Prophylactic Bracing Has No Effect on Lower Extremity Alignment or Functional Performance

Abstract

Prophylactic ankle bracing is commonly used during physical activity. Understanding how bracing affects body mechanics is critically important when discussing both injury prevention and sport performance. The purpose is to determine if ankle bracing affects lower extremity mechanics during the Landing Error Scoring System test (LESS) and Sage Sway Index (SSI). Thirty physically active participants volunteered for this study. Participants completed the LESS and SSI in both a braced and unsupported conditions. Total errors were recorded for the LESS. Total errors and time (seconds) were recorded for the SSI. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to evaluate any differences between the brace conditions for each dependent variable. A priori alpha level was set at p<0.05. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test yielded no significant difference between the braced and unsupported conditions for the LESS (Z=−0.35, p=0.72), SSI time (Z=−0.36, p=0.72), or SSI Errors (Z=−0.37, p=0.71). Ankle braces had no effect on subjective clinical assessments of lower extremity alignment or postural stability. Utilization of a prophylactic support at the ankle did not substantially alter the proximal components of the lower kinetic chain.

Key word

ankle - landing error scoring system - external support

• References

• 1 Bell DR, Smith MD, Pennuto AP, Stiffler MR, Olson ME. Jump-landing mechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A landing error scoring system study. J Athl Train 2014; 49: 435-441
• 2 Bot SD, Verhagen EA, Van Mechelen W. The effect of ankle bracing and taping on functional performance: A review of the literature: review article. Int J Sports Med 2003; 4: 1-14
• 3 Bruns J, Scherlitz J, Luessenhop S. The stabilizing effect of orthotic devices on plantar flexion/dorsal extension and horizontal rotation of the ankle joint: An experimental cadaveric investigation. Int J Sports Med 1996; 17: 614-618
• 4 Burks RT, Bean BG, Marcus R, Barker HB. Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19: 104-106
• 5 DiStefano LJ, Padua DA, Brown CN, Guskiewicz KM. Lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces after prophylactic lace-up ankle bracing. J Athl Train 2008; 43: 234
• 6 Hall EA, Simon JE, Docherty CL. Using ankle bracing and taping to decrease range of motion and velocity during inversion perturbation while walking. J Athl Train 2016; 51: 283-290
• 7 Harriss D, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
• 8 Hootman J, Dick R, Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: Summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train 2007; 42: 311-319
• 9 Lindley TR, Kernozek TW. Taping and semirigid bracing may not affect ankle functional range of motion. J Athl Train 1995; 30: 109-112
• 10 MacKean LC, Bell G, Burnham RS. Prophylactic ankle bracing vs. taping: Effects on functional performance in female basketball players. J Orthop Sport Phys 1995; 22: 77-81
• 11 Macpherson K, Sitler M, Kimura I, Horodyski M. Effects of a semirigid and softshell prophylactic ankle stabilizer on selected performance tests among high school football players. J Orthop Sport Phys 1995; 21: 147-152
• 12 Metcalfe R, Schlabach G, Looney M, Renehan E. A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance. J Athl Train 1997; 32: 136-140
• 13 Olmsted LC, Vela LI, Denegar CR, Hertel J. Prophylactic ankle taping and bracing: A numbers-needed-to-treat and cost-benefit analysis. J Athl Train 2004; 39: 95
• 14 Padua DA, Boling MC, DiStefano LJ, Onate JA, Beutler AI, Marshall SW. Reliability of the landing error scoring system-real time, a clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics. Sport Rehabil 2011; 20: 145-156
• 15 Padua DA, DiStefano LJ, Beutler AI, de la Motte SJ, DiStefano MJ, Marshall SW. The landing error scoring system as a screening tool for an anterior cruciate ligament injury-prevention program in elite-youth soccer athletes. J Athl Train 2015; 50: 589-595
• 16 Padua DA, Marshall SW, Boling MC, Thigpen CA, Garrett WE, Beutler AI. The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump-landing biomechanics: The JUMP-ACL study. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 1996-2002
• 17 Paris DL. The effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid ankle braces and adhesive ankle taping on speed, balance, agility, and vertical jump. J Athl Train 1992; 27: 253-256
• 18 Pienkowski D, McMorrow M, Shapiro R, Caborn D, Slayton J. The effect of ankle stabilizers on athletic performance a randomized prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23: 757-762
• 19 Riemann B, Caggiano N, Lephart SM. Examination of a clinical method of assessing postural control during a functional performance task. Sport Rehabil 1999; 8: 171-183
• 20 Scheuffelen C, Rapp W, Gollhofer A, Lohrer H. Orthotic devices in functional treatment of ankle sprain. Stabilizing effects during real movements. Int J Sports Med 1993; 14: 140-149
• 21 Wikstrom E, Arrigenna M, Tillman M, Borsa P. Dynamic postural stability in subjects with braced, functionally unstable ankles. J Athl Train 2006; 41: 245-250
• 22 Yeung M, Chang K, So C. An epidemiological survey on ankle sprain. Br J Sports Med 1994; 28: 112-116