywords
skull base reconstruction outcomes - postoperative - analgesia - opioid - constipation - CSF leakPrevious Presentation
This work was presented preliminarily as a poster at the Triological Society Combined Sections Meeting in Coronado, CA, January 26–28, 2023.
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 04. Januar 2024
Angenommen: 17. September 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Oktober 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 McCoul ED, Anand VK, Bedrosian JC, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic skull base surgery and its impact on sinonasal-related quality of life. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2 (02) 174-181
- 2 Oostra A, Van Furth W, Georgalas C. Extended endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: from the sella to the anterior and posterior cranial fossa. ANZ J Surg 2012; 82 (03) 122-130
- 3 Casler JD, Doolittle AM, Mair EA. Endoscopic surgery of the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (01) 16-24
- 4 Zimmer LA, Theodosopoulos PV. Anterior skull base surgery: open versus endoscopic. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 17 (02) 75-78
- 5 Goshtasbi K, Lehrich BM, Abouzari M. et al. Endoscopic versus nonendoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary adenomas: a national database study. J Neurosurg 2020; 134 (03) 816-824
- 6 Turri-Zanoni M, Zocchi J, Lambertoni A. et al. Endoscopic endonasal reconstruction of anterior skull base defects: what factors really affect the outcomes?. World Neurosurg 2018; 116: e436-e443
- 7 Hegazy HM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam A, Zweig J. Transnasal endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2000; 110 (07) 1166-1172
- 8 Fatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Malkasian D, Kelly DF. MEndonasal versus supraorbital keyhole removal of craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5, Suppl 2): 269-284
- 9 Senior BA, Ebert CS, Bednarski KK. et al. Minimally invasive pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 2008; 118 (10) 1842-1855
- 10 Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (06) 1544-1568
- 11 Ajlan A, Basindwah S, Hawsawi A. et al. Early postoperative computed tomography scan air distribution predicts postoperative CSF leak in endoscopic skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2023; 172: e605-e610
- 12 Hussaini AS, Clark CM, DeKlotz TR. Perioperative considerations in endoscopic skull base surgery. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 2020; 8 (02) 129-135
- 13 Abiri A, Patel TR, Nguyen E. et al. Postoperative protocols following endoscopic skull base surgery: an evidence-based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13 (01) 42-71
- 14 Phillips KM, Turner MT, Kuan EC. Preoperative, technical, and postoperative considerations for skull base reconstruction: a practical review of critical concepts. Rhinology 2023; 61 (05) 386-403
- 15 Kumar L, Barker C, Emmanuel A. Opioid-induced constipation: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and management. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 141737
- 16 Tottey W, Feria-Gervasio D, Gaci N. et al. Colonic transit time is a driven force of the gut microbiota composition and metabolism: in vitro evidence. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 23 (01) 124-134
- 17 London Jr NR, Rangel GG, Walz PC. The expanded endonasal approach in pediatric skull base surgery: a review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2020; 5 (02) 313-325
- 18 Tien DA, Stokken JK, Recinos PF, Woodard TD, Sindwani R. Comprehensive postoperative management after endoscopic skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2016; 49 (01) 253-263
- 19 Lacy BE, Mearin F, Chang L. et al. Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 150 (06) 1393-1407
- 20 Roxbury CR, Lobo BC, Kshettry VR. et al. Perioperative management in endoscopic endonasal skull-base surgery: a survey of the North American Skull Base Society. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017; 8 (05) 631-640
- 21 Kuan EC, Birkenbeuel JL, Kovacs AJ. et al. Patterns of opioid usage and predictors of utilization following endoscopic skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 (10) 1939-1945
- 22 Thompson WG. Constipation and catharsis. Can Med Assoc J 1976; 114 (10) 927-931
- 23 Teasell R, Dittmer DK. Complications of immobilization and bed rest. Part 2: other complications. Can Fam Physician 1993; 39: 1440-1442 , 1445–1446
- 24 Iovino P, Chiarioni G, Bilancio G. et al. New onset of constipation during long-term physical inactivity: a proof-of-concept study on the immobility-induced bowel changes. PLoS One 2013; 8 (08) e72608
- 25 Bell RB, Dierks EJ, Homer L, Potter BE. Management of cerebrospinal fluid leak associated with craniomaxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62 (06) 676-684
- 26 Yilmazlar S, Arslan E, Kocaeli H. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage complicating skull base fractures: analysis of 81 cases. Neurosurg Rev 2006; 29 (01) 64-71
- 27 Chang MT, Jitaroon K, Song S. et al. Venous thromboembolism rates and risk factors following endoscopic skull base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022; 12 (07) 935-941
- 28 Mujagic E, Marti WR, Coslovsky M. et al. Associations of hospital length of stay with surgical site infections. World J Surg 2018; 42 (12) 3888-3896
- 29 Khan NA, Quan H, Bugar JM, Lemaire JB, Brant R, Ghali WA. Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs and length of stay in a tertiary care center. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 (02) 177-180
- 30 Birkenbeuel JL, Warner DC, Abiri A. et al. Predictors of postoperative nausea and vomiting after endoscopic skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 (04) 761-768
- 31 Prichard D, Norton C, Barucha AE. Management of opioid-induced constipation. Br J Nurs 2016; 25 (10) S4-S5 ; S8–S11