Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35(04): 298-305
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743583
Review Article

The Mesentery in Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision

Rogier M.P.H. Crolla
1   Department of Surgery, Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrointestinal/Oncological Surgeon, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
,
J. Calvin Coffey
2   Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Group Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
,
Esther J. C. Consten
3   Department of Surgery, Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrointestinal/Oncological Surgeon, Academic Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In recent decades, surgery for rectal cancer has evolved from an operation normally performed under poor vision with a lot of blood loss, relatively high morbidity, and mortality to a safer operation. Currently, minimally invasive rectal procedures are performed with limited blood loss, reduced morbidity, and minimal mortality. The main cause is better knowledge of anatomy and adhering to the principle of operating along embryological planes. Surgery has become surgery of compartments, more so than that of organs. So, rectal cancer surgery has evolved to mesorectal cancer surgery as propagated by Heald and others. The focus on the mesentery of the rectum has led to renewed attention to the anatomy of the fascia surrounding the rectum. Better magnification during laparoscopy and improved optimal three-dimensional (3D) vision during robot-assisted surgery have contributed to the refinement of total mesorectal excision (TME). In this chapter, we describe how to perform a robot-assisted TME with particular attention to the mesentery. Specific points of focus and problem solving are discussed.

Keywords

robot-assisted total mesorectal excision - surgical technique - mesentery


Publication History

Article published online:
10 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Culligan K, Walsh S, Dunne C. et al. The mesocolon: a histological and electron microscopic characterization of the mesenteric attachment of the colon prior to and after surgical mobilization. Ann Surg 2014; 260 (06) 1048-1056
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Coffey JC, O'Leary DP. The mesentery: structure, function, and role in disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 1 (03) 238-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chapuis P, Bokey L, Fahrer M, Sinclair G, Bogduk N. Mobilization of the rectum: anatomic concepts and the bookshelf revisited. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45 (01) 1-8 , discussion 8–9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Heald RJ. The 'Holy Plane' of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 1988; 81 (09) 503-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Embryology and anatomy of the rectum. Semin Surg Oncol 1998; 15 (02) 66-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kinugasa Y, Sugihara K. Topology of the fascial structures in rectal surgery: complete cancer resection and the importance of avoiding autonomic nerve injury. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 2010; 21 (02) 95-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kinugasa Y, Murakami G, Suzuki D, Sugihara K. Histological identification of fascial structures posterolateral to the rectum. Br J Surg 2007; 94 (05) 620-626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Miskovic D, Ahmed J, Bissett-Amess R. et al; European Academy for Robotic Colorectal Surgery (EARCS). European consensus on the standardization of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21 (03) 270-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yang XF, Li GX, Luo GH, Zhong SZ, Ding ZH. New insights into autonomic nerve preservation in high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15 (06) 2533-2539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sekimoto M, Takemasa I, Mizushima T. et al. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (03) 861-866
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Goh N, Fong SS, How KY, Wong KY, Loong TH, Tay GT. Apical lymph node dissection of the inferior mesenteric artery. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18 (06) O206-O209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wang GJ, Gao CF, Wei D, Wang C, Meng WJ. Anatomy of the lateral ligaments of the rectum: a controversial point of view. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16 (43) 5411-5415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kim NK, Kim HS, Alessa M, Torky R. Optimal complete rectum mobilization focused on the anatomy of the pelvic fascia and autonomic nerves: 30 years of experience at Severance Hospital. Yonsei Med J 2021; 62 (03) 187-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Walsh PC, Schlegel PN. Radical pelvic surgery with preservation of sexual function. Ann Surg 1988; 208 (04) 391-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kinugasa Y, Murakami G, Uchimoto K, Takenaka A, Yajima T, Sugihara K. Operating behind Denonvilliers' fascia for reliable preservation of urogenital autonomic nerves in total mesorectal excision: a histologic study using cadaveric specimens, including a surgical experiment using fresh cadaveric models. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49 (07) 1024-1032
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lindsey I, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. Denonvilliers' fascia lies anterior to the fascia propria and rectal dissection plane in total mesorectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48 (01) 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wei B, Zheng Z, Fang J. et al. Chinese Postoperative Urogenital Function (PUF) Research Collaboration Group. Effect of Denonvilliers' fascia preservation versus resection during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision on postoperative urogenital function of male rectal cancer patients: initial results of Chinese PUF-01 randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2020; 274 (06) e473-e480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gavriilidis P, Wheeler J, Spinelli A, de'Angelis N, Simopoulos C, Di Saverio S. Robotic vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancers: has a paradigm change occurred? A systematic review by updated meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22 (11) 1506-1517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Phan K, Kahlaee HR, Kim SH, Toh JWT. Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 23 (03) 221-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H. et al. Robotic-assisted surgery compared with laparoscopic resection surgery for rectal cancer: the ROLARR RCT. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation 2019 PMID: 31556981
    PubMedGoogle Scholar