Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38(07): 571-578
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742303
Original Article

The Influence of Flow Velocity in the Feeding Vessel on Flap Perfusion in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap

Jeongmok Cho
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
,
Hyun Ho Han 
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
,
Jin Sup Eom
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Contralateral perfusion of zones II and IV is critical to estimate the amount of fat necrosis and determine intraoperative flap sacrifice during autologous breast reconstruction. We aimed to determine whether perfusion of the contralateral side was affected by the peak flow velocity in the feeding vessels in the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforator free flap reconstructions.

Methods This was a retrospective review of patients who received DIEA perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction from February to July 2020. Intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) angiography and measurement software (Image J) were used to validate the perfusion of the contralateral side of the flap. Peak flow in the vessels was measured with duplex color Doppler and linear correlation was used to analyze the association between perfusion and blood flow velocity.

Results Forty-two patients received a DIEP flap. The average age of the patients was 48.5 years, and body mass index was 23.84 kg/m2. Peak flow velocity of the internal mammary artery (IMA) was significantly higher than that of the DIEA (p <0.05). Contralateral perfusion confirmed by ICG angiography was higher in the IMA than in the DIEA (p <0.05). A linear correlation was found between peak speed (p = 0.045) and ICG perfusion length (p = 0.00003).

Conclusion The status of flap perfusion depends on the feeding vessel. The velocity of blood flow between IMA and DIEA is different, and the flap perfusion varies accordingly. Therefore, ICG angiography should be performed after anastomosis at the recipient site for an accurate assessment.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - DIEP flap - flow velocity


Publication History

Received: 09 July 2021

Accepted: 11 November 2021

Article published online:
24 January 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Tønseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, Åbyholm FE, Stavem K. Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (10) 1188-1194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Zhou A, Ducic I, Momeni A. Sensory restoration of breast reconstruction—the search for the ideal approach continues. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118 (05) 780-792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lee K-T, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Mun G-H. Ischaemic time and fat necrosis in breast reconstruction with a free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (02) 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baumann DP, Lin HY, Chevray PM. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (05) 1335-1341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cho MJ, Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Clinical decision making using CTA in conjoined, bipedicled DIEP and SIEA for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 241-246
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Han HH, Kang MK, Choe J. et al. Estimation of contralateral perfusion in the DIEP flap by scoring the midline-crossing vessels in computed tomographic angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (04) 697e-705e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Losken A, Zenn MR, Hammel JA, Walsh MW, Carlson GW. Assessment of zonal perfusion using intraoperative angiography during abdominal flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (04) 618e-624e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Munabi NCO, Olorunnipa OB, Goltsman D, Rohde CH, Ascherman JA. The ability of intra-operative perfusion mapping with laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography to predict mastectomy flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: a prospective trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (04) 449-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Girard N, Delomenie M, Malhaire C. et al. Innovative DIEP flap perfusion evaluation tool: qualitative and quantitative analysis of indocyanine green-based fluorescence angiography with the SPY-Q proprietary software. PLoS One 2019; 14 (06) e0217698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chang BW, Luethke R, Berg WA, Hamper UM, Manson PN. Two-dimensional color Doppler imaging for precision preoperative mapping and size determination of TRAM flap perforators. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (01) 197-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hanasono MM, Ogunleye O, Yang JS, Hartley CJ, Miller MJ. Changes in blood velocity following microvascular free tissue transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (07) 417-424
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Daly LT, Doval AF, Lin SJ, Tobias A, Lee BT, Dowlatshahi AS. Role of CTA in women with abdominal scars undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction: review of 1,187 flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 294-300
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mohan AT, Zhu L, Wang Z, Vijayasekaran A, Saint-Cyr M. Techniques and perforator selection in single, dominant DIEP flap breast reconstruction: algorithmic approach to maximize efficiency and safety. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (05) 790e-803e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bailey SH, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C. et al. The single dominant medial row perforator DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: three-dimensional perforasome and clinical results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (03) 739-751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sriganesh K, Vinay B, Bhadrinarayan V. Indocyanine green dye administration can cause oxygen desaturation. J Clin Monit Comput 2013; 27 (03) 371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Newman MI, Samson MC. The application of laser-assisted indocyanine green fluorescent dye angiography in microsurgical breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (01) 21-26
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hembd A, Teotia SS, Zhu H, Haddock NT. Optimizing perforator selection: a multivariable analysis of predictors for fat necrosis and abdominal morbidity in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (03) 583-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Newman MI, Samson MC, Tamburrino JF, Swartz KA. Intraoperative laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography for the evaluation of mastectomy flaps in immediate breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (07) 487-492
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 de Bono DP, Samani NJ, Spyt TJ, Hartshorne T, Thrush AJ, Evans DH. Transcutaneous ultrasound measurement of blood-flow in internal mammary artery to coronary artery grafts. Lancet 1992; 339 (8790): 379-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Heitland AS, Markowicz M, Koellensperger E, Schoth F, Feller A-M, Pallua N. Duplex ultrasound imaging in free transverse rectus abdominis muscle, deep inferior epigastric artery perforator, and superior gluteal artery perforator flaps: early and long-term comparison of perfusion changes in free flaps following breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (02) 117-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Miyamoto S, Minabe T, Harii K. Effect of recipient arterial blood inflow on free flap survival area. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (02) 505-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bhullar H, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. Fat necrosis after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a review of perfusion-related causes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (05) 1454-1461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lee KT, Eom Y, Jeon BJ, Mun GH. Vertical spacing of perforators in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction can affect the outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (02) 319-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Doval AF, Lamelas AM, Daly LT. et al. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction in women with previous abdominal incisions: a comparison of complication rates. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 81 (05) 560-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ibrahim AMS, Kim PS, Rabie AN, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Vasopressors and reconstructive flap perfusion: a review of the literature comparing the effects of various pharmacologic agents. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 73 (02) 245-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cho MJ, Kwon JG, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. The role of duplex ultrasound in microsurgical reconstruction: review and technical considerations. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 514-521
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Feng LJ. Recipient vessels in free-flap breast reconstruction: a study of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (02) 405-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rangel WIV, Cajas GFD, Rojas WE. Thoracodorsal artery examination with doppler ultrasound in healthy volunteers in a level three hospital. Rev Colomb Radiol. 2011; 22 (02) 3158-3163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rubino C, Coscia V, Cavazzuti AM, Canu V. Haemodynamic enhancement in perforator flaps: the inversion phenomenon and its clinical significance. A study of the relation of blood velocity and flow between pedicle and perforator vessels in perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (06) 636-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Heitmann C, Felmerer G, Durmus C, Matejic B, Ingianni G. Anatomical features of perforator blood vessels in the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53 (03) 205-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 El-Mrakby HH, Milner RH. The vascular anatomy of the lower anterior abdominal wall: a microdissection study on the deep inferior epigastric vessels and the perforator branches. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (02) 539-543 , discussion 544–547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar