Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2023; 36(10): 1034-1042
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748896
Original Article

Response Bias for Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery Surveys after Knee Surgery

Tina Zhang
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Matheus B. Schneider
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Tristan B. Weir
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Nichole M. Shaw
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Michael J. Foster
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Sean J. Meredith
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Natalie L. Leong
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Jonathan D. Packer
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
R. Frank Henn III
1   Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
› Author Affiliations Funding This work was supported by a grant from The James Lawrence Kernan Hospital Endowment Fund, Incorporated, in part by Career Development Award (award number: IK2 BX004879) from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory R&D (BLRD) Service.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery (PGAS) survey is an emerging tool used to capture patient satisfaction after elective surgery. Evaluating patient satisfaction is important; however, quality improvement (QI) surveys used to capture the patient experience may be subject to nonresponse bias. An orthopaedic registry was used to retrospectively identify patients who underwent ambulatory knee surgery from June 2015 to December 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of PGAS survey nonresponse and response. In the cohort of 1,161 patients, 142 (12.2%) completed the PGAS survey. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that male sex, Black race, not living with a caretaker, student or unemployment status, and worse preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue were predictors of nonresponse. The results of this study highlight the presence of nonresponse bias in the PGAS survey after elective knee surgery.

Keywords

Press Ganey - knee - orthopaedic - patient satisfaction

Authors' Contributions

T.Z.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, preparing the first draft, and reviewing and editing the manuscript for submission.


M.S.: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, preparing the first draft, and reviewing and editing the manuscript for submission.


T.W.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, supervision, preparing the first draft, and reviewing and editing the manuscript for submission.


N.S.: preparing the first draft and reviewing and editing the manuscript for submission.


M.F.: preparing the first draft and reviewing and editing the manuscript for submission.


S.J.M.: preparing the first draft and reviewing and editing the manuscript for submission.


N.L.L.: supervision, validation, preparing the first draft, and reviewing and editing the manuscript for submission.


J.D.P.: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, preparing the first draft, and reviewing and editing the manuscript for submission.


R.F.H. III: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, preparing the first draft, and reviewing and editing the manuscript for submission.




Publication History

Received: 06 September 2021

Accepted: 18 March 2022

Article published online:
11 July 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Zusman EE. HCAHPS replaces Press Ganey survey as quality measure for patient hospital experience. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (02) N21-N24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 The HCAHPS survey—frequently asked questions. Accessed April 1, 2022 from: https://www.pressganey.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/hcahps-faq.pdf?sfvrsn=4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 CMS. Outpatient and ambulatory surgery CAHPS (OAS CAHPS). Accessed April 1, 2022 at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Research/CAHPS/OAS-CAHPS
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Prince M. Epidemiology. In: Wright P, Stern J, Phelan M. eds. Core Psychiatry. Edinburgh, Scotland: Saunders Elsevier; 2012: 115-129
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Tyser AR, Abtahi AM, McFadden M, Presson AP. Evidence of non-response bias in the Press-Ganey patient satisfaction survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16: 350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 White SE. Reading the medical literature. In: Basic & Clinical Biostatistics. 5th ed. New York, NY:: McGraw-Hill Education; 2020
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Weir TB, Zhang T, Jauregui JJ. et al. Press Ganey Surveys in patients undergoing upper-extremity surgical procedures: response rate and evidence of nonresponse bias. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103 (17) 1598-1603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Compton J, Glass N, Fowler T. Evidence of selection bias and non-response bias in patient satisfaction surveys. Iowa Orthop J 2019; 39 (01) 195-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hopkins BS, Patel MR, Yamaguchi JT, Cloney MB, Dahdaleh NS. Predictors of patient satisfaction and survey participation after spine surgery: a retrospective review of 17,853 consecutive spinal patients from a single academic institution. Part 1: Press Ganey. J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 30 (03) 382-388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Group CCOA. Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Group. Press Ganey administration of hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems survey result in a biased responder sample for hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (11) 2538-2543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Boscardin CK, Gonzales R. The impact of demographic characteristics on nonresponse in an ambulatory patient satisfaction survey. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2013; 39 (03) 123-128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM, Goldstein E. et al. Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores. Health Serv Res 2009; 44 (2, pt. 1): 501-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lee B, Hollenbeck-Pringle D, Goldman V, Biondi E, Alverson B. Are caregivers who respond to the child HCAHPS survey reflective of all hospitalized pediatric patients?. Hosp Pediatr 2019; 9 (03) 162-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Malpani R, Adrados M, Mercier MR. et al. Characteristics and predictors of HCAHPS nonresponse after spine surgery. Spine 2020; 45 (08) E448-E456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Perneger TV, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Combescure C. Patient satisfaction and survey response in 717 hospital surveys in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20 (01) 158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Weir TB, Zhang T, Jauregui JJ. et al. Factors influencing Press Ganey ambulatory surgery scores in patients undergoing upper extremity procedures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2021; 5 (06) e20.00209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Henn III RF, Dubina AG, Jauregui JJ, Smuda MP, Tracy JK. The Maryland Orthopaedic Registry (MOR): design and baseline characteristics of a prospective registry. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017; 8 (04) 301-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cella D, Riley W, Stone A. et al; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63 (11) 1179-1194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL. et al. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (05) 600-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Johnson C. Measuring pain. Visual analog scale versus numeric pain scale: what is the difference?. J Chiropr Med 2005; 4 (01) 43-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Saleh KJ, Bershadsky B, Cheng E, Kane R. Lessons learned from the hip and knee musculoskeletal outcomes data evaluation and management system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 2004 (429) 272-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (05) 890-897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M. et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35 (08) 1381-1395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (02) 213-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rane AA, Tyser AR, Presson AP, Zhang C, Kazmers NH. Patient satisfaction in the hand surgery clinic: an analysis of factors that impact the Press Ganey survey. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (07) 539-547.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 O'Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Elliott MN, Zaborski L, Cleary PD. Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS hospital survey. Health Serv Res 2005; 40 (6, pt. 2): 2162-2181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hendra R, Hill A. Rethinking response rates: new evidence of little relationship between survey response rates and nonresponse bias. Eval Rev 2019; 43 (05) 307-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar